Samurai Dbq Analysis

Samurai and Knights are warriors fighting and serving for their lord. Samurai and knights are both trained, physically and mentally to fight for their lords, however while in a battle, strategies of both make it hard to distinguish who would win. While both warriors are very similar in many ways, Samurais differences such as their, training, weapons, and armor give them big advantages.

From approximately 1000 - 1600 CE, knights in Europe and samurai in Japan were the professional warrior class. In Europe, the knight wore obscenely heavy armor and used large swords. In Japan, they wore a little bit lighter armor and used the famed samurai sword. To start off, The similarities outweigh the differences between the samurai and the knights.

A samurai is a very tough opponent towards a knight if they were to create a battle. The knight would overpower the samurai in the end because of their abilities and movement they have versus the samurai and their weapons as well.

Knights are the European warriors that go into battle to protect their kingdom. Meanwhile, samurai defend and protect Japan and its people. If the two warriors were to go to battle or war, I think that a samurai would win. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai t= and this can be seen in the samurai code, armor/training, and training.

The similarities between samurais and knights were greater than the differences due to the similarity in the hierarchy and the armor they used to protect themselves. The Samurai were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment.” They made up about 10% of Japan’s population. Similarly, knights were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for land.” (Document A) There were about 12,000 knights in England and Normandy, France in the 12th century. Even though Japan and Europe had no communication or access to each other, both areas placed the warrior classes in the middle of the hierarchy and owed loyalty/military services. This shows that the social order of both Feudal Japan and Feudal

The first reason that the samurai would be the victor in battle is that there armor, and weapons were more efficient. The samurai wore 8-12 pieces iron helmet, with a neck guard and lacquered metal that protects most of their body, and created a sort of shell. “Samurai did not wear armor on their right arm so they could easily draw their bow.”(Source 2). This strategy allowed the samurai to simply reach their arrows which when shoot were deadly precise. There armor was also far lighter than the knights making them more agile. One downside to there armor was that when it became wet the

While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in their training, weapons, and beliefs. The first way samurais have an advantage is in their training. In document C1 taken from a show on PBS it says. “The rigorous training of samurai began when they were children.” This shows that the samurai have been training from a very young age.

Have you ever wondered who would win a battle between the European Knights and Japanese Samurai? Or how different or similar they were, they were very similar in some ways and different in many more. In my opinion, I believe these warriors were very much different they were different in 3 clear reasons! One, their views of death, two their codes of honor and three the way their armour looked like and how it was designed. The differences between the knights and samurai are greater than most realize.

As the Samurai fought to protect his emperor, he knew that he might die, but he didn't care. The Japanese Samurai and the European Knights both used Feudalism in their government system in the Medieval times. They both protected their land and the people who lived in it. Samurai are superior because of their Protection, Structure, and Beliefs. Samurai are superior because of their protection.

For Japan and Europe, it was a time of trouble…Document “In the late 400’s both Europe and Japan created a feudal system in order to keep peace in the land. Lords acquired large estates of land. They granted some of their lands to lesser nobles, whom promised to fight when conflicts arose.” Background Essay DBQ. So where the similarities greater, or were the differences greater? The samurai and knights were more similar than different in three broad areas, social position, training and armor and the code of honor.

The first reason why the differences are greater than the similarities is because of the social order in feudal Japan and Europe. ”Historians and other scholars use social pyramids to show how societies were structured” (Document A). The samurai owned loyalty and military service to daimyo 's for land or regular payment while on the other hand knights owned loyalty and military service to the lords. Another difference about samurais and knights was the population. Samurai with families took about 10% of Japan 's population and in Europe, there was estimated 12,000 knights in England and Normany France in the 12th century. One more difference is that there are four people above the knight in the social order but only three for samurai.

From researching about knights and samurai, I believe that in a battle between a knight and samurai, the knight would have a greater chance in winning. This is because knights focused more on fighting techniques and how to improve them, rather than focusing on spiritual beliefs and traditions as well, which is what the samurai did. The knights also had very strong and good armour which helped a lot in battles, while the samurai’s armour changed a lot but wasn’t ever as effective as the knight’s armour. The knight’s weapons were also more advanced and better then the samurai weapons.

In a fight between the most fierce and strongest warrior, none other than a clash between a Samurai and knight are a perfect match waiting to happen. Both are very similar but could one stand out and have the upper hand in a battle. With their abilities, who would have the most advantage out of the two in battle. While knights and Samurai have an abundance of corresponding qualities, in a one to one battle, the advantage would go to the Samurai and the can be recognized by their training, weapon, and moral codes.

Samurai and knights are not identical, they do have a good amount of differences. For instance, after going through training, samurai were awarded their title and responsibilities at the age of fourteen while knights took on their full responsibilities at twenty-one. Document B points out that although loyalty was important to both Japanese and European warriors, “loyalty towards the feudal lord in Japan was hereditary” but it was not in Europe. This means that in Japan “service of a feudal lord went from father to son” so the relationship between the lord and his warrior lasted for generations. Along with that, although both groups wore full body armor, Document D states that “a knight’s armor could weigh forty

The Knights of Europe and the Samurai of Japan shared quite a few similarities; however, they do also share many differences. One such similarity would be that both the Knights and the Samurais were brave, strong, and loyal to their cause, especially due to both of their trainings starting at a very young age. An example of a difference would be the samurais having a much lighter armor than knights. This allowed for a more agile army. They also ascended to their titles at separate ages, with samurais being at a mere 14 years of age, and knights being 21.