Sarah Malmstrom's Rhetorical Analysis

She states many of her opinions on how the press should stop telling and spreading false events and ideas in the newspaper. When given the chance she tells her audience journalist about how the American press about her feels and how she feels challenged by them. Overall, the beginning of her speech tells the audience how she is going to state information and how they should listen to

Once again his overall posture and confident level was excellent. The speaker shows passion for the subject he is speaking on from the hand movements when he speaks on poverty and domestic abuse as being trivial (a means to an end). The speakers volume was just right he spoke high enough for the back of the room could here, and the speech was easy to understand. When given a speech a speaker should consider his audience in the wording of his speech, is he giving a speech to children for educational purposes or a group of college students, this is call no one left behind so the entire audience is on track.

She goes through each argument against buying local with thorough arguments and even concedes sometimes to her opponent in a way that does not take away from her argument. When discussing the fact that buying local sometimes hurts workers in third-world countries she acknowledges that but does not let it bring her argument to a screeching halt. Instead she admits that it could have negative effect but the positive effects should not be ignored. It seemed like she managed to avoid any errors while talking about her topic. Her tone could be at times a bit biased which became noticeable when she would talk about her past and how that connected with the idea of buying local. Besides that she made it reader friendly by explaining things simply with words that were accessible. The point where the effects of global warmings were discussed was written in an easily accessible manner. What I liked best was that she tore apart people’s arguments thread by thread which made it easier to support her side of the issue. While she did discuss certain parts about buying local that bothered people she could have been talked about more critiques toward buying local. All in all she made many valid points about buying local in a good

Ruby organized her speech in a very interesting and unique manner. I found a combination of a topical organizational pattern and a problem solution pattern. The introduction of her speech was very strong. She captivated the audience with a personal story that she made even more interesting with many details. She went on

The way she talked about her story attracts the listeners. I really liked it on the part when she slept with Rachel several times and got her pregnant. The beginning of her story was a bit sad because she was unsure about what’s happening to her and what could she do. She came up with her coping mechanism like soccer, work and other stuff that she can do. The first part of her story, where

There is not anything that she needs to improve on other than maybe moving a little more and not to sway. This speaker was awesome she was organized and kept the audience engaged in her story. I watched the entire video and did not wish it was over. I learned that when I am in the dark and do not know where life is going to take me next that I should have hope in the future and forever.

The main thing I wished he would have done differently is not read off of an 8 ½ by 11 sheets of paper. If he would have practiced his speech more he could have just had 3 by 5 note cards and gave most of his speech by memory. Reading off the sheets of paper took away from the personal aspect of the speech. It also made him not look up and give eye contact much at all which did seem to get a bit boring towards the end of the speech. Overall, though, his conversational delivery, vocal variety, and volume were perfect. He had a couple of pauses but was able to regroup and continue where he left off without making a big deal about it. Since he is only in the 7th grade, I applaud him for his overall delivery, some adults will not even go up in front of a board of directors and give a speech, so he is very brave. This shows that he really wanted to get his point across to the

To begin with, she started her first point by mentioning the first question and then answering honestly. When she answered the question, she made a connection with the audience by

The audience(Players) were able to understand her points because she gave us examples that happened in the games. She also incorporated us by asking us to think of examples in the games we played that these 3 points could be worked on. Her speech involved a lot of group discussions, but she also took the stand on many points to explain how these 3 main points need to be worked on for the future games. The conclusion of the speech was very effective because she brought everything back together. She demonstrated how without communication we lack aggression and without aggression we lack confidence. As a team we felt it was very effective to sit down and discuss these points because we identified things we didn’t see as a whole. We felt that as a speaker she took the time to observe what we did not as players and showed us what we were lacking as a team. The speakers use of language was very important to the way she was communicating with us. She did not use a violent or angry tone with us and this helped very much. She would use a voice that grabbed our attention because she would get excited about a great play we made and lower her tone if she felt that there was a situation that could be worked on. An effective use of language is very critical in a speech because it could be the one way they grab their audience attention. Everything that coach Bartlett said was very understandable and encouraging

Sarah has strong potential as a character. In the first act, she doesn’t standout, but she eventually becomes very likable and intriguing. That’s one reason to have her make a speech in the opening to help the audience get to know her better. The idea of her being a peacemaker and then being forced to make a decision about war is another smart story choice. It gives her contradictory worlds: one of peace and one of violence. She’s also caught between being American and being Jewish. Again, that’s why giving her a relative or friend in Israel would also raise the stakes. She’s presented as smart and determined. The visual of her in a blouse and panties acting as President also makes a strong statement. Watching her command in a wheelchair is another smart visual. One can tell she loves her husband. The idea of the Nobel Prize medal is well setup with a solid payoff. She transforms from being a bit uncertain that she can be President, to being a confident

Emily’s speech introduction was started by stating some facts related to her topic that grabbed her audience attention to listen. She explained and preview her main goals/points to her audience which are: 1. critical food items 2. critical objects, and 3. a real world example in emergency preparedness. The speech delivery was clear and delivered with some prepared structure, such as outline or notes. Her delivery was easy to hear and understand. She maintained her good eye contact, volume, rate, strong gestures, and articulation of her speech. She also maintained her energy and enthusiasm in her voice that makes it more interesting to listen in her speech. She cited her sources properly by verbalizing the website where she gets the food

Jean-Phillipe did an excellent job of using delivery techniques to make her speech more effective. The speech was held early in the evening, when most students are probably tired from a long day of class and distracted from thinking about all of the homework they need to start on soon. Her techniques, however, capably boosted our mood and lifted our spirits. She continuously spoke loudly, being careful to use vocal variety and a conversational tone. Although she spoke quite fast, she made sure to pause when necessary to allow us to absorb the information. She used plenty of eye contact and didn’t read from any notes the entire time. One thing that was especially unique about her speech was that she interacted with audience much more than other speakers of similar topics; for example, she would direct a question at the audience and literally run to whoever gave the correct answer, no matter where they were in the audience, and give them a big high-five. In this way, her enthusiasm lifted the mood of everyone in the audience and held our attention for that much

I listen to Patricia Fripp’s speech as well I though she did an awesome job. I could visualize my self in the store with her that day shopping. She really capture my attention the whole speech. I all so tough she did a great job with her posture and hand gesture. I also like the fact that Patricia incorporated humor in her speech, I think that a good way to end tension and nervousness from you and the audience member. I think when a person is giving speeches and can capture there audience attention the whole time then the have the ability to be great at public speaking and patricia speech did that for me so good job.

1) I thought it was interesting to hear her talk about how much religion influences our daily lives even if you are not a religious person. So many rules and laws revolve around ideas that have stemmed from religious beliefs. We sometimes do not realize the extent to which religion influences the way we believe we should behave. It also gets complicated because scriptures can be interpreted so many ways. It can be confusing and can result in conflict. People also use old testimonies and scriptures to justify what they do such as war.

she made was rousing to anyone that was perhaps overhearing or listening to the conversation. It upheld all the characteristics for a good philosophical conversation. They include various aspects of diversity, thought, support and liberalism.