Sandy Hook Shooting

Hundreds of studies have been done to determine whether violent video games will really make juveniles more violent. Randomized experiments were used in several studies to examine the short-term effect of violent video games (Anderson and Berkowitz et al. 90). In these studies, children were randomly assigned to play violent or nonviolent video games and then were observed when given an opportunity to be aggressive. The result was that children who played violent video games usually behaved aggressively.

According to the Source statistic, around 65% of households have a video games device, which means that the majority of households have encountered video games. If video games made gamers violent, then 65% of households would be in violent situation, which contradict with the logic of a human brain. On this conclusion, we can say that theoretically video games cannot be a major factor of making people violent.

This article is a very useful source. Is useful because it answers the question, “Do violent video games cause an increase in aggression.” The question is answered thoroughly by the author because they cited recent studies, examples, and peer reviewed or scholarly sources that all concluded that violent video games cause an increase in aggression. The author is objective because they countered their argument by stating that

The first body of evidence that supports the claim that video games do not cause violence in reality is that “almost all boys and most girls play video and computer games, including games with violent content” (Olsen, Kutner, and Warner 56). This would suggest that if all children play violent video games and video games did in fact cause children to act violently, then all children would be violent. As absurd as this suggestion is, when the claim came

The Sandy Hook shooting in Newtown, Massachusetts was one of the worst school shootings in recent memory and there were changes and precautions in security in the U.S., in schools and out. After the shooting, not just the Newtown School District changed their security, but so did most of the country. Vice President of the NRA Wayne LePierre started a movement so that there could be trained and armed volunteers in 100,000 schools.

The reason for the numerous amounts of reformed gun laws in the past century are due to the

A group of angry and worried moms petition together the following day of the Sandy Elementary Hook shooting. What started as a Facebook page plummeted rapidly turning into a lobbying force on members of congress. Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America wanted more focus on background checks on those who wanted to acquire guns within the United States. An alluring illustration by the campaign is born. The ad that catches the eye depicts a banned children’s book. Two girls are side by side in a library flooded with shelves of books. On the right side stands an American flag, and on the right sits an old rocking chair. The main focus is on the two little girls sitting side by side cross-legged. The girls are total opposites. The girl sitting on the right beside the rocking chair is a short-haired brunette holding an Assault weapon half her size. On the left besides the American flag, an African American girl is holding a children’s book, Little Red Riding Hood. The ad asks the viewers to guess which item is banned in the United States. On the bottom in tiny scripts it writes, “We keep ‘little Red Riding Hood’

In my opinion, photos of Victims of the Sandy Hook Shooting should be released. The public should be allowed to see the photos so they can be informed about the chaotic problems that are occurring in society. With the photos being released to the public eye, people in society can better protect their families and friends. This will decrease the percentage rate of killings/shootings that might occur in the

in 2012 was one of the first school shootings in history with an immense number of

In the aftermath of the Sandy Hook elementary shootings, the NRA executive vice president, Wayne Lapierre, released a statement in a press conference that spoke of how politicians who wanted to make schools a gun free zone only serve to invite all potential killers that schools are the safest place to inflict maximum mayhem with minimum risk. “The only thing to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun” was an important aspect of his speech, which emphasized the need to protect the children in schools with guns. He made the point that the President is surrounded and protected by Secret Service agents who are armed. Lapierre wanted to employ the millions of qualified and active retired police, active, Reserve, and retired military,

On December 14, 2012, almost a month after Obama’s re-election, the Sandy Hook shooting occurred. In this terrible tragedy, twenty children and six adults were murdered at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Connecticut. Two days after the incident, Barack Obama delivered a speech at an interfaith vigil to those who lost their loved ones. In this speech, Obama discussed the need for change and stricter gun laws in order to keep schools safe. He stated, “These tragedies must end….. We can’t accept events like these as routine.”

Screaming, shuffling, and urging… teachers ushered students to safety inside bathrooms and classrooms after Adam Lanza shot the first bullet with his semi-automatic, AR-15 assault rifle. Lanza shot 20 students that day, after killing his mother earlier. Imagine if Lanza’s community had known the signs to look for. That massacre could have been prevented. Moved by the event, a non-profit appropriately named, Sandy Hook Promise, arose to educate the populous on the warning signs of gun violence. To that aim, they created “Evan” a public service announcement (PSA) that shocked the country. First, viewers see the story of a boy and girl’s relationship blossom. Then several days pass in the plot, when suddenly another character starts open fire

Another issue with a lot of studies is the unreliability of some statistics. Studies finding a link between violence and video game playing have been known to be flawed or biased. Findings can also be misinterpreted or bent. This is precisely why the Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association did not really consider the studies. The psychological evidence provided was unpersuasive: “though psychological research is often used in the courtroom in issues relating to child safety, the lack of consistent findings connecting video games to violent behaviour in children helped sway the court against regulation” (Vitelli). The majority opinion stated that studies supporting violence in video games causing aggression have been rejected because they

Video games have become a staple in the entertainment industry. Families coming from various backgrounds across the world own a video game system. Shooting games such as call of duty have become particularly popular amongst young teenagers. These types of games have led to a very popular debate. The question being do violent video games make children violent? Prosecutor Steven F. Gruel believes that they do cause children to become violent while defense attorney Patricia A. Millett argues that there is not enough evidence to prove this to be true.

Findings supporting these claims also show that with an increase in violence comes other negative health risks such as an increased likelihood of substance abuse, sexual activity, and obesity(Denniston, Swahn, Feldman, and Romero). Media use, and subsequent exposure to violent content is extremely prevalent among 8 to 18 year old children who spend, on average, 7.4 hours a day using media or computers and 80% of teens have some type of gaming console(Denniston, Swahn, Feldman, and Romero) These claims and the amount of media children are exposed to were concerning enough that the American Academy of Pediatrics started making advisory statements about violent video games and media being health risks for children in 2001. (Hall, Day, and Hall) Since then the link between violent games and violent behavior in youths has been researched across many “population groups”(Denniston, Swahn, Feldman, and Romero). The second theory revolves around any positive effects that might be gained from playing these games (Hall, Day, and Hall). Stating that these may offer “safe” outlets for negative emotions and thusly allowing players to be more emotionally balanced. (Hall, Day, and Hall)