Sas 99

The risk of management fraud needs to be considered when determining tolerable misstatement because the risk of fraud directly affects the risk of misstatement. Smith & Jones has a percentage that tolerable misstatement thresholds should not exceed, which is adjusted tolerable misstatement guidelines, with low risk of management fraud misstatements should balance each other out. However, when high risk of management fraud is likely misstatements will likely skew the company’s numbers to overstate the company’s income (ex. overstating income and understating expenses). If numbers are fraudulently misstated with the goal of increasing income, the chance of highly material misstatements drastically increases.

It is the susceptibility of an account balance or a class of transactions to a material misstatement, assuming that there were no internal controls. The inherent risk at Telstra is that there may be certain types of misstatements that may not be identified during the course of audit. The inherent risk associated with the audit of Telstra is ascertained based on the nature of the business. Telstra Corporation Limited have these kinds of risks:- inventory valuation risk, intangible assets valuation risk, foreign currency risk, interest rate risk, tax risk, amendment risk and compliance risk. All the above stated risks pose potential material misstatements on the financial statements and thus need to be addressed (Telstra

With different industry definitions and viewpoints, fraud can be a tough issue for audit committee members to grasp for oversight purposes. The legal obligations of audit committee members have intensified because their standard duty of care and loyalty to the entity has increased in light of management fraud activities.

Professional auditing standards discuss the three key “conditions” that are typically present when a financial fraud occurs and identify a lengthy list of “fraud risk factors.”

2 Managing fraud risk: The audit committee perspective Fraud in a fi nancial statement audit

) There was a lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals. This resulted in an audit adjustment of $3,578,000. The benchmark for overall materiality is $3,508,000, I would consider the audit adjustment of $3,578,000 a material misstatement. Control environment, principle 2 the board of directors and management exercise oversight of development and performance of internal controls. Due to the severity and material weakness of lack of adequate cutoff procedures to ensure timely recording of period end accruals. Management and the board of directors should evaluate performance of internal control activities including adherence to standards of conduct and expected levels of competence. In

CAS 300 requires auditors to their audit using a risk based model where the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures are based on the assessed risk of material misstatement. Pickett (2006) argues that for audits to be effective and efficient, much of the audit effort should be focused on areas that are considered to pose the highest audit risk. Additional audit procedures should be linked to individual audit assertions whereas other audit procedures need to be performed as and when needed. Thus, for an audit plan to be put in place, it is necessary for an auditor to come up with a risk profile of the client comprising an understanding of the business operating by the audit client, assess business risk and also perform its preliminary analytical review.

f) To evaluate the material misstatement in the accounts, I think both of the consolidated income statement and the three financial statements are useful. We need to use the information properly from all the financial statements. However the consolidated income statement is the most useful one. If there is a significant change in an account balance comparing with preceding two years, the auditor will examine whether there a material misstatement exists. For instance, the bad debt expense as a percent of net sales in 2011, 2010 and 2009 are 0.56%, 0.70% and 0.69%, respectively. There should

al, 2012, p. 214). Therefore, a material misstatement may not be detected during the audit. In addition, the audit may not detect errors under the materiality level, whether resulting from error, fraud, or misappropriation of assets. Anderson, Olds, and Watershed may decline to express an opinion or issue a report if the firm is unable to complete the audit for any reason.

Potential for misstatement & fraud: Compliance with the established procedures and controls were found to be ineffective. The fraud reporting process, technically put in place does not serve its intended purpose. The ineffective control environment has created an attitude and tone across the company where errors and inappropriate behavior may be seen as acceptable, thus creating opportunity for concealing fraud and potential misstatements.

We have the responsibility that if a material weakness and or a significant deficiency are discovered in the performance of the audit, it should be communicated to the audit committee in writing (PCAOB, 2014). The management is also responsible to adjust the financial statements to correct material misstatements found during the audit; if the correction are not done because they are immaterial, it should be stated as part of the representation letter were management is confirming their responsibilities during the audit (PCAOB, 2014).

Assume you are planning the audit and doing a risk assessment. Evaluate all aspects of the Fraud Risk Triangle and identify any fraud risk factors (SAS 122) AU-C 240, Appendix A, p.179 and Appendix 6B of text that your think are present and why? (4 points)

Following the risk assessment procedures, substantive procedures are designed and conducted to detect material misstatements of relevant assertions. Substantive procedures include analytical procedures and tests of details. Analytical procedures involve evaluations of financial statement information by a study of relationships among financial and nonfinancial data. Tests of details may be divided into three types. One test is the test of account balances to address whether there are misstatements in the ending balance of an account. In the case of Crazy Eddie, auditors should have put greater attention to inventory and accounts payable accounts. The second test is a test of classes of transactions to determine whether particular types of transactions have been properly accounted for during the period. Crazy Eddies fraudulently classified these transshipping transactions as retail sales to inflate its sales revenue and continue growth at existing stores. A key ratio for retailers is to compare growth in existing stores to growth from new stores. The third and final test is a test of disclosures to evaluate whether financial statement disclosures are properly presented. Crazy Eddie prepared bogus debit memos of over $20 million to understate accounts payable.

Section 1 2 3 4 Introduction and Assessment Outcomes and Criteria Internal Controls and Fraud Finding weaknesses and making recommendations Report Plan Deadlines Report Guide Business English Other requirements

SAS No. 99 commands auditors to perform unpredictable audit tests. For example, visiting company locations unannounced to count inventory, test accounts that are not typically performed or at low risk, request letter of confirmation from employees about information provided to auditors, interview client personnel in different locations, and using different sampling methods. More auditing tests that can be performed are requesting inventory count at the end of the reporting period and perform substantive analytical procedures using disaggregated data. Testing the management override control is crucial as well. A response to management override would be changing the nature, time and extent of auditing procedures. Executives can commit financial