Samurai And Knights Dbq

Samurai and Knights are warriors fighting and serving for their lord. Samurai and knights are both trained, physically and mentally to fight for their lords, however while in a battle, strategies of both make it hard to distinguish who would win. While both warriors are very similar in many ways, Samurais differences such as their, training, weapons, and armor give them big advantages.

The similarities between samurais and knights were greater than the differences due to the similarity in the hierarchy and the armor they used to protect themselves. The Samurai were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment.” They made up about 10% of Japan’s population. Similarly, knights were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for land.” (Document A) There were about 12,000 knights in England and Normandy, France in the 12th century. Even though Japan and Europe had no communication or access to each other, both areas placed the warrior classes in the middle of the hierarchy and owed loyalty/military services. This shows that the social order of both Feudal Japan and Feudal

A long time ago during the middle ages Europe and Japan both developed a class of warriors. These warriors were called Samurai and Knights all though these two warriors had different names and they knew nothing about each other. They both had a lot of Similarities for example there social position, their training, and their honor. They also had a lot of differences but their similarities were greater than their differences. This can be show by looking at three areas document A, B, and C.

There are many similarities between the samurai of medieval Japan and the knights of medieval Europe, especially considering their training, armor, and codes. In documents A and B, it explains that they both began training in childhood, used artificial swords to practice to fight, and that they were both spiritual. However, the samurai wrote poetry and studied Zen Buddhism whereas, the knights learned to ride ponies and the pages became a squire at 14 and then became a knight at 21. Document B states that,¨By the age of 14, pages were eligible to become a squire.If a squire gained approval from an examining knight, he would usually become a knight at around the age of 21. Another similarity in Documents C and D is that they both wore helmets

Weak governments and even weaker armies… This led to the development of feudalism. Feudalism is the system where lords offer land grants to lesser nobles in exchange for protection of the land when needed. The Knights and Europe, and the Samurai in Japan were warriors, or the lesser noble who were offered land. In Japan and Europe Feudalism began around 1000 CE and ended around 1600 CE. Were the similarities between the Samurai and Knights greater Than the differences. Throughout the age of feudalism, there were many differences between the Samurai and Knights. For instance, there is the code of honor, religion, training, armor, hereditary relationships, and death.

Knights vs Samurai: The Similarities Were Greater Than The Differences A long time ago, in Europe and Japan, they both turned to feudal systems. They had developed a social pyramid with warriors working for lords and masters. Knights and samurai were the warriors. Many people think of them as two totally different warriors, but were the similarities greater than the differences?

I’ll be talking about social order, Military and armor and what really a samurai and or a knight is. A reason their differences are truly greater than their similarities is the social pyramid. In Japan the group that was more like a lord was a daimyo, A daimyo was also a landowner. Samurais where hired by daimyos for protection in return they’d get land or a payment. In Europe a lord was a landowner which is like a daimyo.

Bushido means that a true warrior must keep his loyalty, courage, respect, compassion, and honour as it is important. It was mainly about how a warrior should act and what they have do. The samurais code of conduct is extremely strict, if the samurais master or leader dies they must perform Seppuku. The Knights didn’t have to do this but may kill themselves because they feel that they have no purpose. This is when the Samurai slices his sword straight through his body, if they don’t want to die and perform Seppuku the samurai becomes a Ronin which is a Samurai without a master or leader.

Knight and Samurai are different in many ways such as in weaponry,armor,beliefs,and training.The contrast is one is better and stronger than the other.A knight would win in a fit between the knight and the samurai.

Samurais and Knights were more similar than different in three wide areas. These areas included social position, training, armour, and honour and death. The feudal system was used to see who was lower and higher in society. Given the information from the feudal system, knights and samurais had about the same rank and were high in their society. Knights and Samurais were more towards the top. Both could gain land for protecting their lord if they gained enough land to take over they could also gain more power. Since both were meant to fight, Knights and Samurai had similar armour. Samurai were Japanese warriors, who wore armour made out of leather and masks over their head for protection. On the other side, knights were English warriors who wore a chain metal all over. They had

Critics would argue that the samurai and knights had more similarities than differences. However, they actually had more differences than similarities. The knights and samurai had many differences throughout their lives. Some of the differences were Military training and warfare. To begin with Military training started many differences for the Samurai and Knights.

The japanese feudal system and the European feudal systems were very similar but also very different. In japan Women had more rights than they did in europe, in europe women had very few rights. Both had social systems but those social systems worked very differently. In both Japanese and European feudal systems the samurai and knights were allowed to kill commoners. In japan they believed in shintoism and zen buddhism, while in europe they believed in Christianity.

Did you know samurai and knights are from two completely different places but have a lot in common? The roman empire fell and around the same time the imperial court was losing power. The emperor lost power in Japan and daimyos began to take over. I know this sounds crazy right ?Well it happened, and trust me the people apart this time period thought the same too. In my opinion the similarities between samurai and knights were greater than the differences. This will be shown throughout this essay and I think after this your thoughts on the similarities and differences will be the same as mine.

You may think knights and samurai don’t have a lot of differences? “To keep land in order that developed feudalism” lords gave land to nobles in return for them fighting.Knights and Samurai were at the bottom of the feudal system both were masses.The similarities between Samurai and Knights were not greater than the differences this can be shown by looking at these three area Codes of Honor,Views on Death and Life,and Armor.The first area of important differences was Codes of Honor.”loyal service to his master if he has one(soko)” “ to dishonor knighthood was a great disgrace(Malory)” . Samurai put duty above all disgracing knighthood was the worst being a knight was a privilege.These differences are significant because this shows. That Knights

The first similarity between Knights and Samurai is what they had to do to become a Knight or Samurai. They both began training during their childhood. To practice fighting, they used bamboo to learn the art of fencing. They both followed a strict code of honors and moral behaviors and had to swear to loyalty to their lords.