Sandiel Banks: Case Study Of Interview In The Sandlein Banks Case

Research on interviews has generally shown that standardized procedures are higher in their reliability and validity than unstructured interviews. Learning how structured

Furthermore, the researchers have obviously stated and justified that data was meaningfully gathered using a semi-structured interview where prompts and probing questions techniques were used to guide the participants. According to Wilson (2012) that 'semi-structured interviews allow for more flexibility. They involve having a set of guiding questions that

A structured interview can improve the process by asking the same questions to each candidate.

how the questions are answered. Your goal in choosing an interviewee is to simulate the interaction

INTERVIEWS: Interviews are usually taken for people when they are looking for jobs or looking places in college and universities. There are many advantages of interviews, one being that they will be able to get good information and some data, also they will develop their communication skills too when talking to the other individual. However there are also many weaknesses such as, time consuming, the person being interviewed could be lying and also the questions may not be clear. Another weakness is that there could be a language barrier between the two

Structured interviews are where the interviewer has already pre-planned the questions that they will use in the interview. This is useful because the interview can be repeated, as the questions are standardised.

Unstructured interviews tend to be unreliable and they are often not job related. These are going to be used to get a more general idea of what the individual is like. I will be starting off with these questions first then go into my structured questions.

Interview: the advantage of face to face interviews is that the researcher can adapt the questions as necessary, clarify doubt and ensure that the responses are properly understood, by repeating or rephrasing the questions. The researcher can also pick up non-verbal clues from the respondent through the body language.

Structured Interviews where the rater is trained to consistently use the same rating scales to evaluate the responses results in a reliable and valid assessment method and is weighted at .6. Properly implemented structured interviews can reduce adverse impact and annualized turnover.

Interviews can provide much more information and detail as the interviewer can spend far longer with the person and ask them questions based on their responses.

Structured interviews are when the interview asks each respondent the same series of questions. Questions are created prior to the interview, and would often have a limited set of responses (Rowley, 2012). Semi-structured interviews are when the interviewer and the interviewee engage in a formal interview. The interviewer develops and used an interview guide. This is a list of questions and topics that would need to be covered during the conversation (Rowley, 2012). These questions of often asked in an order. The interviewer follows the guide but may stray away from the guide when they would feel that they need to ask different

Unstructured: This interviews can be seen as a very difficult interview to stay in control of, starting out the interview with questions prepared but then can changed from script depending on the responses given out, usually completed successfully by a highly skilled interviewee.

However, this method also has some drawbacks. First of all, it requires the interviewer has enough interviewing techniques. Interviewer can drive the sentiment of interviewee, and maintain a neutral stance. Secondly, this interview has most questions are prepared and not change, so it lacks flexibility. And it is difficult to discuss the issues in depth. Interviewer cannot understand the thoughts of the respondents in detail. Finally, the results of research are easily affected by the personal factors of respondents. In other words, the result will be one-sided, and it cannot reflect most people's views.

Investigators will often use tonal shifts, pauses, and specific word emphasis to get a point across or highlight an area of interest. Asking questions in a certain way also helps to elicit certain emotions on the part of the interviewee, and an emotional subject often produces desired results for the interviewer.Another essential ingredient in effective questioning is preparation. As the investigator and interviewer, you must know what type of information you want to find out, and what corresponding questions you’ll ask to find that information. You should strive to know your subject better than they know themselves. Preparation breeds confidence, and confidence will do wonders for an interviewer when questions need to be asked and information needs

Interviews are conditional to retrospective data and the recall of participants. The data are usually concerned with making the time easily manageable, and typically short. Most unlikely, when the interview takes place, the time is much delayed, hence the participants forget important details. Not to mention possible retrospective biases, interviewees may insert their own reflections and opinions that are irrelevant and inaccurate to the data.