Essay on Scalawags

There were some people who didn't agree with everything that the Federalist Party believed. This new party was known as the Democratic Republicans. This party was made up of farmers, small businessmen, and laborers. The Democratic Republicans weren't backed by as much money, and were considerably poorer than the Federalists. The south and west parts of the United States were most influenced by the Democratic Republicans because that is were the majority of the farming population was

The South on the other hand, supported Thomas Jefferson and his democratic-republican views. Thomas Jefferson's popularity rose with many old federalists who were artisans and urban workers. Thomas Jefferson planned to change the country by having independent Yeoman farmers.

     The Republicans and Democrats didn’t really have strong opposing beliefs during this period. The Republicans supported high tariffs and sound money. The Democrats supported lower tariffs and expanded currency. Both rural and urban classes supported each party. They worked with spoils and local issues. Both

Although the two parties seemed to be polar opposites, there were a few similarities between them. The whigs may have been in favor of a larger central government, they did not support many types of government intervention. As businessmen most whigs were willing to use cheap child labor to make larger profits. For this, the southern democrats often criticized the

During the Antebellum period, the two major parties were the Democrats and the Whigs. The Democrats advocated for slavery and were led by Herschel V. Johnson, Joseph E. Brown, and congressman Howell Cobb. The upperclassmen were usually part of the Whig party. They wanted the Federal Government to help the South. Robert Toombs and Alexander H. Stephens were the leaders of the Whigs. In the 1840’s most governors were democrats and most of the legislature were Whigs. In the 1850s, Georgians did not like the Compromise of 1850 but the leaders of each party asked the Georgians to accept it. Even though the Georgians didn’t approve of the Compromise they knew it was necessary.

Black and white abolitionists shared common assumptions about the evil of slavery, the "virtue of moral reform", and the certainty of human progress"(1). Schor, Garnet,1877, & Lanngston, 1989). This shared understanding provided "the basic for the interracial solidarity" and cooperation so vital in the crusade against slavery"(2). (Schor and Garnet, 1877). But blacks also brought a distinct perspective to the antislavery movement. Their abolitionism was shaped profoundly by their personal experience and racial oppression. Unlike most white abolitionists, they

As we’ve learned, most southerners defended slavery, even though they were not part of the “Plantation Aristocracy.” What is imperative to comprehend and process is why they supported slavery. It is also important to discuss the claims made by its supporters and why it was easier to end the slave trade as opposed to ending slavery in general. It is really quite incredible to process the following information because I could personally not relate or even understand how one human can think of another in such a demeaning way. As many can agree, when a society evolves around any establishment, as the South did around slavery, it will convey into a set of arguments to support it and that is exactly what they did.

The Republicans in Congress had passed many Acts and tariffs, like the Morrill Tariff, the Pacific Railroad Act and the Homestead Act. These acts gave them an advantage in political. Republicans were scared that the southerners may join the democrats in the north and win the control of the Congress.

They believed in three things, first, they were mad at the South because they had caused the war. Second, they wanted to punish them. Third, they wanted to help the slaves who are now considered as freemen after the war ended. the Radical Republicans didn’t like Andrew Johnson’s plans, which are almost mirrored his previous president Abraham Lincoln, they felt that he did not pay attention to the major issue, which was the rights and protection for slaves, and because of that Andrew was considered weak and was impeached in 1868. Even though he was considered a southerner and should sympathize with the South except he was considered a racist for ignoring the blacks and consecrating only about the white men.

The Whigs social and moral reform beliefs intrigued evangelical Protestants and free black voters. Unfortunately for the Whigs, their link to the evangelicals eliminated the other faiths from joining their Whig party. The Whig’s platform of slower settlement of land brought them more constituents such as black New Englanders and slave owners from the Upper South. With the variance of people also came a variety of opinions on topics such as slavery but in 1840 the Whigs came together and in an election for General William Henry Harrison. Harrison became the leader of the Whigs party and ended up winning the election.

While in the South, majority of the Whigs were engaged with Democratic

A good majority of it’s patrons were from the coastal and urban areas, whilst Jacksonian Democrats voters mainly came from rural and agrarian societies; generally, more economically developed areas would vote Whig.

Mostly southerners, including Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, made up the Democratic Republicans. They wanted the country to remain a more rural country, instead of cities. Democratic Republicans were very wary of the national government. They fought for the states' rights and believed that there should be a strict interpretation of the Constitution. The Democratic Republicans feared that by

Slaveholders viewed themselves as a superior class of people. “A yeomen farmer from Bell Buckle, Tennessee, Keysaer complained that before the Civil War the slaveholders always acted as if they were of a better class and there was always an unpleasant feeling between slaveholders and those working themselves” (80). Nonslaveholders were known as yeomen and actually did their own work. On the other hand, slaveholders had the slaves work for them. They were lazy and never participated in the work on their plantations. There was often confusion associated with a slaveholder and nonslaveholder. Many questions were asked concerning how their views were alike or different about slavery. Not owning a slave, was not an indication of the preference of a yeomen farmer. Yeomen often wanted to take care of their own responsibilities rather than depending on the help of a slave. However, according to slaveholders, slave ownership was viewed as the preference of the superior class of people. “Indeed, owning slaves apparently made a difference in the perception of class relations in the Old South” (80). “Thus the more prosperous of Keysaer’s fellow Tennessee veterans interviewed many years remembered that relations between slaveholders and nonslaveholders were grounded in “social equality” (80).

His making national notoriety drove some immediate Democrats to think of him as Presidential timber. In the first place they influenced him to keep running for Governor of New Jersey in 1910. In the crusade he communicated his adaptability of the traditionalists and of the machine that had doled out him, supporting a dynamic stage, which he searched for after as congressperson.