School Board Issue Analysis : Providing A Free Education

Schools lacking social utilities that are needed to promote the academic status of its students is an issue. Whether these utilities should be kept opened or closed is widely debated in most communities. The condition of such schools is an important issue because it determines the future of its students academically. Some issues facing schools include social, public and economical issues; this essay will consider arguments concerning the social, public and economical causes of this problem through the use of Jonathan Kozol's "TITLE OF ARTICLE", as well as the discussion of the reasons why some schools do not receive sufficient funds to care for public schools.

Since last spring, Philadelphia school district leaders have been sounding the alarm about this year’s fiscal budget. Even after months of discussions and headlines, schools have opened with fewer resources than last year. On March 28th the School Reform Commission approved a lump sum budget which showed a need for an additional $220 million in revenue in order to provide schools with same resources as the “wholly insufficient” 2013-14 school year (McCorry). There will be many inadequate funding impacts on the quality of the education. Classroom resources would be stripped to untenable levels. The district would reduce as much as $2.2 million funding to the districts’ multiple pathways to graduation program which affects estimated 300 students. Another $1.5 million could be reduced from the elimination of preparation and professional development time for teachers at the district’s high needs promise academies. The district’s building maintenance budget could have reduction in amount of $9.6 million. Schools will be cleaned less frequently as a result. Building maintenance will also be curtailed as a result. District’s school police budget could also have reduction in amount of $2.4 million. School police officer vacancies will be unfilled, leaving an additional 27 elementary schools to share an officer.

Public school funding is unfair and unequal in most states. However, more concerning is out of the 49 million children in public schools, students living in poverty are affected the most. There are wide disparities in the amount spent on public education across the country, from a high of $18,507 per pupil in New York, to a low of $6,369 in Idaho (Baker, Sciarra, & Farrie, 2015). The question that all stakeholders should be asking is school funding fair?

According to the budget, the programs that are needed and make a difference (students with disabilities, homeless and immigrants) are where the funding is applied. The funding sources for the Bibb county District Schools applied are as follows Title I & II, At Risk, local school and others are looked at yearly for implementation of the following year. The ways the funds are distributed are upsetting. The students rank at 41 out of the 51 states in education which is near the bottom for academic performance. Bibb County District is considered a poor county as it ranks 40th in the nation in child welfare. It is mentioned that education and the ability to earn a stable income will always be connected together, (Purser, 2015). The allocated funds should be distributed to helping the students who need the extra tutoring or help in specific areas in all schools. The statistics of academic performance proves that either the students’ needs are not being met by the teachers being paid for their services or the funding of other programs are not being applied to the appropriate programs for these student to excel in their performance, (Miles,

In Underfunding for Public School by Marcial Macias, he specifically addresses how are schools going to provide the proper education to students if schools don’t have the proper funding? This question prompts a wide variety of answers and opinions due to the fact that everyone has their own opinion on this query. This question seems to interest the majority of people in the American society. Therefore, I can see many people such as parents reading Macias’s essay.

The school years are the grounding years of one's learning. Schools have a major role in transforming children to become reliable citizens and contributing members of society. Education paves the way for someone to have a great career. Education builds character and gives someone the skills to succeed in life. The national average of the yearly per-student spending in Public K-12 Schools is about $12,000. Students who attend schools in states with higher per pupil spending outperform students in states with a low per-pupil spending. The students score higher on the National Assessment of Academic Progress (NAEP) tests. They are also better prepared for college and are able to handle the transition to the college workload.

The 2010 Condition of Education report showed that more than 16,000 U.S. public schools struggle with concentrated poverty. Additionally, U.S. schools saw a 5% increase in students eligible for free or reduced-price

Pennsylvania’s schools have grieved from “$1 billion” in finance cuts and a deficiency of funds. Pennsylvania have seen fewer educators, greater class sizes, and smaller funds that make it more challenging for students to acquire a resilient learning in Pennsylvania’s public schools. To get back on track and be competitive we must find ways to fund schools, and we must arrange for good education for our young generations.

George Eastman once said, “The progress of the world depends almost entirely upon education.” By its public school system, the United States of America exemplifies this. Federally denied to none and paid by all, United States citizens have the opportunity to attend public school, should they choose. Over the past fifty years, America’s education system has undergone multiple changes. It began with President Lyndon B. Johnson signing into action the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) as an extension of his “War on Poverty” plan. ESEA funded primary and secondary education, encouraged equal access to schooling, established lofty standards and accountability - all done with the intention of closing the achievement gap

Education in the United States already excludes people based on socioeconomic status: the poor are often unable to afford luxuries like college educations, private schools, and tutors. The public education system, however, was supposed to enable lower income students to gain an education comparable to private education. However, there is no comparison between private education and public education, especially when public education is not equitably funded. Beyond differences in education funding from state to state, individual school districts have funding disparity from school to

Since 1983 public education has been an issue in America. The system has been constantly changing every year with reforms. This constant change has been driven by the American people’s perception that education has declined and something should be done about it. First there was an increased emphasis on basic skills, making school years longer and more graduation requirements. Second, many began focusing on increasing teachers professionalism. Third, they began restructuring many things such as how the schools were organized and how the school day was structured etc. Now today the most of the American people believe that not enough money is given to public schooling. They associate academic improvement with the money the school is funded.

American’s public school system have struggled to assist the proper funding acquiesces for providing amenities that are required by the administration, faculty, staff and students. The success rate of the school systems budget has overturned the phrase President Lyndon Johnson initiated regarding standardize poverty levels. “Poverty must not be a bar to learning, and learning must offer an escape from poverty,” President Lyndon Johnson. Dilapidated buildings, equipment, and materials are the results of the mishandling of misappropriated funding. Equitable funding and the better lack of funding gaps have led to court challenges that ironically why American’s public school is not able to meet or exceed higher standards as justified.

Budget cuts in schools cause turmoil and stress among the students and faculty. Drastic changes in the budgets have caused schools to negatively impact the people around them. With the lack of funding, schools are facing difficult decisions on what to do to stay within their budget. Supervision is facing much scrutiny on how to handle the lack of funding in their school districts. A solution needs to be made to improve the distribution of funding to our schools in order to keep them operating and thriving for our children to obtain their education. Budget cuts in schools have shown negative effects on employee positions, supplies, extracurricular activities.

I presume learner specific disabilities and capacity ahead of performing in the classroom through distinctive peers consequently, considering Least Restrictive Environment and Free Appropriate Public Education. Therefore, the student conveniently develops an empowering environment prior to comprehending literacy.

The United States prides itself on its public education system making it a core value of many families. The level of education a person has will influence their career achievements. Americans expect their public system of education to provide a solid curriculum. Most of the people in the United States place their trust in the public school system in which they support through taxes. This trust although is contradicted by the public system of education’s current shape. Much of the schools in the United States are either deteriorating, or failing all together. The drawbacks of public education create an unhealthy environment for student learning.