School Lunch Research Paper

First of all this change would exponentially vary our diet with other hearty choices, which is said to, “give children the energy they need to stay focused, pay attention in class, and learn the information presented to them” (Wittman 2). Compared to the drab, unfulfilling food our cafeteria provides we would be able to use our forty minute lunch period to actually consume a healthful lunch instead of a packaged, processed parcel of our many reheated or a hurriedly prepared lunches from home or school. Besides the benefits to the well being of the students it would also provide the staff a break period. This break would be caused by the decrease in the amount of students who would be at school during lunch. I am able to theorize that many of my fellow students would rather select something from a restaurant in Templeton rather than the school cafeteria. Although this very beneficial augmentation of our lunch privileges would extremely preferred by my fellow students

During an average school day, most schools will provide a lunch for their students. After concern that school lunches were helping contribute to the obesity epidemic, the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act (HHFKA) began to regulate school lunches. “The Obama administration’s new Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, signed into law last December, sets aside $4.5 billion over 10 years to fund school lunches and child nutrition programs; it requires school lunch programs to double the amount of fresh fruits and vegetables in each meal, reduce calories and expand access to drinking water during meal time. With 31 million children receiving school lunches and 20% of all U.S. children suffering from obesity, the measure should help to improve the food

School lunches should be in better condition before fed to students. As we know, schools don’t have the best lunches. There have been expired food, “fresh meat”, etc. This is very unhealthy towards kids health. If anything happens to them, the school would be responsible (McClatchy Tribune News Service) . Even though, school lunches are “told” to be healthy they should increase the foods’ healthiness/ freshness.

Logic suggests school lunches should be changed. While they may taste good, many choices in school cafeterias are unhealthy, or high in calories. In fact, many school districts don’t follow codes for school lunches made by the government, making them high in fat, carbohydrates and sugar content. As a result, American children who eat unhealthy meals at school will make the same unhealthy choices later in life as adults. In 2012, the U.S. Government updated the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs or NSLP (Angela). This set of standards stated that going forward, school lunch programs had to count fruits and vegetables as separate meal groups, offer fruit every day, make half of grain choices whole grains, offer different meal

Calories, obesity, epidemic―these words flash through daily conversion like wildfire. The American public today is severely concerned with the nation’s growing health problem, as they should be. Recently, the nation’s school lunches have had major renovations due to the alarming increase in childhood obesity. The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) has set out to fix the problems concerning nutrition in school lunches. Because the National School Lunch Program is required to follow the most current version of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA), school lunches are undergoing massive reform at the cost of students.

First of all, lunches need to have better food for less. Right now I spend about $3 on a normal lunch which is really small and extremely expensive. Usually I will buy more food to suffice my hunger and I will spend up to $5 more. That is around $8 a day on food! That is outrageous! Schools need to make food that will actually fill the students up and and make it taste better because it school lunches taste like an old

Did you know that school lunches have a great way for kids to eat healthy and get the nutrition, protein and vitamins that kids need to be healthy and proactive and use the energy that kids have built up inside their bodies to accomplish their goals that they have set for themselves?School lunches are a great way for kids to eat their vegetables and enjoy foods that are healthy but delicious at the same time.this is important because students/kids should make sure that their body have enough fat and protein to keep them both insulated and healthy.

The lunch bell sounds and students run to get an nutritious meal but, it's really not nutritious.

With obesity, especially among children, increasing in America, the topic of healthier school lunches is a big controversy. Schools all across the country are being forced to choose between healthy lunches and the students’ favorite lunches. Changing school menus is a bad idea. For some students, this could be the only meal he or she receives each day. This may also cause students to bring unhealthier food or skip lunch all together and substitute it with fast food.

Chlidren born in the year 2000, will be the first generation in the American history to die younger than their parents, and the major cause is the food we have feed them. We are one of the most unhealthy country in the word; where disease linked to diet is the first cause of death, but the good news is that obesity is a controllable risk factor. So we can easly save the next generations if we just begin to find weher are the weakness and the mistakes that lead us to this awful reality. One of the fundamental piece of this issue is our school lunch program. Schools, which are supposed to give our kids the good example are serving kids cheap and unhealthy food. Clearly, American school lunch program

Recently, parents began to swap out sugary cereals for ones that claimed to “contain less sugar” and filled their pantries with snacks that had “less artificial additives” (Kellogg Company). What parents may not know is that some of these substitute foods, like Welch’s reduced sugar fruit snacks, and fat-free turkey, are not nutritious and actually contain more sodium than the daily requirement, are highly processed, loaded with even more sugars, fats, and chemicals like diacetyl than the original product. (Jacques). It is no secret that processed foods are harmful and unhealthy for us, nevertheless, processed products dominate natural food in America’s kitchens and cafeterias. Our country needs to see strict regulations for school lunches that are FDA

Essentially,mainly everyone wants or seeks to be healthy. What is concerned to be healthy? Being healthy is being physically and mentally in well-being and not possessing any health dieases.In order to achieve healthiness one doesn’t have to change their lifestyles dramatically,one can start out with baby steps and then way their way up. Even the most miniature changes make a significant difference in the human body.

There many reasons why we should care about school lunches in a community and in our nation

The monies received by school districts from the government to fund the National School Lunch Program are not sufficient enough to provide the fresh and whole foods that our children need. There has recently been a revolution in the National School Lunch Program, set in place by Michelle Obama. However even with the strict new guidelines and new healthier food based programs children are still receiving highly processed foods that school districts are eligible to purchase at a reduced cost through commodities.

Have you ever been so hungry, but you were forced to wait in the dreaded lunch line? Kids need a hearty meal so they can focus more on their work and get good grades. I want to have the opportunity to finish the lunch I paid for. Students won't be able to finish their lunch if changes aren't made to the everyday schedule.