School Lunches Research Paper

School cafeterias have been notoriously known for having unhealthy, unappealing food. Students at schools are being forced to eat these foods, when parents cannot provide regular lunches for their children. These lunches usually include the following: pizza, soda, cheeseburgers, chicken sandwiches, and others, all filled with artificial ingredients and preservatives. To address this problem, there should be a switch between the foods and drinks being served, and I have just the ideas that will be delicious and healthy. Authors Alice Waters, Katrina Heron, and Mark Bittman all agree that some initiative needs to be taken to fix this unhealthy food problem, and so do I. Together, the student body and parents will address the school board with healthier food options that are better tasting and better for the body.

Over the years, school lunches have become a very large issue in our country. Not only are they disgusting, they are unhealthy and should not be served to anybody let alone kids. In the video, “What’s wrong with school lunches,” led by Ann Cooper, she held several very strong arguments regarding school lunches. Ann cooper made several important points on what is wrong with school lunches. She mainly spoke about how it is very necessary to expose kids to healthy foods, and that we have to teach them why it is so important to consume healthy foods rather than foods that are processed. She explained that the way that all of these unhealthy/processed foods are advertised, play a very large role on not only children’s lives, but also everybody’s

Students are taking it to social media to demonstrate against the meal rules lobbied by First lady Michelle Obama. Lunches include tiny portions, mushy and unrecognizable menu items, a lettuce-and-cheese sandwich and chicken nuggets void of any chicken. School nutrition directors say the rules have proven to be costly and restrictive. House Republicans are making a final push this month to give schools a temporary break from the meal standards. School lunches have never been known for being appetizing — but these ones are particularly disgusting. Students across America are taking it to social media to demonstrate against the school meal rules championed by First Lady Michelle Obama.They're using the sarcastic hashtag 'Thanks, Michelle Obama'

Many kids throughout the United States (U.S.) attending public schools are continuously being labeled as overweight. A reason for this is because schools are not providing healthy lunches. School lunches are full of saturated fats and refined sugars, which contribute to problems like obesity. Despite this connection, there are some states that are deciding to drop out of the healthier lunch programs, because the cost is too high and the districts cannot afford to participate. Healthy food leads to improvements all over ones body system. For example Vitamin K, which is found in yellow and orange fruit and vegetables or whole wheat, gives more energy than fats and sugar. Improving the healthier lunches nutrition have the potential to benefit

School lunches, they already suck, so they might as well be healthy. Changing the lunch program, no matter how much grumbling may occur, is a long term solution for childhood obesity. Unhealthy but tasty lunches provide only short term satisfaction, and even though students may complain about rancid lunch foods, it does not affect the entire day.

School lunch is horrible! There is hardly any food to eat, it costs way too much, there are almost no choices for food, and there isn't any time to eat it. The one school rule that needs to be changed is the lunches and everything about them because in order to be able to focus in school, you need the right amount of nutrition.

Lunch is a very vital part of our day. Lunch provides one-third of our total calories for the day. A healthy lunch leads to a more nutrient intake per day. School lunches provide some healthy food, but not all. Many of the foods at our schools lead to obesity.For example, nachos leads to obesity. I thought they changed the school lunches to make them healthier. According to research done by “Journal of school Health”, the healthier our luncher are the the average student does in class.

The lunch bell sounds and students run to get an nutritious meal but, it's really not nutritious.

School lunches, the fight to provide healthy food for kids at school, is a battle that has been going on for years with little progress. Here at SVMS, precautions have been made to help kids make healthy choices, sugary sodas aren’t sold, candy isn’t available for kids to purchase, and there is a health program that teaches kids about nutrition, but kids can still be found with lunches made completely up of chips and other unnatural food products. I think there is a different approach to helping kids get the proper nutrition, by focusing not so much on the calories and percent of sugar in each food item, but the context of where the food came from, and how the kids attain it.

The topic that I thought I should shine some light on are our public school lunches and how unhealthy they really are for kids. Furthermore, how we should provide free lunches to all of the children, because most kids struggle with paying for their lunches at school for all sort of reasons and in some cases school is the only place they get to eat because home life cant afford enough food on some days. Personally, when I attended a public school I received a free lunch because of my parents low income, but I remember the food that was served at our school and it was greasy and not the healthies choice. Also, there were numerous accounts where school was the only time I got food for the day because my parents struggle financially at times. Even

Have you ever been really hungry at school? School lunches are just not appetizing or fulfilling for many students. Most schools don’t allow other companies to sell foods at there schools. I think schools should allow fast foods options to be sold at school because students should be allowed to decide what they eat and can less food and money can be wasted.

At any other school, lunch time is the favorite part of the day. Students have complained for the longest time to have better food at school. School lunch is what will tie your child over until they arrive home from school. All children need food that will help them grow. Schools should be responsible for supplying healthy food. If students are required to pay for lunch shouldn't it be made with passion?

School lunch needs to change because it is not satisfying all student needs.School lunch is unhealthy.Also it’s deceptive and not universal to most kids.I know this because I have seen what they serve at my local middle school and it is not pallatable.If I were to change it I would make better choices,combinations,and overall make the food taste better.This topic is important because school lunch is supposed to nourish you to get through the rest of the day.

Who needs exercise, when getting to lunch first is a competitive sport. When getting in line first, it’s a test to see who can run as fast as they can without being caught by a teacher. Though to be able to function in the class, a normal teenager needs a proper lunch that needs to be edible. At Wilson Southern Middle School, lunch is always a problem. Having lunch there, is never a guarantee of what an edible meal. Some students have been seen with pieces of hair or chunks of hair in their tray , but is quickly carried away to the trash can. The milk might be chunky, and the “meat” that they serve, may not actually be real meat. Southern lunches are not something that are usually healthy to eat.

Have you ever asked yourself, “is this school serving me actually healthy food?.” Well let me tell you, you wouldn’t be the first to ask. Our schools get us our lunch with the help of an organisation call The National School Lunch Program (NSLP). All schools lunches must meet meal patterns and nutrition standards based on the latest Dietary Guidelines for Americans in order to receive the help from this organisation (As said in the NSLP website). What that means is that depending on the meal pattern, the availability of fruits, vegetables, and whole grain in the school menu. The meal patterns dietary specifications also set specific calorie limits to ensure age-appropriate meals for all grades from K-12, and other enhancements include gradual reductions in the sodium content of the meals. What I'm trying to say is that the NSLP only tells the school to reach the required a necessary amount of nutrients, and calories, etc., but it's the school are the ones that decide from where they get the food we eat.