Samurai Vs Knights Research Paper

The Knights of Europe and the Samurai of Japan shared quite a few similarities; however, they do also share many differences. One such similarity would be that both the Knights and the Samurais were brave, strong, and loyal to their cause, especially due to both of their trainings starting at a very young age. An example of a difference would be the samurais having a much lighter armor than knights. This allowed for a more agile army. They also ascended to their titles at separate ages, with samurais being at a mere 14 years of age, and knights being 21.

Samurai and knights are not identical, they do have a good amount of differences. For instance, after going through training, samurai were awarded their title and responsibilities at the age of fourteen while knights took on their full responsibilities at twenty-one. Document B points out that although loyalty was important to both Japanese and European warriors, “loyalty towards the feudal lord in Japan was hereditary” but it was not in Europe. This means that in Japan “service of a feudal lord went from father to son” so the relationship between the lord and his warrior lasted for generations. Along with that, although both groups wore full body armor, Document D states that “a knight’s armor could weigh forty

My second reason is that the knights had very strong and effective armour, whereas the samurai’s armour was always changing and was never as good as the knight’s armour, as samurai depended more on their fighting skills instead of the armour. The samurai armour was made up of several sections. The main body is called a do or cuirass, and is made from plates or lamellae (small oblong-shaped pieces of steel linked by strips of leather and covered with layers of lacquer). The helmet has a crest and a hair pommel. There is also a face mask, which would have been decorated with ugly features intended to scare the enemy. Extra protection is provided by a coverage of the neck (made of jointed metal) and shoulder guards (made from small plates laced together, with silk allowing movement). Thigh and calf guards are made from a combination of chain mail and plates. Underneath the samurai’s armour, the samurai would wear a one-piece baggy garment with a special kimono (the kimono looks a bit like a dressing gown). This did mean that the samurai would be more likely to get injured, as the armour would only offer very little protection. Samurai armour was designed to help the Samurai move comfortably and efficiently when fighting, so if a knight stabbed the samurai then the samurai would get injured and this would affect the samurai while he is fighting (the samurai would be fighting worse), and possible depending on how bad the wound is, it could kill the

If the samurai was knocked down though he would be able to get up faster and better. This is because the samurai had lighter armor than the knights that allows them to pull back bow string. The knights can’t so that’s why they use melee weapons

Likewise, knights wore “complete suits of plate armor, constructed from metal...wore helmets, gloves, and shoes of steel...a knight’s armor could weigh 40 to 60 pounds.” (Document D) Both samurais and European knights were protected by a heavy armor out of metal in battle; it can be inferred that both Japan and Europe found importance in protecting their warriors looking from the stringency of armor and protection. The reason for protecting their warriors would be due to the myriad of battles feudal Japan and Europe would have had to carry out. To ensure success in battle, they would’ve made further technological advances such as protective armor, ensuring better performance when battling. By protecting the warriors using this effective armor, both Japan and Europe would’ve been able to attain more as a whole and advance as a civilization - a common achievement carried out as well. Despite the many differences between Japanese samurais and European knights, the similarities outweighed these differences due to the homologous elements in their position in hierarchy and the use of protective armor in battle, leading to the success in both Japan and

Hey, Have you ever learned about the Samurai and Knights?? Well they had a few big similarities but lots of differences. Also in that era Samurai and Knights they had to be very loyal to their lord. I have a question for you. Were the similarities greater than the differences? No I don't think the similarities are greater than the differences between the Samurai and Knights. So no I think there are more differences than similarities. I’m going to be talking about the Samurai [Japanese Warrior] and Knights [European Warrior] is there Social position, Training and Armor, and Life and death.

You are a child at the age of 17 being trained by your master. He has taught you many things. Soon you will become a samurai. How do you feel about becoming part of the Japanese army? The time of the knights and the samurai took place at the same time. These people served for their country to help provide protection from enemy armies. They both developed feudalism to keep the land in order. The three ways that the knights and the samurai are more different than the same are: Their code of honor, their type of armor, and their training.

According to to series “Warrior Challenge”, “A prospective Knight’s Training ( began at age four or five) with learning to ride a pony. By the age or seven or eight, he would be sent to server as a page to his father’s overlord or to a powerful relative.” ( Doc. C) He would spend time learning about horsemanship, archery, and swordsmanship. Around the age of 21 is when they are able to become an official knight and from there on they would live their live according to the Code of chivalry. According to a series “Japan: Memoirs of a Secret Empire”, Samurai training would start during childhood as well. “ School was a unique combinations of physical training.. poetry and spiritual discipline. The young warriors studied kendo, the moral code of the samurai, and Zen Buddhism. At about the age of 14 the trainees officially became samurai in a ceremony called Genpuku. Samurai were expected to live according to Bushido.” ( Doc. C) Samurai and knights both began training in their childhoods, they trained for many years to become apart of the warrior class, and they received some religious and moral

In document D, written by the DBQ Project, it states “Not only was their entire body covered… even horses wore armor.” This shows that a knight could win in a battle because they were completely covered in protection. They wore helmets, gloves, and shoes made from steel. This was helpful because they wouldn’t get hurt as easily. Also, their swords were shorter, much easier to move in the air, and they had amazingly sharp sides that can do some serious damage. Another piece of evidence is from the same document, which says “Samurai did not wear armor on their right arm… One disadvantage of samurai armor is that when it became wet, the silk cords absorbed water and became very heavy.” This makes it beyond difficult for the samurai to get around because most of the Earth is water, and Japan is an island. Since they didn’t wear armor on one part of their body, it is much easier for them to get hurt, especially since the knights’ swords were so advanced. The knights’ armor was better than the samurais’ for fighting in a lot of ways, but there are still other advantages that the knights might have

Lastly, by looking at these soldiers armors, the differences are noticable. Samurai wore small iron scales woven together with silk or leather, while knights completely covered themselves in metal armor. However, it is evident that despite the differences, both of these armors would cover most of their bodies, and offered great protection (Document “D”). All in all, training and armor made warriors who they are, and it wasn’t quite different for samurai and

In document C1 written by PBS it says “The rigorous training of samurai began when they were children”. Samurai started training at a young age, so they are a lot more prepared and experienced. Another piece of evidence that supports the claim is in document C1 written by PBS it says "In their schooling they had physical training and learned poetry and spiritual discipline. Along with leaning to be strong and how to defend themselves, they also learned about poetry and learned to become spiritually disciplined. Another advantage along with training and strategy is the

The samurai have been known to be very agile if compared to the knights, A quote that proves this is from Source 3 and it states that “A knight's armor could weigh approximately 100 pounds. ”(Yue 1) The armor weighing this much can prove to be a great disadvantage when the times comes for the fight on foot to occur. Source 3 also states that “Samurai did not wear armor on their right arm…”(Yue 1 )

The samurai got there first sword when they were born and was taught buddhism at a young age and went to samurai training school. Like the knights they would learn under a master which would teach them a number of strengths. Then in the following years they endured many hardships to test their strengths. “To help them learn to endure pain and suffering, young samurai boys were subjected to physical hardships such as fasting, marching barefoot in the snow and maintaining rigid postures for long periods.”(Source 4). Then finally at age 13 they were taught to use a sword and truly become a samurai. Though you could argue that the knights method of training was just as efficient. The samurai training method really tested the strength of the warrior and prepared him for the hardships of the

Samurais and knights are different in many ways, but they are also very similar in some ways as well. First of all, training. Samurais and knights both start training during childhood, and they both used artificial swords. The samurai, however train differently in some ways by learning poetry and Kendo as well! At the age of 14, the training samurais would officially become a samurai in a ceremony called Genpuku. Knights would usually become a squire at the age of 14 with all the knowledge on how to ride a horse. Both samurai and knights showed loyalty to their master. According to Document A, it says,”School was a unique combination of physical training, poetry, and spiritual discipline.” You can see that the samurai training was alike in many ways but also different in ways compared to the knight training.

Did you know that the Samurai practiced self-discipline, self sacrifice, obedience, skill, honor, and bravery. The Samurai were Japanese that lived in Japan and the Knights were European warriors that lived in Europe. They both lived more than a thousand years ago. Critics would say that the Samurai and Knights have more similarities, however they had way more differences. The Samurai and Knights had many differences throughout their lives. Military training was a big difference between both groups of warriors. Another big difference was the warfare they both wore.