Savagery During The Middle Ages

The moral code of knights was called chivalry. Chivalry is said to be traced back to Charlemagne, the first emperor of Europe. Chivalry stresses knightly piety, courtly manners, generosity, caring for those lesser than you, respecting your superiors, and far more. The Samurai's moral code was called Bushido. Bushido is often referred to as Japanese chivalry.

In the time period between 1066 and 1485, better known as the medieval age, a set of standards and how people are placed into order of importance in society is known as feudalism. In this caste system there are four groups; Kings, Barons, Vassals, and Serfs. The main individual of focus comes from the vassals, better known as the knight. Knights from this time period start out around 7 years old and are taught a code of chivalry (code of conduct) and the basics of knight hood. The knight in the Wife of Bath’s tale forcibly violates a young madden and punished with execution by decapitation. He is saved by the queen but is sent on a twelve month and a day quest. The knight in the Wife of Bath’s Tale doesn’t display chivalry by his actions

The code for knights was called Chivalry. “In the ceremony for becoming a knight, you would solemnly promise to do no good deed, be loyal to the King, to give mercy for those who ask it, always be courteous and be helpful to ladies, fight in no wrongful quarrel for worldly gain, upon pain of death or forfeiture of knighthood and in King Arthur’s favour” (Doc.E.). There was also a code for samurai called Bushido. The code contained rules like “discharging loyal service to his master, deepening his fidelity(loyalty) in associations with friends, and devoting himself to duty above all.” People who transgress against these moral principles shall be punished. They did not have mercy like the knights did. These are the similarities and many differences of the codes for knights and

During the Middle Ages, concepts like courtly love and chivalry were being recognized as a moral code for knights to live their lives by. Sir Gawain and

Literature of the Middle Ages can not be discussed without acknowledging the undeniable importance of chivalry. Chivalry in relation to the middle ages is defined as “the code of conduct adhered to by Medieval knights with gallant knightly values including honor, bravery, courteousness and honesty.” This key characteristic is essential in defining an ideal knight as well as his expectations. A knight must live by a chivalric code in which he becomes indebted to the people, his fellow knights, and most importantly, his lord. No other knight displayed more of a devotion to upholding the code then Lanval of Marie de France’s lai “Lanval.” Lanval demonstrates his chivalric nature in essential every action from maintaining comitatus amongst the

At this point in history the men who fought the wars were lead by their leaders with a code of chivalry. Chivalry can be explained as “the Anglo-Saxon code on steroids.” (McGee) Which is, explained further, a moral system for a good way to conduct fighting. The knights in Arthurian time went even further with that code to say that it was a way to conduct oneself not only in battle, but at all times. Knights, by being chivalrous, were kind to all people, fought well and true, kept faith and believed in the Christian God, and fought for their kings. Chivalry can be found across the Arthurian texts, The Song of Roland is one of the texts that has multiple examples of chivalry.

It is fascinating that the worlds of the past and present are not as different as one may fathom. Societies in the past had a code that noblemen must follow in order to maintain their status as a hero. In modern day society, we too follow the same general code that makes up heroes. If the knights of the modern day did not follow the code of chivalry to some degree, society would no longer have heroes at all. First of all, it is true that the two codes have some minor differences, but none that set them fully apart.

     An act of chivalry is described as the qualifications or character of the ideal knight. Knights were expected to uphold this code of conduct. In the English literature Le Morte d?Arthur, French for ?The Death of Arthur?, by Sir Thomas Malory, the characters display acts of chivalry from beginning to end. Though the code of chivalry contains many qualities or acts, nevertheless bravery, loyalty, and courtly love are demonstrated more throughout this literature.

Chivalry was considered to be the code of behavior expected of a knight. It was the conduct, ideas, and ideals of the knightly class of the Middle Ages. It became standardized and referred to as chivalry, a term derived from the French word chevalier, meaning knight. The code urged the knight to be brave, courageous, honorable, true to his word, and loyal to his feudal overlord, and to defend his Church. A knight was truthful, honest, capable, educated, physically fit, noble, sincere, and subservient to the king. A serious violation of these vows could result in a knight being classed as an undignified knight, which was the ultimate insult because of all the hard work that was put into becoming a knight. It made it seem as if all of work

One thing knights and samurai’s had in common were moral codes. The samurai had a code of honorable behavior called the Code of Bushido. Likewise, the European knights had a code called the Code of Chivalry. Both knights and the samurai were disgraced in dishonoring their practice. This is an excerpt taken from the Code of Bushido, “The samurai confines himself to practicing the way; should there be someone who transgresses against these moral principles, the samurai summarily punishes him and thus upholds proper

The Medieval period was a time of noblemen who fought for love, honor, and country under a code of chivalry. "Chivalry comes from the French word cheval, chivalry means someone who fights from horseback. The term also meant "knighthood".(Matthews, Platt, Thomas p.234-235)." In this period the nobility used war as a way to show their power and hold their status by being professional soldiers. There were also lots of soldiers from the lower classes who were led into battle under nobles. These soldiers fought for the nobleman to maintain their safety and land. The soldiers rode into battle on their horses in full armor with weapons drawn ready to defeat their enemies one by one. They laid siege castles for weeks and months at a time until the

Even though some people may think that the Middle Ages weren't horrific because they like war but, if they were there they would know it wasn't a cake walk. This topic is based on dark times in society that were unnerving to many citizens of Europe. Attacks were very popular and happen most of the time during the Middle Ages. Also, there was much death during the Middle Ages.

They would only fight at the king’s wish and only use as much power as necessary. This meant knights were expected not to quarrel in any unruly fashion or continue fighting against an opponent once a battle had ended. Jousting was a clean method used among knights to determine superiority and bravery rather than fatal one-on-one duels. Geoffroi De Charny's 'Book of Chivalry’ notes that knight were supposed to “[...]speak of the achievements of others but not of your own, and do not be envious of others” ( par. 1). Chivalrous knights were assumed to be kind, cordial, and vigilant without having excess

Knights are one of the most mistaken figures of the medieval era due to fairytales and over exaggerated fiction novels. When medieval knights roamed the earth, it was known that they were only human and, like humans, had faults. These knights did not always live up to the standards designated by society. However, in The Canterbury Tales, the knight is revealed as a character that would now be considered a knight in shining armor, a perfect role model in how he acts and what he does. Modern day people see them as chivalrous figures instead of their actual role as mounted cavalry soldiers. As time passes, the idea of what a knight is changes from a simple cavalry soldier to a specific type of behavior.

When people associate things with the word “dark” there mainly referring to things that are evil, bad or have an evil look. So when you put the label “Dark ages” on the Middle ages, you make the assumption that it was not a good time. But you’d be mistaken, it was completely the opposite. Though not much revolution took place in the early Middle Ages, the people were happy and content, and "the Dark Ages" just doesn’t fit with that, it’s not a accurate label to put on the Middle Ages.