Piper Alpha Fire Tragedy

Proper training and protocols may have solved or prevented the problem. With more problems to add to the list of chain reactions from the accident, the government had to change industry safety which in turn, increased industry safety. New study groups were used to research the incident. New organizations had to be created to conduct proper training implementing the safety measures for the power plant operators. Many new publications had to be brought into existence to have better oversight of nuclear power plant operations. A

According to the IEEE code of ethics, “a person must disclose promptly factors that might endanger the public or the environment.” The engineers here are guilty for not following the IEEE as they would have known the implications of such a disaster and should have tried to warn the company heads or if need be to be more radical, the higher authority which would have stopped

94 seconds after the fire started, the first reached cook-off point. It exploded violently, killing Gerald, most of his team, and half of the pilots in the A-4s. 9 seconds later, the other bomb exploded, opening a hole in the flight deck, allowing the fire to spread below deck.

The accidents happened almost daily and there wasn’t anything that could be done to prevent the accidents from happening except modifying the machines a little more. Factories very much lacked safety.

Many employees have stated that their workplace environments are harmful and unsafe. Employee fatigue, long working hours and the hiring of inexperienced labor have not only led to hundreds of injuries over the last decade but also hundreds of deaths. The Texas City, Texas plant is just one of many in which such “life or death” occurrences have impacted the safety of employees. In 2005 an explosion that killed 15 people has been said to have occurred due to employee fatigue after being forced to work long hours that ultimately contributed to employees making bad decisions.

The safety concerns can be resolved through companywide mandatory safety training. There were only about half of the employees whom felt safe and to increase the percentage safety has to be a top priority of the company. Safety training can be done in various ways such as regular session with supervisors, managers, and employees are often coordinated by HR

Of members of management, as well as, the rank and file and is charged with accident evaluation and procedure development to ensure a safe working environment for all employees. Per the assignment the following topics will be covered as they pertain to the group which will be referred to as the DAPC: the relevant background factors,

MMA could train their employees properly by investing in internal worker training programs which would cater to educating workers on proper safety procedures. This will ensure that both the employees and the company are in good standing (771.v and 77.1.iii). MMA could also conduct scheduled maintenance to ensure that all their train and equipment, including tracks are fit to be on the rail roads and are in great condition as opposed to the marginal conditions which constituted to the disaster. This would help to correct the issues they have with safety management and thus put the company in good standing as per – 77.1.ii and 77.2.i.

Management did not encourage the development of an occupational health and safety committee. The company never encouraged the committee to meet and discuss safety concerns and management was not involved with the committee. There were also problems with mining inspections, government investigations into this problem produced irregularities. Many orders issued by mining inspectors were not carried out. Management and mining inspectors not ensuring that safety standards were followed is a human hazard.

The death tole caused by these explosions is considered the worst industial disaster of all time; resulting in the largest number of casualties in American history. Although a precise death count was never established the Red Cross and the Texas Department of Public Safety published the figures of 405 bodies identified,63 unidentified, and 100 classified as “believed missing” because there was no trace of them ever found. There were also between 3,500 and 4,000 persons injured in the catastrophe. The total property loss was estimated at almost 100 million dollars which

Operators were also responsible for the failure of the auxiliary feedwater pumps, as a test of the “twelves” valves two days before the incident led to them remaining closed until the incident itself, a clear violation of regulations set in place by the NRC. When asked about it post-incident, an operator claimed it was very easy to forget to reopen the valves after a test, whether you just plain forgot or you were relieved at the end of your shift before you could do it.4 Again, this ties to the unbelievable lack of education and micromanagement that was present in a typical operator. Yet another time, the issues tie back to the carelessness of the NRC in preparing its operators for the job.

To provide a further understanding of how the BP Deepwater Horizon (DH) mishap occurred, this report draws upon two applied theories within human error and safety research. Reason’s(1997) Swiss Cheese model of accident causation will be applied to account for the occurrence of macro-system failures that led to the Macondo well blowout. Safety culture theorem will be incorporated to present how poor management fabricated employees’ behaviours and beliefs in reference to safety on the DH(Guldenmund,2000).

Prior to the disaster, the company had been facing a financial crisis for many years because the sale of pesticides had been fallen (Joseph, Kaszniak and Long 2005, p. 544). Due to the budget cuts, many plant operators received insufficient training on operations and safety awareness (Mannan 2012, p. 2649). As shown in Figure 1, there was a decrease in the length of training programmes for plant operators from 18 months in 1975 to only one month in December 1984 (Chouhan 2005, p. 207). Therefore, with a lack of the knowledge of runaway reactions occurring in the storage tank when the accident happened, many workers could not immediately take any emergency action to lessen the risk of the MIC escape from the storage tank (Chouhan 2005, p. 207). To connect the tank with another

Carrying out our daily activities both at home or working environment comes along with all various risks and hazardous dangers. Accidents are uncontrollable to certain levels even if standard policies or procedures are as followed. The main purpose on reporting is that safety lessons can be learned from this big misses and incidents or covering up that any incidents never occurred before. Essay access to reporting an incident with an understanding that reports will be hand in a non-punitive manner, and that will lead to enhanced learning regarding the causation of the event and systemic changes that will prevent it. From recurring as quoted by (Mahajan, 2015). The most frequent question asked during the period of an incident is who should blame for the unfortunate event and occurrence. Performing duties under all hazardous conditions may record certain cases of accidents with the presence of machinery may see the increase in accidents caused by carelessness and hazardous working materials and tools. The main reason of the report is to analyze and determine liability for the saw wood accident involving John Schmidt at the production shop which occurred on June 7.

The accident, which occurred on board of the seaward platform Piper Alpha in July 1988, took lives of 167 people and cost billions of dollars damage of property. The Piper Alpha is placed in the North Sea, around 193 km northeast of Aberdeen. The field was discovered in January 1973 and the same year construction of platform took place. The depth of it was up to 140 m, and at the time the development and installation of the Piper Alpha platform give tongue to a major step in both the development of the UK offshore resources and technology. The basic design of the topsides was establish on those used in the Gulf of Mexico. The platform production of oil started in December 1976 when the first two wells