Saudi Arabia Research Paper

Farkhunda Malikzada, an innocent 27 year old woman was accused of burning Islam’s Holy Book, and with no evidence she was viciously beaten, stoned, run over by a car, and then set on fire. Farkhunda is

Australia and Saudi Arabia are nations with more differences and similarities. Saudi Arabia is found in the Middle East between the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf. The country is divided into thirteen provinces that are ruled by governors who are appointed by the king. The country has an estimated size of 1.96 million square kilometers. In comparison, Australia is surrounded by the ocean, implying the country lacks immediate neighbors.

Firstly, gender discrimination is not an exclusive feature of Saudi Arabia, but it is a more outwardly visible problem there. Gender

Saudi Arabia and Iran are two countries that sit on opposite sides of the Sunni/Shiite divide, which can be argued as being the most prominent issue the Middle East faces today. Saudi Arabia is predominantly known to be a Sunni state, while Iran is largely inhabited by Shia Muslims. Both countries aspire to be the hegemonic powers of the region. Ethnically, Iran is known to be a Persian land, unlike Saudi Arabia that is known to be in the heart of the Arab world. These two countries are separated by the Arabian Gulf and throughout the twentieth century and up until today, the relationship between the two countries has been notoriously contentious. Within the past few years especially relationships between the two states have been very fragile with Saudi Arabia ending diplomatic ties early in 2016. The two states are strained over many issues of which are, interpretations of Islam, oil export policy and hegemonic regional leadership.

Freedom of religion- The First Amendment of the Constitution prevents the government from establishing an official religion of the country. Citizens have the freedom to attend a church, mosque, temple, or other place of worship they choose. They can also choose to not be involved in any religion as well. The first amendment is the reason we can practice any religion we’d like. Freedom is an essential part of the United States; therefore, freedom of religion

According to First Amendment of US constitution, people have freedom in choosing their religion; any organization or laws cannot prohibit this right. Similarly, the section 6 Freedom of worship in Texas Constitution expressed the same concept; all men have the ability to worship the Almighty God, depend on their own concern. However, the First amendment and Section 6 have some differences. The First amendment contains 2 more freedom in human rights; freedom of speech and in the press. It means that no matter what situation people have power in publishing or talking anything they want. While the Freedom of Worship only contains the protection in religion. It stated that no one can control or interfere with one’s religion. Further, Legislature

The first country, allowing women to vote was New Zealand in 1893.The next country was Australia 9 years later and 18 years later the US finally decided to ratify the 19th amendment allowing women to vote. And almost 100 years later, after the US, Saudi Arabia decided to let the women of their country to vote. Many people think that the US took too long to make the decision to let women vote, but what do you think the women of Saudi Arabia thought when the majority of the countries let women vote but they. Saudi Arabia has very strict laws when it comes to the rights of women in fact, they only earned the right to ride a bike in 2013 and earned the right to drive this year.As a woman living in a country where women have an awful lot of rights compared to places like Saudi Arabia I feel that women’s rights in Saudi Arabia are completely unfair.

With similar passion, governments strive to enforce religion. Officials retaliate by deeming rebellious citizens as threats, ostracizing them from communities through imprisonment. Global strategist and religious newswriter, Brian Pellot, addresses his concern with religious freedom, “‘Countries of Particular Concern’

Freedom of Religion: This means that the government cannot force people to accept one set of religious beliefs nor can it interfere with the way they worship in private or public. People can believe what they want with no fear of repercussions from the government.

There are many things that comply to the importance of religious freedom. Many of which we take for granted. If anything, it is our fundamental right to have this freedom, for everyone. There are even a few laws that comply to religious freedom, for example the “1998 International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA)”, this law issues to the United States to criticize mistakes that comply to religious freedom. It also helped advocate the right of religious freedom.

However, in Saudi Arabia killing people in the name of honor will not be considered as illegal and therefore it will not be counted as a crime, an evidence of this is that a women 45 years old originally from Sri Lanka was “being stoned to death after being convicted of adultery in Saudi Arabia - while the man she was caught with faces 100 lashes” (Wheatstone, 2017). Moreover, another evidence which supports this notion is that a Saudi Arabian woman from Riyadh was “woman was murdered by her father for chatting on the social network site Facebook” (Correspondent, 2017). These demonstrates that not all crimes are considered as deviant

According to online jail records and the police, Saudi Prince Majed Abdulaziz Al-Saud was released from prison the following day on a $300,000. The police stated that Saudi Prince Majed Abdulaziz Al-Saud does not have a diplomatic immunity. Saudi Prince Majed Abdulaziz Al-Saud is scheduled to appear in court on October 19, 2015. Not only is he facing a sexual assault charge, but he is also

France has recently been enforcing their ban of full-face veils in public places. The government claims it is for public safety, however, others feel it is the result of “Islamophobia”. Regardless of their reasoning, they are infringing on basic human rights. Most people believe that the ability to worship as they choose is a right given to them, not by any government, but by their deity. However in Venissieux, France a ban on the wearing of full veils in public places was formalized on April 15th, 2011. Thus, making it the first European country to violate what is, to some Muslims, an important religious conviction. Although the police cannot legally remove full veils, they are encouraged to punish those who continue to wear them with fines or required citizenship lessons. The new laws are a direct attack on Islamic culture, allowing the French government to strip its citizens of their history, their identity, and worst of all, of their ability to worship as their scriptures tells them to.

That same year, the court held trial conferences for the human rights activists, including Mohammed Saleh al-Bejadi, co-founder of the Saudi Civil and Political Rights Association and Mubarak Zu'air, a lawyer for long-term prisoners, and a protestor, Khaled al-Johani. On November 22nd, 2011 the court convicted sixteen of the human rights activists with a sentence of 5 to 30 years. Back in 2009, the King made a number of significant changes to the judiciary's personnel at the senior level by bringing in a younger generation. For example, as well as appointing a new Minister of Justice, a new chairman of the Supreme Judicial Council was also appointed. The king also appointed a new head of the Board of Grievances and Abdulrahman Al Kelya as the first chief justice of the new Supreme Court

4. The law does not require proof of the actual state of mind of the accused and disregards the element of intention. Since its enactment in 1986, it has frequently been distorted to intimidate or punish religious minorities and to settle personal scores. Hundreds of innocent people have been imprisoned, forced to flee the country or killed by Islamic extremists under the pretext of punishing blasphemers. In all the cases that we went