Sanctuary Cities Essay

“Senate Bill 4 is a piece of legislation that Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed in May and it aims to ban “sanctuary cities” by requiring sheriffs, constables, police chiefs and other local leaders to cooperate with federal immigration authorities and allows police to ask about the immigration status of individuals they lawfully detain” (Alvarez). The consequences for sheriffs, constables, police chiefs and other local leaders if they do not follow the legislation are that they could face Class A misdemeanor and possibly jail time (Mansoor & Pollock). “In addition, they can could face civil penalties ranging from $1,000 to $1,500 for the first violation and $25,000 to 25,500 for consecutive offenses” (Alvarez). Many people are against Senate

One of the most talked about bills is TX Senate Bill 4. SB4, often referred to as a “Sanctuary City ban,” has already been signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott. SB4 requires local law enforcement, including campus police, to comply with the requests of federal immigration

Last week the City of Ithaca passed an ordinance to make the city a Sanctuary City. Local Congressman Tom Reed says sanctuary cities are not the right approach. "We should be focusing on the root cause of the problem, it's a border that's not functioning, that needs to be enforced to keep our American citizens safe so she has a safe environment upon which to thrive and achieve the American dream. So I think if we can adopt that common ground, if we can adopt that vision we can unite and solve the problem that is the root cause of this and thats

As Donald Trump’s presidency unfolds his promise to crack down on immigration and cut funding to sanctuary cities is becoming a reality, however, each city is handling it differently. Throughout his campaign, Donald Trump promised to crack down on illegal immigrants and “sanctuary cities”. Sanctuary city is a vague term that is being thrown around right now. It loosely refers to a towns or cities that don’t immediately turn over illegals who commit small crimes, and don’t cooperate fully with immigration services (“Sanctuary Cities: Top 3 Pros and Cons”). Most Texas cities have vowed to remain loyal to their citizens, and not rip families apart due to politics and money. Cutting federal funding to a city is not an

Constitution. New federal laws have buckled down on immigration, however this does not affect sanctuary cities. Sanctuary cities do not have to follow the exaggerated immigration laws, due to the tenth amendment. The tenth amendment separates federal and state powers, meaning that the states have jurisdiction in sanctuary cities. Referencing the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, the Amendment prevents the “federal government from coercing state or local governments to use their resources to enforce a federal regulatory program …” Similarly to how the tenth amendment protects sanctuary cities from federal law, it also protects them from the federal government attempting to force sanctuary cities to provide information. For this reason, sanctuary cities keep a “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. In addition to the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, sanctuary cities are protected another way. The Immigrant Legal Resource Center assures that, “Congress cannot compel state or local governments to collect immigration status information in order to share it with the federal government.” The “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy refers to the sanctuary cities version of not collecting data. Without collecting data, these cities are never in violation of federal law. There is very limited record keeping done in these cities, which works in tandem with the don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. Therefore, the tenth amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects sanctuary cities from the federal government in enforcing federal law, forcing private information from the cities, and protecting the citizens of these cities with a “don’t ask, don’t tell”

Furthermore Jan C. ting asserts cities are able to challenge states laws regarding immigration but that “those laws enacted by Congress under the authority of the U.S. Constitution need to be respected and enforced.” This goes to show that if cities remain sanctuary than they are defining and going against the authority of the U.S. Constitution. The defiance leads to a questioning on the constitutional progress of the country. And they would be defying the Presidents orders. If the cities do decide

With important issues occurring every hour these days, more questions are being asked with them. One of those issues is Sanctuary Cities. A Sanctuary city is a city in which State and Local government do not follow immigration policy and do not actively seek and deport undocumented immigrants. Some could find that this Local policy hurts all Americans. Some could find this a moral obligation as a citizen of the United States. But by any means this topics has major implications to President Trumps policies and Federalism. And with these cities becoming more mainstream, question are becoming more relevant to other parts of government. There are direct effects on issues like cities health program, fight against opioids, and other local

[A]Sanctuary city is a name given to a city in the United States that follows

Many supporters of repatriation think that, "With at least 8 million illegal aliens living in the United States and nearly one million new aliens arriving each year, the potential for terrorists entering the United States undetected is high."(ProCon.org). Many think all immigrants should be deported due to their threat to society, but this is not true. A study in California concluded, "The foreign-born, who make up roughly 35% of California's adult population, constitute 17% of the state prison population." (Riley). Thus, it is evident that illegal immigrants do not pose an immediate threat to safety. Furthermore, repatriation will not solve the issue concerning the connection between immigration and crime. There will always be avenues for criminals to smuggle illegal contraband into the country, thus it would be more effective and practical to secure the borders. This way it would be easier to find potential terrorists and criminals, and still allow other immigrants to contribute to the workforce. Therefore, there is no need to deport the millions of innocent immigrants looking for a better life due to the possibility of criminals or

In 2010, there were 11.2 million undocumented and illegal immigrants in the United States, making it a serious political and economic issue (Cebula, 2016). There are certain cities in the United States that do not have specific policies for illegal immigrants. Sanctuary cities are cities, counties, states, or local jurisdictions that limit how local law enforcement and federal immigration agents cooperate with another, as well as, do not ask about a person’s immigration status (Lee et al, 2014). After researching about sanctuary cities, it seems that the sanctuary cities allow illegal immigrants to get away with crime, serving little to no jail time. If someone from the United States was to commit a crime in another country, there is not a such thing as a sanctuary city.

The idea of Sanctuary City is pleasant however achieving the goal to become one is difficult to accomplish. Solidarity Among Borders proves to tackle the issues relating to the detainment and oppression of undocumented workers and refugees or those who don't have a full status (citizenship or permanent residence) from law enforcement. Ever since Montreal has declared themselves a sanctuary city, they have been following closely and have found that the declaration does not match up with the actions of the city and law enforcement. There is one particular response made by Solidarity Across Borders which explains what needs to be put in place for Montreal to better accommodate undocumented immigrants and refugees. They explain how the declaration implies that the city of Montreal needs to have non-cooperation with the Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) in order to defend and protect those who are

The U.S Customs and Border Security needs to secure the borders and deport Illegals because when they are here illegally, things change because they are not planned for and they increase crime rate. With illegal immigrants here, there will be a misallocation of funds because immigrants will keep getting services not planned for them for example in a California Hospital where healthcare for illegal immigrants’ costs state taxpayers over $1 billion a year and this has caused 84 hospitals around California to close. If illegals have a baby in the US that baby is a US citizen and that can lead to a high birth rate and overpopulation. When the parents come to the US and have their kids brought to the US by coyotes (a person who smuggles Latin Americans across the United States border most times for a very high fee) that endangers the kids because the coyotes often abuse the kids. There is also a problem with high/increased population rate especially in schools and universities and in the long run, this ends up being costly on the Government since some illegals that don't speak English in schools get translators for the students that the Government pays for. Illegal immigration also hurts the U.S. economy because the taxpayers have to pay for the benefits that the illegals get and yet when the illegals get jobs, some of them are taking jobs that could be for American citizens. In an article written by Jon Greenberg, he

You may be asking how these illegals have been affecting our National Security. Well for starters, when these immigrants come state side we have no idea why they are coming here, who they are bringing with them, or what they are bringing with them. We also don’t have any clue to how they are getting access to our country either. So these two issues could have the potential to cause significant issues for our country. For example these people could be smuggling in illegal drugs or possibly even weapons. Even though our boarders have the potential to let in drugs and weapons, these could possibly be the worst of our worries in some cases. Another threat that illegal immigration through our boarders poses is that these holes within the boarders

As a result of illegal immigration to developed countries, the crime rate has raised along with some societal issues. The very first subject that sticks out when entering a developed country, is homeless people who are residing under the bridges or sleeping in the parks. Germany, for example, is a good sample. Recently because of Syria war, a huge number of people ran away from their homeland and became fugitive in Germany with hope of finding a better job. People now is do anything (such as selling drugs, pick-pocketing) to make a living. Furthermore, some German people have raped by this immigrants. Thus, this is obvious that, not only do illegal immigrants have made critical issues, but they have put the social safety at a serious risk.

Community policing is a policy and a strategy aimed at achieving more effective and efficient crime control, reduced fear of crime, improved quality of life, improved police services and police legitimacy, through a proactive reliance on community resources that seeks to change crime causing conditions. This assumes a need for greater accountability of police, greater public share in decision-making and greater concern for civil rights and liberties.