Saul Bellow Response essay

In this society that is gradually becoming increasingly dependent on technology, will literature slowly disappear from the minds of the population? This is the question that Ray Bradbury’s novel, Fahrenheit 451, attempts to answer. In this book, he describes a hypothetical world in which the population not only avoids reading, but has made owning books an unthinkable crime, with all books discovered burned, along with the houses of those who hoarded them. In this dystopian future created by Bradbury, the beauty that is literature has been replaced in society by television programs and radio stations. This reveals Bradbury’s obvious fear that modern technology would completely replace books- a legitimate concern to have. In 2015, the value of books differ between groups of people. The disadvantage of this is that books provide the readers opportunity to allow their imaginations to run wild, something that television and radio never could. Fahrenheit 451 addresses the problem and fear of overwhelming technology through its fictional world, which shows what would happen should people render literature completely useless through the use of television and radios.

In the passage “Why Literature Matters” by Dana Gioia, Gioia states that the decline of interest in reading in America is decreasing. She then claims that this lack of interest will hold negative effects on the future of our society. Gioia uses facts and evidence to support her claim.

In Dana Gioia’s article titled “Why Literature Matters”, he explains about the decline of reading literature for young Americans. Although “income rose to unforeseen levels, college attendance ballooned, and access of information increased enormously” he states, “the interest young Americans showed in the arts… diminished”. In his article, Gioia uses surveys, articles, studies, and statistics to persuade his audience that the decline of reading in America can have a negative effect on society.

She claims initially that.” The declines have been most severe among younger adults (ages 18–24).” She sets a very clear age range to add credibility to her stands. Her target audience is clearly stated to be Americans older than the ages 18-24 so that they can agree that the loss of interest in the Arts can be logical especially because the age range are of individuals that are not so mature yet and have different interests. She then proceeds to add,” As more Americans lose this capability, our nation becomes less informed, active, and independent-minded.” Gioia presents her audience the complicated situation that has risen with the loss of reading. She motivates the reader to understand that not one individual but the nation is tragically being affected in several ways. Finally, she adds,” Author Daniel Pink states… When asked what kind of talents they like to see in management positions, business leaders consistently set imagination, creativity, and higher-order thinking at the top.” Dana makes the argument even more intense by presenting her audience how not only the young are in danger of the consequences yet them too. Her audience in engaged even more when they realize that due to poor reading habits they might be in danger of losing their higher paying job opportunities. This is a very effective strategy to do her part because that

Dana Gioia builds an argument to persuade american citizens that the decline in reading in america will have a negative effect on society. The decline of reading in the point of view of dana will decline americans knowledge

In the passage, Dana Gioia uses the logical appeal of facts founded by polls and surveys to show how other people felt about the young adults not reading enough literature. Gioia found that the “most worrisome finding” that took place in a 2002 survey, “is the declining percentage of Americans” reading literature of the ages 18 through 24. The author alludes to the

Birkerts explores this idea thoroughly, projecting almost a sense of fear at the thought of any changes to what was already present. “A change [was] upon us—nothing could be clearer” (Birkerts, 2), and the unpredictability of it seemed frightening as is. But beyond this fear, there was a sense of urgency. An urgent need to halt whatever was yet to come, or at least stall these progressions until the importance of physical text was completely established. Having “ co-managed a used and rare book shop in Ann Arbor, Michigan” (Birkerts, 1), the value of literature held to be astronomically important to him. This, however, seemed to be slowly not applying to more and more of the general population with every advancement we’ve made electronically. Shifts in popular methods of learning held as no surprise to him, especially since this had been the case multiple times throughout history.“ [In] Greece…[around] the time of Socrates, the dominant oral culture was overtaken by the writing technology, [while] in

Things that used to be printed out on paper such as newspapers and articles can all be found digitally. There is not hope for the things of the past like that. It is only a matter of time before there won’t be any paper books. They will all be digital. A much acclaimed critic writes, “One has only to look at

Declines in reading is growing larger and larger as time goes on. The author showed this by using a survey that was taken in 2002. It stated “declines have been most severe among younger adults… ages 18-24”. If the younger adults arent intrested in reading, then they won’t push that love onto their children one day. This then starts a trend of literature rates droping fast.

“Why Literature Matters” by Dana Gioia is a persuasive text on how literary interests have fallen. Gioia starts this claim by giving very promising information. The information has a great accomplishments but, Gioia also tells of how our literary interests as Americans have fallen drastically. A 2002 Survey of Public Participation in the Arts shows that eight of nine major forms of literature show decreased participation by many Americans. The “2002 Survey of Public Participation in the Arts” gives staggering results according to Gioia about many young Americans neglecting enjoying reading literature.

In this persuasive essay “Why Literature Matter”, Dana is trying to explain how our society is losing it’s best qualities by Americans not reading literature. Dana is persuading her audience by using facts from former research done. It is thought to be that who doesn't grow up around literature have less of an imagination and tend to work in factories. About 38% of employees working for the National Association of Manufacturers in 2011 were ranked second to argue how schools are teaching reading comprehension wrong. Society today is losing the uniqueness and individuality we used to have because of the nonreader people.

“That individuals at a time of crucial intellectual and emotional development bypass the joys and challenges of literature is a troubling trend.” This is a quote by Dana Gioia from his article “Why Literature Matters”. Although income, college attendance and access to information all increased dramatically, young Americans showed diminished interest in literature and arts. Dana established his claim that if this condition continues to worsen, it will eventually cause negative effects in the long run. He builds his argument effectively by using plenty of statistics, the rhetorical device of irony, and call to action.

Since technology is being to do a books job and people in our world are naturally lazy it is no question that it's likely for book to just become a thing of the

So many avid readers feel the same as I do and that is why print will never die. Golden Age, yes indeed. “Why Book Publishing Can Survive Digital Age.” No matter what school or career a writer or a future writer pursues, print and ebooks both will be a part of their lives. Just because everything is online does’t mean everyone reads it that way. The Digital Age is just like the Golden Age, a time for what we love lives on. Whether it be traditional publishing, which is how I would love being since that is what I knew as I became an avid reader as a child. The same goes for digital, I like that text, but it’s so detached and cold. I will read what I need to for school and work. I know that starting out that I will probably have to write ebooks. I prefer traditional, but then again I was an online reporter for three years. With that being said, I paid my dues, so my degree and dreamlike career should be next… right?! I see myself copyediting, publishing, writing. I just want to be a writer and write what no one asks about. My internal clock ticks and tock for suspense and imagination. I see myself working at a film institute while writing a script for my first feature

The newspaper industry is undergoing a radical change in three primary areas caused by technology. First, the underlying two-sided business model is changing. With the Advent of internet, news content is easily and freely available from various sources but lacks quality journalism and credibility. Revenues from online advertising are not large enough to compensate for decline in revenues from print advertising & subscription. Newspaper industry is experiencing new realm of new content delivery and in process of understanding and establishing sustainable sources and