Screen Time Limits Are Vital For Children: Article Analysis

This paper explores the research findings on how screen time can effect children and their personalities and cognitive development. I have found four credible articles on these subjects from online sources and scholarly publications. These articles discuss the results of different studies about children’s exposure to television and online content and how they have negative effects on the developing child’s brain in terms of cognitive development and personality traits.

In my opinion children should not be restricted from spending time in front of media screens. One reason why children should'nt be restricted to media screens is because teconology gives children who are visual learners acces to educational videos where they would learn faster than reading about it. Another reason is because since 2015 the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) changed their guidelines for children screen watching. They now support children and parents to play video games together. Also children have showed researchers that watching TV with their parents has reduced anger and fear.

Screen time is very unhealth for children who dont get out and play. playing outside is very health for kids, while helping develop emotional health, imagination, and problem sloving skills. All while be activie, and playing with friends.

Statistics show that screen time negatively affects children’s learning abilities and development. “The effects of so much screen time can include speech delays, aggressive behavior and obesity.” (Lavey) Since parents play a role in how much television their kids can watch, they can minimize the chances of their brains not developing correctly. “The first 2 years of life are considered a critical time for brain development. TV and other electronic media can get in the way of exploring, playing, and interacting with parents and others, which encourages learning and healthy physical and social development.” (Kids Health) Children do

Screen time is going to happen in a childs life weather it be monitored by the parent or not. I believe that its important for children to be physicaly active as well as mentaly. I somewhat agree that watching tv is not good for children, however if shows are designed to teach children I feel that it could be very benificial for the childs development. I feel that children should be allowed to play outside with proper safety and supervision to encourage real world development, but when they are inside they are most likely to have a screen in front of them. I think because of that fact, we should select content that aids in developing mental health. Such as parents playing video games with their children. I feel that parents playing video games

How would you feel if your child became a home body because, you never inforced the rules of TV time?

Most children today have access to devices such as television, smartphones, computers, and tablets. These devices can be used in a variety of ways, with both positive and negative outcomes. For example, preschool aged children may use a device to learn letters, numbers, or colors. School aged children may use a computer to conduct research, or watch an educational show. A child may also sit in front of the television for many hours, reducing physical activity, and become obese. I believe it is important for the parent or caregiver of the child to monitor the amount of screen time, as well as the content to optimize the benefits these devices can offer.

Screen time limits are vital for children today. Children should be restricted, even for only short periods of time, from spending time in front of media screens. Studies show television viewing by preschoolers lowers executive functions. Time on media screeens can also take tolls on kids mentally and phisically. However, acoording to a new study, helps toddlers improve their vocabulary. Let me further explain.

In my opinion, both of the articles identify many factors about children playing video games, watching too much television, and how it affects the child in the long run. Studies show that it can make the child less socialable, in which I would have to agree because, they are not having any physical interaction with anyone. I have young children and I am a firm believer that children do need to go outside and play instead of sitting in front of an electronic device. I do believe that 7.5 hours is way too much time out of the day to be just sitting there.

Screen time for children is helpful and it also can be harmful. Screen time could hurt the children's developmental skills if watched for long periods of time. As said in the first passage if watched for an average of 7.5 hours per day it can cause kids to zone out and confuse their body clocks. Screen time can aslo disrupt sleep and possibly cause depression as well as obesity. Childred should have a balance of screen play. In the second passage it shows that Researchers found that when kids watched television with parents, it reduced anger and fear and increased learning. The second passage also states that visual learners gain far more from watching an education video of a process than they would just reading about it. From my opinion,

Lately, the issue of excessive screen time is becoming increasingly important in pediatrics, and it has become a major risk factor for many chronic conditions such as vision impairment, obesity, and altercations to social behavior. While many parents realize that excessive screen time is harmful, children are still spending eight to ten hours on their electronic devices. Not many parents realize that proper regulation is also needed to keep their child safe from health risks. According to the National Heart, Blood and Lung Institute, 28 percent of parents set TV-watching rules, 30 percent set rules about video game use, and 36 percent of parents set rules about computer use (“Reduce Screen Time”, 2013). This is a problem because 60 percent of children are constantly stumbling upon explicit content every year, and their behavior shifts more negatively and aggressively (Lunsford, 510). I believe that too much screen time can pose much harm to a child’s health and well-being. If we don’t find ways to limit excessive screen time than children will face many consequences that will ultimately harm them as they grow older.

One of the most well known arguements of our time is not a hard concept to grasp. From limiting the time infront of a screen, to completely disregaurding any possibe flaws with screen viewing, both sides of this debate have their pros and cons.

My opinion on the issue of whether or not children should be restricted from spending time in front of media screens is, they should be able to spend at least a couple hours a day watching tv, playing video games, etc. Another thing is kids should be outside playing too, it doesn't mean they should pick one or the other.

I beielve that there should be less time that children have "screen-time" but I also beileve that children really can learn and gain social skills by communicating through a screen with family members as said in the text. I also beileve that having a whole bunch of "screen-time" can cause you to zone out at anytimne and any place, such as school or class. In the text it says that "screen-time" takes a mental and physical toll of children; this is very true, if they arent outside how are they getting their workout that they need daily. Staring at a screen can make you lazy, so you might not want to get up from the screen to make a full meal which leads you to pcking up a snack or junk food just to sit back down. Doing this wont allow you to

This view is supported by Webster-Stratton who described television as “rendering children passive” and referred to research indicating that excessive exposure to television and computers “place children at risk for harmful effects on their physical, social and psychological development”. As a way of mitigating this, she suggests watching television or computer games with the child in order to address any issues that might arise or to identify inappropriate content (2006, p234-236).