preview

Savagery In Brave New World

Decent Essays
Open Document

In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, one of the characters is John. His savage upbringing means that he views civilisation from an uncivilised standpoint. However despite his savagery, his views are close to our own. World State removes unhappiness and tragedy from society, however in so doing it sacrifices true individuality. People are happy, but not truly happy. John debates with one of the World Controllers, who claims that, “actual happiness always looks pretty squalid in comparison with the over-compensations for misery”. John “claims the right to be unhappy” - he would rather have the negative aspects of life: “the right to grow old and ugly and impotent; ... the right to have too little to eat, the right to be lousy; the right to live …show more content…

His mother, Vashti, and the rest of society are content with their lives underground and within ‘The Machine’ (although a sparse number still do live on the surface). All communication between people is almost exclusively virtual, and ‘original’ ideas are met with disapproval. However Kuno, displeased with people’s isolation (as everyone lives in separated cells, and never interact with anyone outside of the Machine) and their dependence on technology, says to Vashti: “It has robbed us of the sense of space and of the sense of touch, it has blurred every human relation and narrowed down love to a carnal act; it has paralysed our bodies and our wills…” Like John, he is in a society conditioned to be content with their lives. People’s needs are all sated by The Machine. But there is no originality and creativity. Intimacy and personal contact are practically non-existent. Kuno attempts to try and get Vashti to revitalise these aspects and break off from the Machine. As the Machine breaks down and collapses, Kuno and Vashti finally experience what the Machine has prevented them from doing, hug. Before they perish with the many others within the Machine, Kuno says to her, " I am dying - but we touch, we talk, not through the Machine." His plight is used as a reminder that even though technology is allowing us to interact more easily - it is in fact causing us to be more distant and less intimate. And with the constant advances in technology …show more content…

Nuclear war has ravaged the world, and civilisation has been pushed back thousands of years into the past. Technology and language is archaic, and most of history has been lost. The Eusa Story presents what pieces humanity is able to make out of the past, about the discovery of the atomic bomb - the “1 Big 1”. It tells the story of Eusa, whose greed for ‘clevverness’ leads him to pull apart the Littl Shyning Man (splitting the atom), inevitably resulting in the apocalyptic world they live in. A puppet show run by ‘Pry Mincer’ Goodparley travels around England, telling the story of Eusa. However, in spite of the warnings against this pursuit of ‘clevverness’, an effort by Goodparley and company to recover this lost knowledge is underway. The puppet show is altered to justify their pursuit, by showing that Eusa seeking clevverness was not in fact the cause of the apocalypse. Riddley Walker, a young boy who inherited his father’s job of ‘connexion man’ (the person who interprets the show), ends up on a journey which leads him to discover Goodparley’s plans. His journey leads him to realize the lesson from the 1 Big 1 - that “Bad Time[s]” are derived from knowledge. As Goodparley pursues the knowledge of the bomb, it is only going to cause further

Get Access