San Clemente Marine Safety Essay

I chose the Coast Guard for my military choice. The Coast Guard was established on August 4, 1790. The Coast Guard has a large difference compared to other military branches, the Coast Guard is directly related to Homeland Security, which means they also protect and look out for attacks and terrorism attempts against the country. There are many different careers inside the Coast Guard such as pilot, flight crew, medical staff, navel officers and many more. The career I would be most interested in would be a navel officer. Their main jobs are to control the rest of the crew on deck. The Coast Guard is in charge of the safety of the coast and the guarding all of the waters surrounding us. Anyone attempting to join Coast Guard must be able to

There are, of course, grey areas within this debate.  It is appropriate that any social media post that identifies the individual’s employer is of justified interest to that employer.  However, where an individual discusses work situations without identifying the employer it is perhaps harder to justify this intrusion.  The obvious line here is that companies should, by and large, restrict themselves to monitoring mentions of their brand or senior executives and should stay away from monitoring individual staff names on their own unless otherwise justified.

As employers increasingly turn to the Internet for additional information on prospective employees, the ethical implications behind such practice become more relevant and far reaching. Yet in ethically examining the advantages and disadvantages of using social media information to make decisions for Shaw, the result could be different based on different ethical approaches. This paper will address the issue from different ethical perspectives. While it is crucial for employers to know who they are hiring, it is unethical to rely on unconsented social media information in making hiring decision.

Employers on our social media, this is a fact that everyone in this age accepts but do not necessarily like or want. Some people say it is okay to check social media when looking for who to hire, but this infringes on privacy rights. If an employer finds something discriminating on a profile and decides not to hire the person this is not okay, even though some may say it is because you want to know what you are getting into. An employer could find information that was not even true on social media, this would not work in favor of employment. It is not okay to check social media when employers are hiring because it invades privacy, discriminates and the information provided on the site could be false.

Although the Privacy Act and PIPEDA exist to regulate what personal information is collected in order to protect the employee, these legal means are not enough. The common thread between the two is that the information collected should be collected and used for the stated purposes. The Privacy Act applies to federal institutions, whereas PIPEDA applies to the private-sector, yet neither specifically state social media. As mentioned in this article, the person’s privacy rights should not end simply because the technological advancements are not incorporated into our legislation. However, privacy laws should be able to incorporate social media as it is one of society’s most common method of communication. As society changes, our laws should accommodate. I believe the current criteria are not specific enough, if just cause can be proven and if there is no discrimination, that is seen to be enough for termination. I think that the better option would be the proposal set in this article.

So I ask, is it right or wrong ethical for employer to access employee’s social media page? One con of this is that an employee may not be able to express themselves without the fear of being dismissed. From the selection “Fired up or just fired,” Rhonda has an explanation and research results on cons of the connectivity of having employers as “friend”, “recent study of companies with 1,000 employees found that 8% of their employees have actually been dismissed for their

Many companies and their employers have been pushing the boundaries of surveillance causing workers to feel uncomfortable in their workplace. These employers are trying to protect the company while getting rid of unfit workers at the same time however, by being suspicious of every worker, it causes an uneasy environment. In order to make sure that a bad employee cannot get away with anything that will damage the company, employers have been asking to see their social media. Not only do they ask to see their social media but some have even asked for the passwords to their personal accounts. In the online article, “Companies Require Facebook Password During Interview” by Suzanne Stratford, Stratford speaks about companies asking possible future employees to give their Facebook passwords to them.

The study was carried out in San Clemente Island (SCI; 118° 30’ W, 33° 00’ N), the southernmost of the California Channel Islands, located approximately 109 km west of San Diego, California (Fig. XX). The SCI is under the administration and management of U.S. Navy and is not open to civilians, except by the permission of the naval authorities. The island covers 14,764 ha (147.64 km2) area extending 34 km north-south and ranges in width from 2.5-6.5 km. The diverse topography of the island (a steeply sloping eastern side and gently sloping marine terraces of western side), is the result of tectonic and climatic dynamics (Raab and Yatsko 2009), which produce a greater spatial variability in temperature, wind, rainfall, and fog (Moody 2000). The island experiences an arid Mediterranean-type climate characterised by cool, wet winters and hot, dry summers. It receives an average of 130 mm of rainfall annually (U.S. Dept. of the Navy 2002) with most precipitation (95%) between November and April, the wet season (Yoho et al. 1999). Temperatures are relatively moderate throughout the year with average mean summer and winter temperatures of 18°C and 14°C, respectively. Soil are predominantly clayey and fine loamy with Vertisols morphology (Muhs et al. 2007).

When you post something on social media people can get easily offended on things you may not even realize is offensive which could cost you your job. Say if you post something on your social media about getting a new dog, and your employer’s religion forbids anyone from animal captivity. Your employer may get offended and not want you in the job, but thankfully there’s a law against this in Article 1 paragraph 3 “ In certain cases, an employer who is offended by an employee’s social media posts may not be able to use them against the employee.”So what that means if someone is offended and you didn’t know the law you wouldn't be hired at all. That’s why employers shouldn’t check your social media since some personal offenses can cause you

Should our employers or government monitor our social media and cell phone usage? This is a topic that many people face, especially if they are employed by a large corporation or a government agency. This has become a very touchy subject for many, as they believe it is a violation of their privacy.

"Privacy. There seems to be no legal issue today that cuts so wide a swath through conflicts confronting American society: from AIDS tests to wiretaps, polygraph test to computerized data bases, the common denominator has been whether the right to privacy outweighs other concerns of society…" This quote from Robert Ellis Smith explains, in one sentence, the absolute need to ensure privacy in the workplace. One of the most interesting, yet controversial, areas concerning public personnel is employee privacy. What limits are there to employers’ intrusions into, and control over, employees’ behaviors and personal properties?

These past two months has given Japan quite the scare as ghost ships carrying dead bodies are appearing on the coast. Coastguards are trying to solve this chilling mystery of where these boats came from and what happened to their passengers. The Coastguard believes that the boats are from North Korea, with Korean lettering, a piece of fabric that could come from Korea’s national flag and even the name of Korea’s military defense force found on or in the boat. One possible explanation is that the boats are heavy and old, something that makes them go slow and makes turning and navigating even harder, another explanation is that the boats are simply fishing boats that strayed off course, but the most common theory is that the boats are Korean

One of the most interesting, yet controversial areas concerning employment is that of privacy. Employers and employees alike are trying to discern what limits should a company have over intrusions into, and claims over employees’ behaviors and personal properties. The advent of the

Social networking sites such as Twitter or Facebook have created a new ethical dilemma for many businesses. Corporations, small businesses, and even universities are struggling create policies to manage their employees social networking behaviors. Social networking access, particularly for recruiters, can provide personal information about potential employees, which would otherwise not be available. A business must follow statutes and guidelines when disclosing information to the public. Individuals on social networking sites have no such constraints. Employees can and do make comments about their employers online. Employers can and do watch what employees post online. Any individual can send or post potentially damaging information

Australia is one of the main coal producing countries in the world, ranking the first in coal export and the fourth in the coal production in 2012 (International Energy Agency 2012). On global scale, coal accounted for a third of primary energy needs and 41.1% of electricity generation in 2014, when its production reached 8022.5 Mt (World Coal Association 2015).