Samurai Vs Feudal Knights

The first reason why the differences are greater than the similarities is because of the social order in feudal Japan and Europe. ”Historians and other scholars use social pyramids to show how societies were structured” (Document A). The samurai owned loyalty and military service to daimyo 's for land or regular payment while on the other hand knights owned loyalty and military service to the lords. Another difference about samurais and knights was the population. Samurai with families took about 10% of Japan 's population and in Europe, there was estimated 12,000 knights in England and Normany France in the 12th century. One more difference is that there are four people above the knight in the social order but only three for samurai.

The armor that the samurai wore was light because was mostly made from bamboo with small parts made of cloth and metal. Because it was so light it made movement easy unlike the knight’s armor. They were good for hand to hand combat, particularly for samurai's precise and quick movements. samurai's could fight both on horse and on foot fairly easily. They were extremely skilled in hand to hand combat and a range of other fighting skills.

Knights and samurai had different types of weapons and armor.Knights used bows and arrows,swords,maces and axes.The Samurai used everyday objects,spears and bows and arrows.The difference is significant because it shows that how we can created such thing in the world with little knowledge that someone else has the same idea too.,

First of all, the samurais and knights were similar in the area of social position. As shown in Document A, samurais and knights were similar in status and rank in the middle of the social pyramid.” As seen in Document A, “They both showed loyalty to their lords.” A difference is that the samurai were hereditary while

To start, the samurai’s light armor made him very quick on the battlefield. His armor, “provided both mobility and protection,” (Source 3), as opposed to a knight’s armor which was very heavy and only provided protection. If the two warriors were fighting from horseback, all the samurai would have to do is find a way to get the knight to the ground. Once on the ground, knights were very vulnerable, especially to those as quick on foot as the samurai. The light weight of the samurai's armor was not the only advantage he had over the knight. The many perfectly placed attached guards, (in contrast to the knights few parts) made moving naturally smooth. There was only one disadvantage to

Have you ever wondered how it would feel back then with the with knights and samurais? Summaries and knights have very little in common, but have much more difference. In Europe knights were hired because the central government lost their power. Warlords fought each other to see who would have the most territory. The Western Roman Empire had fallen in the late 400s, leaving the continent divided and the weak kingdoms apart. Japan had found itself in pieces, but most people kept the land in order by a system called feudalism. There were two types of Warriors. First there were Europe's Warriors called the knights, and there was Japan's Warriors called samurais. The Minamoto won the Civil War later set up a new government, and the head of the government was the Shogun. Each ruled the county in the name of the emperor, but the shogun had more power then the emperor. Europe had a different leader and that was the pope. Knights developed a code of behavior called Chivalry. A samurai developed a code of honor called

Each wore heavy armor and carried in their respective weapon of choice. A knight’s armor was built out of chain mail and was usually plated as well. The Samurai’s armor consisted of an outer layer that was built out of strong iron, while the layer underneath was made out of leather. Each warrior carried their own sword as well as a secondary weapon. The knight would would often be armed with a lance along with his sword, while the samurai would be armed with a bow and arrow along with his sword.

The Japanese samurais started training at the of 5 and roughly finished at the age of 15. One of the differences between the Japanese samurai and the medieval knights was their armour. The amour between knights and samurais were very different. “ Knights wore armour made from metal links and used swords.” On the other

Surprisingly, almost 1000 years ago people in two societies halfway across the world both created a system that historians call feudalism. These two societies were Japan and Europe. From approximately 1000 to 1600 AD Japan and Europe both had a class of professional warriors; Japan had samurai and Europe, knights. Both societies had codes that they had to follow: Japan used bushido, and Europe had chivalry. Their training was rigorous, and their armor was protective. Without a doubt, the evidence supports that the similarities between samurai and knights were greater than the differences, especially in the codes, armor, training, and feudal systems.

Katana swords were a long swords, which the Samurai thought to have an emblem of power. Knights also used swords and bow and arrows. Knights wore metal armour and the Samurai wore leather and bamboo armour. They both used these weapons to fight and train. They trained very hard to protect their team and to fight for themselves.

There are many similarities between the samurai of medieval Japan and the knights of medieval Europe, especially considering their training, armor, and codes. In documents A and B, it explains that they both began training in childhood, used artificial swords to practice to fight, and that they were both spiritual. However, the samurai wrote poetry and studied Zen Buddhism whereas, the knights learned to ride ponies and the pages became a squire at 14 and then became a knight at 21. Document B states that,¨By the age of 14, pages were eligible to become a squire.If a squire gained approval from an examining knight, he would usually become a knight at around the age of 21. Another similarity in Documents C and D is that they both wore helmets

In the first paragraph, I will be focusing on the weapons and armor on both, knights and samurai.The samurai had armor that was made up of layers of metal and leather, that was held together by silk. Their weapons were a katana and a wakizashi sword. The samurai’s main weapon was a katana, which was their most important weapon. The wakizashi was the sword finished of the work of the katana.The samurai's armor was actually really good, unlike the armor that the European knights. The knight’s armor was very important to them, the better the armor was then, the knight was more important. It was made up of garments, iron plate, and chainmail. The armor had to be perfect fitting, if not it would be extremely. dangerous for the knight to fight like

The knights and samurai of the Middle Ages were similar as a result of their codes of honor. Both codes of honor required a warrior to live an honorable life and should be vassals to their warlords. In Document E it is stated that one of Bushido’s most important requirements for a samurai is, “discharging loyal service to his master if he has one.” Document E also implies

All kinds of warriors have existed throughout history. Medieval Europe had warriors called Knights. Likewise, early Japan had warriors called Samurai. These warriors followed codes of honor that led their lives. These codes were named Bushido and Chivalry. Bushido for Samurai and Chivalry for Knights. They were both paid for their services by their Lords. Lords are vassals to a greater rank. At an early age, both Knights and Samurai received training. The Samurai of Japan and the Knights of Europe were more similar than they were different. This essay will prove that there are more similarities between Knights and Samurai than there are differences.

Medieval Samurai and Knights had many differences. Today, I will discuss the differences between Knight and Samurai armor.