Second Amendment Rights Research Paper

“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” - Second Amendment. Throughout history, this sentence of twenty seven words has caused an intense debate. The polemic is that some people claim that a gun control policy is unconstitutional, while others disagree and even say it is necessary in order to reduce crime. Now, what does gun control mean? If it means to analyze who is responsible enough to own a gun by a “Universal Background Check”; that sounds right to everyone. But in the article “What Are Obama’s Gun Control Proposals? An Easy Guide” published in the National Journal by Matt Vasilogambros. The author states that the “gun-control

Guns, used for a wide variety of things, such as hunting, sports, and defense. Though destructive, guns have their uses. But what allows citizens to own guns in the U.S.? The answer to that question is the 2nd amendment. The amendment states that citizens can bear guns, and that a free state should have a good militia. At the end of the amendment, the amendment states that it should not be infringed. Back in 2012 Obama was claimed to try to take away guns. Should guns be taken away from U.S. citizens, or even the whole second amendment? Well, the second amendment should not be taken away, because guns provide defense against attackers, state militias provide more safety, and the amendment itself says it should not

     Gun control is a very controversial issue among society at present. Many feel guns are the cause of a great amount of crime. This has been an especially popular topic recently in lieu of the shooting at Columbine and other high schools across the country. Are these crimes reason to take away our freedom to bear arms? I do not believe so. The average person uses guns mainly as a means of protection. If limitations are placed on guns, they will only stop the average American from obtaining a gun. The real criminals out there will still be able to obtain guns through the black market. Every American should have the right to protect them self.

Every citizen should be able to protect themselves, their families, and their property. If it takes a gun to do this, then by all means, we should be able to have them in our possession. If guns were taken away from the honest people, the dishonest people would find ways to get them, and without a means of protection how could we protect what is ours. What I am trying to say is if having a gun in your possession may keep someone from trying to harm us, what we have, and own, then guns do not need to be taken from us. Maybe more restrictions should be placed on purchasing guns; for example, fines put on people having guns in their possession that are not registered to them, and also fine the person the gun is registered too. Law enforcement agencies should be notified if a gun is no longer in the possession of the person it was

“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The second amendment to the United States constitution could be the most important of all the amendments, because without the right to bear arms, it is very possible that we would still be part of the British empire. Without the colonists, right to keep and bear arms, the militia would have never been possible and we surely would have lost the revolutionary war.

“We don’t have the freedom of speech to talk about the weather. We have the first amendment so we can say some very controversial things”-Ron Paul, but we weren’t given the first amendment to disrespect the free thoughts, feelings religions, sexuality and skin color of others. The first amendment guarantees freedom concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It forbids Congress from both promoting one religion over others and also restricting an individual’s religious practices. It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. It also guarantees the rights of citizens to assemble peaceably and to petition to their government (First

Unfortunately, many people possess guns would should not posses one. However I do not see it feasible to strengthen guns laws. I believe that there should be stronger penalties for people who are caught with a gun illegally and stronger penalties for people who are or threaten violence with a gun. This would make people think twice about smuggling a gun, or carry them when they are not supposed to. This might also influence Congress to pass a law for a stronger background check on people purchasing a gun, which would satisfy both sides of this argument. A stronger penalty for gun offenders might cause the amount of violence without a gun to rise a

After reviewing the given information from Ms. Bennett, there is a strong possibility the court will find the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights were not violated. The Fourth Amendment states:

The First Amendment contains a list of fundamental freedoms: of religion, speech, press, assembly, petition calls on the Government. Because these rights and freedoms are regarded as natural, ie not require legal amendment consolidating in shape is a ban on the adoption by the US Congress any law limiting these rights and freedoms. Political rights and freedoms shall not be considered as absolute, abuse and misuse entail criminal prosecution. That is, freedom of religion means that you can you believe in anyone. For example, if you believe in the unicorn is not someone you can not stop

Well I would let others to express their political beliefs even if I didn’t agree because the idea of first amendments rights include freedom of speech, religion, and press which allows them to do so. But if they are unconventional participation in actives they believe in them which can lead to violence, civil disobedience, and vandalism. I think that’s not expressing the first amendments rights because you’re breaking the law and doing things in a non-peaceful way. I would let other write petitions, attend rallies, from groups, vote, and have protests if they are peaceful. I think that we as people are not free to a certain extend we are somewhat free to express ourselves on what we may feel is right or wrong. For example some employees at

I think they should keep gun control because gun control you will be able to protect yourself and your family. If someone robs your house and they have a gun you will be able to protect yourself instead of hide and hope you don’t get found and possibly killed or hurt you have more of a chance of getting hurt if you can’t have conceal and carry or a firearm in your house hold but you should have to take a safety class and have a good background with no felonies or weapon charges and you should only be allowed to walk around with a hand gun in a holster but when it comes to being at home you should be able to have bigger firearms such as shotguns, ar, and 22’s but no full auto guns. People now a day can’t protect their selves from harm and hope

Controlling what and how many guns citizens have is a very good idea. It is a good idea because when guns are held back from citizens their will be a decrease in : Murders, fatal and careless shootings. The public should be reduced from guns because in the 21st century anyone can get them such as, under aged kids, mentally challenged adults and kids, it could always end

Guns should be allowed to be carried because it gives legal citizens the right to protect themselves from criminals, can reduce mass shooting and deter crime.

In our country of United States people are arguing over the issue of to keep guns or to ban guns. Everyone has their own opinions and think differently about things. I believe that we should be allowed to own guns for many reasons. In the constitution of the United States it states that a well regulated militia, being the best security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. In the second amendment, it says that everyone can own a gun, so I think we should be able to own them. People mainly use guns for protection, and recreational use.

Although I believe there should be a better system in place for a citizen to purchase a gun; I also believe the government should not take them away. America has more guns per capita and yet we have the weakest laws and restrictions. The media loves to portray this concept of “gun control”, however it’s the person who buys the guns that we need to control. Our right to carry guns should not override the fact that the government needs to be more strict on those who are purchasing them. We are all aware that guns don’t kill people, people kill people. This is why I know it is important for our continued safety that the government needs to be more involved in this process without compromising our right to bear arms.