Samurai And Knights Dbq Research Paper

In my first reason, I believe that a knight would win against a samurai because a knight focused more on training and fighting

The entire Japanese culture is based on honor. Honor extends to the nation, the family, and the individual. The samurai are no exception to a code of honor. The samurai follow the code of bushido. Bushido is closer to the western term of chivalry. Bushido places emphasis on courage, benevolence, justice, politeness, truthfulness, honor, loyalty, and most importantly is self-control. The samurai's primary religion is Zen. The samurai adapted Zen easily due to the philosophy that fits closely to Buddhism. Samurai may act in the extreme when it comes to honor. They will kill anyone who may dishonor them or their lord. Nothing is worse to a samurai than to have corrupt dealings. Some of the warriors believed, "Honor is the power of deciding upon certain course of conduct in accordance with reason, without wavering … to die when it is right to die, to strike when to strike is right." Other warriors believed that "Honor is the bone that gives firmness and stature. As without bones the head cannot rest on top of the spine, nor hands move, nor feet stand, so without honor neither talent nor learning can make of a human frame a

The similarities between samurais and knights were greater than the differences due to the similarity in the hierarchy and the armor they used to protect themselves. The Samurai were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment.” They made up about 10% of Japan’s population. Similarly, knights were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for land.” (Document A) There were about 12,000 knights in England and Normandy, France in the 12th century. Even though Japan and Europe had no communication or access to each other, both areas placed the warrior classes in the middle of the hierarchy and owed loyalty/military services. This shows that the social order of both Feudal Japan and Feudal

Concrete detail.Knights believed in God.Most Knights were Christian in the form of catholic religion.Instead of churches they called them monasteries.Samurai believed in Buddha.Knights and Samurai believed in two totally different things. For example, Knights believed in a god named Jesus. On the other hand Samurai believed in a god named Buddha or Amida.Knights would give offering,go to church, and pray every day. Samurai gave food to Buddha and would say

Hey, Have you ever learned about the Samurai and Knights?? Well they had a few big similarities but lots of differences. Also in that era Samurai and Knights they had to be very loyal to their lord. I have a question for you. Were the similarities greater than the differences? No I don't think the similarities are greater than the differences between the Samurai and Knights. So no I think there are more differences than similarities. I’m going to be talking about the Samurai [Japanese Warrior] and Knights [European Warrior] is there Social position, Training and Armor, and Life and death.

A long time ago during the middle ages Europe and Japan both developed a class of warriors. These warriors were called Samurai and Knights all though these two warriors had different names and they knew nothing about each other. They both had a lot of Similarities for example there social position, their training, and their honor. They also had a lot of differences but their similarities were greater than their differences. This can be show by looking at three areas document A, B, and C.

The knight took a vow of the Knighthood. They had to promise no wicked deeds, be loyal to the king, mercy those who ask, be courteous and be helpful to the ladies. The loss of Knighthood would be a disgrace and that was a major thing back then. The samurai’s code consists of discharging loyal services to his master if the samurai has one. The one difference that samurais most of the time had a master and the knight didn't. The samurai was summarily punishes himself if he didn’t follow his warrior code. The samurai would stab himself with a seppuku, then another person would cut that a person's neck. They both have different rules they have to follow but the consequences were way different, the night would be a disgrace but the samurai would punish himself by killing himself. But the difference that was most different was their

One of the similarities between the Samurai and the knight in their roles in the community, Japanese samurais had to “fight in wars, obey and defend the shoguns or their country. " Medieval knights had to “fight in wars and be the king's personal weapon.” ( ????) . This shows that in their communities both samurais and knights main role was to protect and defend their leader. Another similarity between the two.

The knights and samurai of the Middle Ages were similar as a result of their codes of honor. Both codes of honor required a warrior to live an honorable life and should be vassals to their warlords. In Document E it is stated that one of Bushido’s most important requirements for a samurai is, “discharging loyal service to his master if he has one.” Document E also implies

Do you know what Knight's are? How about Samurai? In Europe and Japan they had Knights and Samurai. They needed them because they needed people to protect their land. The samurai were different then the knights. I think the samurai were different then the knights. The armor on the knights are different and the way of life is different.

Samurais and Knights were more similar than different in three wide areas. These areas included social position, training, armour, and honour and death. The feudal system was used to see who was lower and higher in society. Given the information from the feudal system, knights and samurais had about the same rank and were high in their society. Knights and Samurais were more towards the top. Both could gain land for protecting their lord if they gained enough land to take over they could also gain more power. Since both were meant to fight, Knights and Samurai had similar armour. Samurai were Japanese warriors, who wore armour made out of leather and masks over their head for protection. On the other side, knights were English warriors who wore a chain metal all over. They had

To start with, the samurai’s code of conduct, Bushido, and manner of battle, the Hoshi Formation being one of the most used. To illustrate, the Bushido Code, according to Cheryl Matrasko(©1999) was an unwritten moral code that all samurai had to follow, stating that, ”The unwritten Samurai code of conduct, known as Bushido, held that the true warrior must hold that loyalty, courage, veracity, compassion, and honor as important, above all else.” To explain, this code is similar and different from the Chivalry that european knights were familiar with. Although, the battle tactics of these two civilizations were incredibly different. Most of the European knights used only one raid/defense tactic: fight in one group, then break up into smaller

Samurai and Knights are very powerful warriors whose purpose was to protect people. This essay will discuss who would win in a battle. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in armor, training, and code of honor.

Imagine the powerful samurai of ancient Japan, fearsome and proud, bound by honor and duty. Then think of the courageous knights of medieval Europe, in shining suits of metal armor as they fight for their king and country, battling for the honor of fair maidens. These two images aren’t usually connected in one’s mind, but they have a great deal in common. Samurai were common in Japan from the early 1600s to the late 1800s, while knights frequented Europe throughout the Medieval Ages, otherwise referred to as the Middle Ages. Samurai and knights are connected through their positions in feudal society, similar training, and overlapping codes of honor.

Knights and Samurai they have a lot in common, don't you think? They may seem so similar, but they are also different in many ways. When it comes to their views of things, and how they're expected to act. Their behavior, their views of education, and even their views of women. First off, their Code of Conduct.