Science And Rachel Carson Similarities

And then towards the middle of the 1600, when the Scientific Revolution was beginning, women slowly began to work with the fields of math and science. Even though they

As per research ‘gender’ provides a perspective from which one could examine the biases that exist in the larger society. Some believe that to arrive at a more eloquent understanding of the problems of women in science , one should begin by asking what is the nature of science space that leads to under-representation and marginalisation of women rather than questioning the situation of a woman’s life that makes it difficult for her to pursue science.

Many women have had an impact on science over the years and their accomplishments tend to be underappreciated by the public eye. Often times, there are important people that have made a significant impact on the world that we have today that do not receive the credit and attention that they deserve for their accomplishments. Recognizing and acknowledging people that have made an impact on society now and in the past, is an important part of learning about history and the accomplishments of the past.

Throughout Gender and Race in the Physical Sciences, I have been struck by how rarely in STEM we shed a light on the women of color that already exist and thrive in the sciences. Often, when we discuss diversity in the sciences, we only discuss it in the frame of a problem. More specifically, we tend to focus on the problem of there not being enough of these women in the field. As a result of the lack of attention paid to pioneering women in STEM, many young people of all backgrounds are inclined to believe that there are no women of color doing great things in the field- that there are no role models. With this paper, and an on-campus event to be held in the spring, I hope to challenge people’s assumptions about what a scientist looks like, and inspire people through a discussion of innovative women of color.

In the third grade, my life was altered when I read an abbreviated biography about Jane Goodall the primatologist. I have always had a passion for discovering the world around me, specifically the animals and environment, but Goodall elevated my own desire for exploration to a new level. I was struck by a young female scientist pursuing her dreams in the field of biology and the significant impact she had in the scientific world. Jane Goodall managed to bring passion and emotion to her observations of chimpanzees at a time when observational science was extremely concerned about remaining objective. She silently proved every critic of hers wrong by showing the world that she was not too young, too inexperienced, or too female to change the

Women have been in science for as long as anyone else, but more often than not, their work in the field is discredited because they're female.

The part of woman in today's general public is some way or another questionable. Why there are so few women in science written by K.C. Cole, the author discusses the role of woman in our society in different domains. The author used personal experience to discuss and give more credibility concerning this topic. Also, K.C. Cole insisted that we are still living in a society where women are not taking all their right. In addition, women have the ability to achieve their goals if they do not give up and get influenced by others (Cole, n.d). If we give women the chance to show what she’s thinking and planning of, it can end up with a very high achievement. In my opinion, women are still less than men in some critical positions although the primary subject these days is gender equality and rights.

With this week’s reading material, the illustration of the social role that women held in the era of Scientific Revolution was painted very clearly. The role that women held was mainly to feed their family, clean, and attend to whatever needs their family may need. However, there were some women that were self determined to be different than the typical social role. These women discovered new things and kept discovering even when the society around them told them it was not acceptable. These women were not recognized for their accomplishments and some were not even bothered that they were not recognized at all. For example, Caroline Herschel worked alongside her brother and helped him discover many things but was never insistent on being recognized

Science knows no gender as predominant, yet some astute minds believe that women are inferior, acting solely as the men’s impuissant counterpart. During the Scientific Revolution in the 17th and 18th century, women’s contributions to science were largely overlooked by supposedly more radical male scientists such as Galileo and Newton. The controversy circumventing their revelations drew more attention than lesser-known scientists, especially women. Women who scour evidence for their findings remain disputed for inaccuracies not for their content, but for their gender. The stigma against women in scientific fields during the Scientific Revolution revolved around a domestic, passive lifestyle behind their husbands. Thus, women’s participation

In Science and Social Inequality, Sandra Harding argues that both the philosophy and practices of modern Western science ultimately function to advance global social inequalities. Drawing on feminist, postcolonialist, multicultural, and antiracist critiques of Western science, Harding supports this argument and exposes the ways in which modern Western science engenders social injustices particularly within the contexts of militarism, environmental destruction, and Western expansion. Through the nuanced and multilayered review and analysis of these critiques, Harding proposes ways to re-conceptualize the sciences and formulates a persuasive case for the emergence of feminist, practice-focused philosophies of science.

Rachel Carson was a scientist and author who took a topic which had hitherto been only of interest to fellow scientists and opened it up to the masses. During her lifetime, she took up many causes in support of wildlife and the protection of species and protecting the natural landscape from potential molestation from developers and others who would destroy indigenous habitats. Among her many missions was to make people aware of the hazards of certain chemicals on the environment, such as pesticides on vegetation as examined in her most famous work Silent Spring.

In the History of Astronomy, there exists a woman by the name of Caroline Herschel who did not only make many new discoveries but paved the path for woman to higher themselves in society. Caroline even became the first woman to hold a government position in England. Not to mention that Caroline and her brother, William, reformed the idea of the universe as mechanical with God watching over everything to a more evolutionary, modern ideal.

Animal science is a field heavily associated with farmers, veterinarians, and other professions, but it is also a field that is heavily associated with men. Veterinary medicine has become a female dominated field over the past decade, but that hasn’t tipped the balance in other aspects of this field. When asked about farmers and animal researchers people begin to think about men, but this field features some incredibly intelligent and progressive women. Temple Grandin and Jane Goodall are two of the most well known and respected female animal scientists in the world. These women have dedicated their lives to animal science

Quote #1: “The scientific pursuits of early modern European women were, for the most part, ignored or undervalued” (Mendelson, 11).

Feminist interaction with the philosophy of science, and in particular a feminist interpretation of epistemology, concerns the extent to which bias influences and shapes knowledge within the scientific community, and means to rectify this. There are three main distinctions of feminist philosophy of science - feminist empiricism, standpoint theory, and postmodernism. I am to be comparing and contrasting two of the three, specifically feminist standpoint theory and empiricism. I shall argue that standpoint theory and empiricism are both legitimate methods for feminist epistemology, yet standpoint theory is a more applicable and plausible method for the analysis of science in particular. I will first explain the main tenets of the feminist philosophy of science, going on to then explain reasons why standpoint theory and postmodernism are legitimate tools of analysis in their own right, and then evaluate their legitimacy.