Seagate Case

In the years since, Cumulus has had its own financial troubles and as of 10/10/2017 is trading at $0.34 a share. However, because it’s been over five years since the acquisition there is no way to know whether or not Farid still owns these shares or has since reinvested them).

For calculations of the acquisition price, the P/E is taken to be 8.6. The acquisition price is calculated by multiplying this value with the historical average of net income. Thus, the acquisition price comes out to be $186,215,800, which is $189,186,673 less than the enterprise value.

In addition, the cash proceeds of the buyout of Seagate’s operating assets will be distributed, along with all the cash in excess of the $765 million delivered to the buyout investors, among the existing shareholders of Seagate at the time of the buyout.

The share price of $270,000 was significantly higher because the “fair value” as perceived by the dissenters, which accounted for the chance of an IPO. Taking into account the recently traded Kohler Co. share prices, the book value of a share, and the possibility of an IPO greatly inflated what the perceived value of each share should be. While Kohler believed their voting control and ownership structure would remain the same, the shareholders believed otherwise. Because shareholders assumed Kohler would go public, they argued for a higher valuation so as to receive the highest price, and thus profit, in the buyout.  So based on the highest MVE, we picked Masco as the comparable firm of choice. Using Masco’s MVE, $9838.8, and LTM EBIAT, $437.3, we solved for Masco’s P/E ratio, which was equal to 22.5. By multiplying the P/E ratio by Kohler’s LTM EBIAT (22.5 * $93.76), we projected a market value of $2,109,610,000.  To solve for estimated share price, we divided the projected market value by 7,587.89, the number of shares outstanding to obtain an estimated share price of $278,023.47. This estimate is near the $270,000 per share offer price.

Pessimistic Case Valuation: We then perform the valuation exactly the same method as expected case. The value of Pinkerton with less gross margin and more working capital needed is $67.1 Million (See exhibit 9 for 5 years valuation and exhibit 10 for terminal value). With lower performance, the value of 34% tax shield is also lower to $10.8 Million (see exhibit 12). Without any additional incremental value to CPP (exhibit 11), total Pinkerton value from 3 sources is $77.9 Million (exhibit 13), which is even less than the original proposed value of $85 Million from Wathen. Financing:

WGD is a distributor that provides winter sports appeal and equipment to suppliers like FastFit. Their main business needs are profit, market capital, market share, operational excellence, and improved decision making

Our estimated cost of capital, 20.81%, is lower than Ricketts’ expected return, 30%-50%, thus the investment is worthy. However, it’s higher than other pessimistic members’ expected return, 10%-15%, making the decision more complex and requiring further valuation。

  As  for  this  case,  we  decided  to  address  the  companies  that  were     2   most  similar  in  size  to  MCC  and  that  were  most  recent  since  the  industry  is  rapidly   evolving,  and  therefore,  valuations  are  also  rapidly  changing.     Discounted  Cash  Flow  Analysis       Finally,

| KCN sells and services microcomputers, networking hardware and software to business customers. KCN is exposed to external shocks and competitive forces in its industry. To effectively compete and succeed, KCN must have

This case study examines the proposed merger of Vulcan Materials and Martin Marietta both providers of construction aggregates. A stock-for-stock merger had the potential of making the company a global leader in construction materials, but was marred by disagreements over executive succession, location of new headquarters and the stock exchange proposed by Martin Marietta. Furthermore, as negotiations deteriorated Martin Marietta attempted a hostile takeover of Vulcan and also tried to get its directors appointed to

in our calculations, as this company exhibited dramatic value differences to others in the sample, (likely to skew our results and prove misleading). Using the average of the revised sample field for each ratio, we inserted Torrington’s values where appropriate to generate an entity value. The findings generated two values for Torrington, 606 million and 398 million. Taking the average of these two numbers, Torrington exhibited a relative value of 502.41 million. Because of the lack of related information given in the case, and the often large differences in measures amongst competitors, different capital structures, internal management strategies, there remained many unknowns in our model. We decided it would be best to use this valuation to reaffirm our assumptions in our DCF valuation. (Please see exhibits)

The 50% premium can be explained by the valuation of the firm based purely on its projected future cash flows and assumed growth rate (value = $391.58 million) plus the added value that the ITS can provide (value = $114.2 million) when the leveraged buyout is completed. There are two components to the ITS or income tax shield –

Current market prices: Both McCaw and AT&T’s common shares are publicly traded. The market value of the equity can be summed with the book value of debt to give a rough estimate of the firm’s current value. The calculation that follows suggests a value for McCaw’s assets of about $10.5 billion. McCaw’s shares may be trading at a minority discount, because the CEO holds a controlling block of shares. To purchase a partial

4. Consider the Worldcom-MCI merger and the Qwest-US West merger. Trying to avoid hindsight bias, should the board of MCI and US West have accepted these offers? What is the obligation to shareholders? Was that obligation fulfilled? What about WorldCom and Qwest? Did their shareholders benefit?

Analysts estimate that the $80 million in cost saving could be realized after the acquisition , however certain other costs associated with the integration approximately $130 million would occur .Hence, I take these cost savings and integration costs into consideration for the with-synergies valuation. Incorporating the effects of 80million cost savings for the merged firm (to be achieved by end of 2007 and assumed to incur in perpetuity then on) and 130 million integration costs (half of this accounted at the beginning years) in the estimated EBITs for Torrington, a new horizon value is estimated, the new FCF is discounted by acquiring company’s WACC 8.39%. Torrington company’s with- synergies valuation $1386.38 million exceeds the value as a stand-alone entity by approximately $286 million. sheet2: With-synergies Valuation of Torrington-DCF Method.