Sasquatch Dna Study Essay

Performing extensive research, I located and listened to any recording I could locate of a Bigfoot speaking. Mary Green’s book “50 Years with Bigfoot: Tennessee Chronicles of Co-Existence” was also used as a reference. Mary had compiled a dictionary of “Bigfoot” words, along with phrases based on a notebook kept by Janice Carter.

When watching the film Bigfoot created in 1970 directed by Robert Slatzer and starring John Carradine and Joi Lansing I have made connections to the concepts and theories we have discussed in class. To name some of these theorists and concepts such as, Mary Douglas theory of dirt, Aristotle’s conceptualization of reproduction, Freud’s uncanny and the double, and Ann Ratcliff’s difference between terror and horror. Despite the terrible and cheesy 1970’s effects this movie is actually enjoyable to watch and the perfect movie for analyzing the theoretical concepts we have learned throughout the semester.

Smith, Wesley J. “The Grim Good of Animal Research.” Scientific Research, edited by Sylvia Engdahl, Greenhaven Press, 2015. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints In Context, http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/EJ3010948220/OVIC?u=scschools&sid=OVIC&xide9245e81. Accessed 26 Apr. 2018. Originally published in www.firstthing.com, 18 Oct.

"'Okay Arnold,' Dodge said. 'Where did you learn this fact? On the reservation? Yes, we all know there is so much amazing science on the reservation.'"(85)

In Farley Mowat’s, “Observing Wolves”, Never Cry Wolf, 1963 story he writes about his trip to the Keewatin Barren Land in the Northwest Territories. He was sent there by the Canadian government to prove or disprove that the wolves were eating the caribou. Before Mowat went on his journey he would have planned what equipment he needed to bring, how to prove or dis-prove to the Canadian government that the wolves are eating the caribou, and how Mowat would have prevented the wolves from attacking him.

Depending on your school of thought, the phrase “Creation Myths” may be threatening or provocative. Using it was a powerful mechanism for bringing in and holding any reader’s attention. Creationists and Evolutionists (along with everyone in the middle) are likely to be entertained by the essay, but they won’t realize it until they have absorbed multiple points in support of evolution. The mention of hoaxes opened the essay up to a variety of readers: those who are interested in baseball, scientists and nonscientists alike, those who love a good exposé, and even those who despise sports all together. The essay candidly tells the tale of George Hull’s gawky and outlandish creation as a preface to a much larger hoax. Gould is unabashedly critical of the hoax and those who perpetrated it, but his harsh tone slightly subsides when addressing the human “psychic need for an indigenous creation myth” (263 Gould).

Throughout the 150 year history of Bigfoot many concerns have raised, the most in number have been from Native Americans. The Karok Indians tell of an “upslope person”

The Blackfoot People are one of the many Native American Indian tribes that roamed America in the early 1700s. Like many tribes they were nomadic hunters that lived in the Great Plains of Montana and the Canadian provinces of Alberta. The name is said to have come from the colour of the peoples shoes that were made of leather. They had typically dyed or painted the soles of their shoes black.

Bigfoot is a mythical legend that lives in the pacific northwest. Many people believe that Bigfoot is real, and others deny the existence of Bigfoot. People have made a living in trying to find Bigfoot. Animal Planet used to air a show called “Finding Bigfoot.”. There are multiple books about Bigfoot, numerous clubs, and many people dedicated to find the elusive Bigfoot. To become a Bigfoot quester you will need to obtain the knowledge of how the myth of Bigfoot surfaced, what Bigfoot is, and the evidence behind Bigfoot.

Though today, the Blackfoot territory is defined by reserve/reservation boundaries and divided by the United States-Canadian border, their homeland, Nitawahsinnanni (“our land”), continues to be defined by topographical features using their language (The Blackfoot Gallery Committee, 2013, 12). This traditional homeland spans from the North Saskatchewan River (Ponokasisahta, the Elk River) as far south as the Yellowstone River, Montana (Otahkoitahtayi) and from the Rocky Mountains as far East as the “Great Sand Hills

Sasquatch, A.K.A Bigfoot, is an ape, manlike creature that is mostly found to be in wooded areas in the United States. There have been many sightings of Bigfoot, many Bigfoot footprints, and many stories of people who have encountered Bigfoot; therefore Bigfoot exists.

The film demonstrates a tall, furry "Bigfoot" strolling through the timberland. Adherents to Big Foot take note of the animal's cruel method for strolling is a noteworthy point toward the film being genuine. Wild men stories are found among the indigenous people groups of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Grover Krantz composes, "Local stories that can certainly be identified with the yeti happen all through the Pacific Northwest. Their conveyance compares to the range where White Man records are concentrated. According to David Dangling, the legends existed before there was a solitary name for the creature; and that they varied in their points of interest both provincially and between families in the same group; and that comparative stories of wild men are found on each mainland with the exception of Antarctica. Ecologist Robert Pyle contends that most societies have human-like monsters in their people history: "We have this requirement for some overwhelming creature. Each dialect had its own particular name for the animal highlighted in the neighborhood adaptation of such legends. Numerous names implied something along the lines of "wild man" or "bushy man", albeit different names portrayed regular activities it was said to perform, e.g., eating clams. Bigfoot (otherwise called Sasquatch) is the name given to a fanciful simian, gorilla, or primate like animal that is said to possess backwoods, essentially in the Pacific Northwest. In North American old stories, Bigfoot is normally portrayed as an extensive, furry, bipedal humanoid. The term yeti is an Anglicized subsidiary of the Halkomelem word

The results of our research found that over 95% of the DNA on purported bigfoot specimens returned as “Human.” NABS found this as an extremely puzzling result considering the “BIG” names in the Bigfoot world that consider themselves, researchers proclaimed that Bigfoot was a type of ape. Many of these “researchers” claimed that the DNA showing “human” was compromised or contaminated and the results should be disregarded. We saw this same discussion time after time, discount the results, they are wrong. Again, almost every moderately famous researcher known for investigating Bigfoot issues proclaimed the studies and results were flawed,

The debates illustrated how despite scientific evidence, people still continue to believe what they choose to believe. The implications of these trails regarding evolution emphasize the complications between scientific arguments and religious

Like you, I also have heard the stories throughout my entire life. I have to lean towards the first effect of pseudoscience, which is healthy skepticism. I believe that a lot of the people who believer in Sasquatch (Bigfoot) draw conclusion first to support what they think are facts. I don’t’ agree with the possibility in the human-chimp hybrid because, even though their DNA is within 97 percent of humans, the three percent difference is too large of a gap to make it a viable possibility. That being said, I’m like the people from Missouri, ‘you have to show me first.’