Science Supporting Mental Illness And The Diagnosis Thereof

The science behind mental illness is complicated and has not yet been completely figured out by scientists, so misconceptions about and misuse of mental illness are commonly seen because of it. For example, OCD, or Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, is often used as an adjective or synonym to a perfectionist. Or, those who are feeling sad one day may say they are depressed. This could be seen as normalizing, but for the wrong reason: it removes the legitimacy of the disorder. The reason why people do this is because they do not understand how mental illness works and where it comes from. Many believe it is fluid or spontaneous, while some simply believe it is not a real illness at all. The brain is an organ capable of becoming ill, just like every

The DSM IV-TR, published by the American Psychiatric Association, is the authoritative book for clinicians, psychiatrists, therapists and other healthcare professionals who diagnose mental disorders. It lists the diagnostic criteria and features, differential diagnoses, course and prevalence of the disease. It is the go-t

The episode of the Jim portrayed in the case falls in the dimension of Axis II. The present edition of DSM-IV published in 1994, offers virtually 400 disorders (Crowe, 2000). The advantage of this is that it enhances diagnostic impartiality by adding decision trees demarcating significant characteristics of disorders, which makes clinicians by collections of questions concerning the presence or the absence of the symptoms. The present DSM-IV manual comprises of extensive anthology of information organized into portions for easier reference (Purse, 2009). The first section encompasses instructions on the way to use the tools contained in the DSM-IV, while following section contains comprehensive classification systems catalog of the official codes for each single diagnosis. The fourth section comprises of the manual detailing the diagnostic criteria accompanied by a description for each disorder. Despite the advantages highlighted above, there are some disadvantages in the manual compilation. First, the DSM-IV compilation lacks the exactitude in diagnostic criterion to evidently, differentiate one diagnosis from the other as well as the distinguishing mental disorder, from the situation, such as mental distress. DSM is not visibly clear on how experiences and behaviors cited within the diagnostic criterion justifiably can consider as substantiation of mental disorder as distinctive from rejoinders to life events (Crowe,

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) has a number of features. First of all, every disorder is identified using a name and a numerical code. In addition, the manual provides the criteria for diagnosing each disorder as well as establishes subtypes of a disorder and examples that would illustrate the disorder. The manual goes further by addressing the typical age of onset, culturally related information, gender-related information, prevalence of a disorder, typical clinical course of a disorder, typical predisposing factors of a disorder and genetic family patterns of a disease (Summers, 2009). The DSM-IV is a tool that is used by mental health practitioners and social service workers. As has been demonstrated

The DSM is used as a standard of reference for psychological diagnosis. The DSM was originally published in 1952 containing only 106 diagnoses; today the revised DSM-IV-TR contains 365 diagnoses. Throughout the history of the DSM, individuals in the mental health profession have relied on it for clarification of disorders, facilitating research, improving communication with other professionals and improving the collection of clinical information. With a new DSM-V underway, there has been a lot of issues surrounding the contents and classifications of the new DSM. There are

There hope is to diagnosis and treat the illness at hand. This article questions the validity of diagnosing each patient. If the doctors or the nurses’ diagnosis is wrong then, the treatment will also be wrong. This can create complications for all parties at hand. Most often there is protocol that most doctors have to follow when diagnosing a patient “However, it should not be forgotten that they are all using same diagnostic manual, and probability of diagnosing a person is in depression with same instructions.”(). Now this makes a person question whether the validity is of the doctor or the protocol. If it is the protocol than that is something that needs to be evaluated. At the time the DSM system was in use for diagnosing a patient. At the time of this experiment Rosenhan used the DSM-II statistical evaluation. Years later this statistical data was look over, “According to Mattison, Cantwell, Russell, Will (1979) general inter-rater reliability of DSM-II was about %57 and %54 for axis I in DSM-III. In DSM III, which is published twelve years later after first version of DSM II, reliability scores of psychosis, conduct disorder, hyperactivity, and mental retardation was slightly higher than general reliability scores; however, as it is accepted today with the circumstance of logical base, reliability under 0.7-0.8 is found questionable and possibility of error is

The controversy and criticism surrounding the DSM -5 models has raised questions about its credibility and has raised concerns from the public on the reliability and effectiveness. Problems with this classification system is the attempt to promote preventive psychiatry by introducing how

Being able to form a diagnosis properly for a client is a process that is wide-ranging and broad. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013) supports recommendations and standards for identifying a diagnosis for a client. The procedure of diagnosing is more than skimming for symptoms in the DSM; one must assess, interview and identify issues, as well as refer to the DSM for a diagnosis.

In Conclusion, they began by examining two of the major approaches to psychopathology research and theory: the medical model and the biopsychosocial model. The latter has clear advantages over the former: a more sophisticated and comprehensive understanding of psychological disorder is possible. Such a biopsychosocial is really a call for interdisciplinary cooperation in the study of psychopathology, a cooperation that has not historically been a reality. Nevertheless, as they have seen, there are some criticisms that can be leveled at both the medical and biopsychosocial models. If they do indeed embody assumptions of weakness and deficits, then there may be undesirable implications for how we conceptualize and treat people with (so called?) psychological disorders.

The ICD-10 International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (2010) was invented by the world health organisation WHO, (1992). Mental health professionals follow this criteria as a guideline, as a means of determining a mental disorder and reaching a diagnosis in patients. According to the ICD-10 (2010) at least one of these signs or symptoms such as Thought echo, thought insertion , withdrawal, thought broadcasting, delusions of control, delusions of perception should be present. Exhibiting either two symptoms such as ; hallucinatory voices commenting or discussing the patient in third person , persistent delusions and persistent hallucinations, Neologisms,

DSM-IV TR, which stands for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edition), Text Revision was published by the American Psychiatric Association in 2000 and serves as a guide book for many health professionals to diagnose a patient with a mental disorder. It also helps health professionals to determine what types of treatment could be carried out to help the patient. The latest DSM is widely used, especially in the USA and many European countries.1However, it may not be completely followed by health professionals as they know that there are some weaknesses of the latest version of DSM as well. This essay will discuss the strengths and

Clinicians and researchers prior to admitting the mentally suffered people go through the diagnosis process. On the basis of diagnostic results, clinicians label the mentally disorder patients. The diagnostic labeling process help clinicians and researchers to distinguish patient groups by a set of definable boundaries (Garand, Lingler, Conner, & Dew, 2010, para. 6). At the one hand, the

A. Thesis: The Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders First Edition (DSM-I), published in 1952, was one of the most significant events in psychology because it standardized the way that mental illnesses were diagnosed. B. Clarification: “Before the concept of making a universal system of diagnosing disorders, every hospital and treatment center had their own method of diagnostics.” C. Organization: Many things happened before and around the time of the publication of the first edition of the DSM. These events led to the problem of everyone using a different method of diagnosis. People all over the world were affected by this problem, so it became clear that something needed to

One of the controversies in development of DSM-5 that is captured in the reading is the expansion of diagnostic disorder that came to be dubbed as diagnostic inflation. The word inflation means there was minimal consideration of the consequences of adding the new disorders. This is clearly captured in the words of Chairperson of DSM-IV, Frances who stated that the introduction of new disorders and changed in the definition of existing disorders may medicalize behavioral problems that may be do not qualify to be classified as such. One example is that of labeling repeated temper tantrums in children as disruptive mood dysregulation. The greatest challenge that mental illness is confronted with is that of stigmatization, hence any behavior that

At the beginning of the semester, I had thought of mental health as a simple term that defined a person’s well-being. However, after taking this course, I have been exposed to different perspectives on the term mental health by watching videos, hearing my classmates own lived experiences, and learning about the DSM-5. The first new perspective that I have gained from this class is the logistics of someone’s mental health, in which a person’s mental health would be diagnosed. Through the DSM-5, we as professionals can better understand a person’s state of mental health as we review the criteria for certain disorders. It also allows us to educate ourselves on the different disorders that may not be familiar. In