Saudi Arabia And The Middle East Case Study

While the U.S. maintained a relatively confusing agenda regarding foreign policies during the Cold War era, its attitudes are clearer in the present as globalization has strengthened connections between all international actors and made it more difficult for some to focus on maintaining hostile outlooks. The U.S. has had a long history with Syria and Israel, as the superpower has struggled to keep the two countries from abusing each-other and has, at times, provided the latter with significant financial and military support. However, U.S. involvement in Israel-Syrian relations has declined significantly in the recent decades, only to emerge in the last few years as a consequence of the fact that the Middle East currently experiences a serious political crisis.

The United States of America’s foreign policy has been related to the Middle East since the end of World War II. The conflict has primarily been to stop the spread of communism not only in the Middle East, but also in the world as a whole. Communism has been the core dispute in American history and is still prominent in today's society. Some would argue that the specific conflicts in history directly relate to the acting president's philosophy. Based on this, historians can determine what shaped America's foreign policy. Some discovered changes in the philosophy when each conflict arose, yet it seems to shift every time a new president comes along. While historians focus on how each event has prompted a specific response from the president;

Many critics have stated that America’s foreign policy does not change despite a change in the country’s leadership. However, the foreign policies adopted by different presidents have differed in various respects. Certain variations can also be seen between the foreign policies of the Obama and Bush Administrations.

Since the United States became the world’s sole superpower, the Middle East has been seen as the most troublesome region in the world by US politicians. This view emanates from all the conflicts going in the Middle East that have the potential to threaten numerous strategic interests for the united Stated such as oil, terrorist, and Israel. Yet Middle East has never seen as problematic as it is now due to the excessive flux of problems the Middle East is struggling with. This increasingly conflicting nature of the region demands the US policymakers to reevaluate American policy in the Middle East to secure US interests. Unfortunately, American policy in the past three decades toward the

As we have seen, domestic policies are made by governmental institution and influenced by a variety of interest groups, political movements, and even the mass media. The president and his chief advisers are the principal architects of U.S. foreign policy, and the congress, the bureaucracy, interest groups also play important roles in the realm. Most American presidents have been domestic politicians who set out to make their place in history through achievements in domestic policy. Bush had traveled very little outside the United States, and had had almost no foreign experience as governor of Texas. Nonetheless, bush was decisive in the initiatives he took to define American's national interest for his administration. Barack Obama had put his

The citizens of the United States of America (U.S.A.) have trusted in the Electoral College for the selection of the President. This selection practice has a success rate that may be arguably effective for the majority of the global situations. Using the electoral process to select one individual to make a decision is not without its controversies. The War in the Gulf region beings one controversial process of a timeline strife with disagreement and afterthought. While the support for the president’s initiatives prior to and during the decisions that affected the Gulf region vary, there may be two key points to ponder. The actual level of support and the perceived levels of support that fluctuates depending upon who and where in the country

There is an extreme male dominance over the women of Saudi Arabia. The men control the women in government, in education, in society, and even in their own homes. A vast majority of women fight for their rights to break free. The Saudi Arabian women’s restrictions need to be changed before the men overpower the women, which can wistfully turn to domestic abuse or even the women become rebellious and break traditions set out for them.

In the last decades the Arabian Gulf countries has undergone tremendous changes at all levels. Write a 10 up to 15 pages assay to highlights the major changes; explain what the drivers behind these changes were, show how these changes occurred and how they impacted societies. Conclude by giving a personal opinion on how these changes were conducted.

To conclude, it is rare both in American and World History to find presidencies and administrations that can go down in history as periods of great innovation on foreign policy. International relations are very complex and volatile and thus difficult to adjust and manage. Therefore, the only way for policymakers and politicians to acquire the necessary intuition in order to deal with the complex nature of international politics, is via the detailed comprehension of their predecessors foreign policy failures and achievement. Thus, the next American government in order to achieve its main goals must learn for Obama’s mistakes while at the same time to continue his successful political

It would be hard for the US to give more assistance to Saudi Arabia as they commit these atrocities without actually dropping the bombs themselves: the Saudis are using cluster munitions (banned by treaty in the vast majority of countries around the world) supplied to them by United States defense contractors. They’re dropping those bombs using American-made fighter jets. The US military, far from being a neutral observer, is actively providing the Saudis with intelligence and logistical assistance for their air strikes. And the US is finalizing a deal to give even more weapons to the Saudis. The Obama administration has already sold them more than $90bn of military weapons over the past five years.

The Atlantic has recently published an article written by Jeffrey Goldberg titled “The Obama Doctrine”. In this article Obama is clear that he has taken a stance of retrenchment when dealing with the constant problems in the Middle East. In the article Obama outlined two tactics that he has been actively using, throughout his presidency, to shift American resources and focus away from the Middle East. In this paper I will address how two policies have successfully pulled America away from the Middle East and how a key assumption by Obama will ultimately save the United States years of worry.

The United States has a complicated history with countries in the MENA region; the United States has great allies in the region, such as Jordan,Saudi Arabia, and Israel, however, there are also other countries that the United States has had mediocre relationships with such as Iraq. Due to the fact that there are multiple countries in the Middle Eastern region each with different relations to the United States, this essay will be focusing on the foreign policy and relations between Iraq and the United States from the start of the Gulf War to the Obama Administration. Although the United States has been in conflict with Iraq for the past few decades, the tables have turned and the U.S. is now aiding Iraq by fighting a common enemy: ISIS.

At issue herein is an overview of the Saudi position and the specific efforts that it is undertaking in a struggle against extremism. An overview of the issue is included along with a description of specific Saudi responses and its communication activities as well as reference to the Prevent

Over the last century, the Middle East has been the location of ethnic rivalry, political and economic instability, religious conflict, territorial dispute and war. Much of this tension in the Middle East comes from the various interpretations of Islam and how the religion should be applied to politics and society. Over the last ten years, the United States and their allies have pushed to promote democracy in the Middle East. However, they too have many obstacles they must overcome. They face problems such as the compatibility of Islamic law and democracy, the issue of women’s rights, and there is always the problem of how to go about implementing a democratic reform in these countries. Many initially would assume that it is only the

Strong economic statistics and prosperous strategic financial positioning in the international market is the corner stone of any country’s international strategic positioning. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the third largest country of Asia after China and India, with population around 22 million owns a strong economic prosperity The growth of Saudi Arabian economy has been accelerated manifolds during second part of twentieth century. This nation building phenomenon is fortified with oil revenues segregated through the modernized institutes of establishment. Demographic studies reveal that with 3% population grown the Saudi folks will be doubled by 2020 and 65% of the total will fall in the ambit of less than twenty-five years. Following these demographics, stake holders are paying special attention in the education sector, healthcare facilities, infrastructure, and industrial and agricultural development. They have ample oil revenue that they are investing in these sectors. However, they have also considered domestic price for telecommunication, electricity and power and petroleum products with the intent of