Section 69a And 79

I am doing an essay on article 86 and 91 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Article 86—Absence without leave and Article 91—Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer I will start out with article 91 section 15 text of statute 2 willfully disobeys the lawful order of a warrant officer , non-commissioned officer, or petty officer. In my essay I will give both facts and opinion on the matter of these articles .In fact in of the case article 91 does not apply in the situation that involves me and fellow NCO’s because in article 91 chapter 15 subparagraph 2, I did not willfully disobey an order . In order to disobey an order the first must be given

Mankind has been fighting for Liberty and Freedom for as long as we can remember. Liberty and freedom has been a topic which has been debated for many decades. What does it mean to be free , and how far can we go to strive for freedom. These important questions have been answered and studied by two of the greatest English philosophers, John Locke and John Stuart Mill. Locke and Mill men will attempt to uncover the mysteries of Liberty and Freedom and unveil the importance of being free. This essay will look at John Locke’s principle works” Second Treatise of government” and John Stuart Mills. “ On Liberty and Other Essays”. This essay will attempt to compare and contrast Lockes ideology on Liberty and Freedom to that of Mill.

John Milton believed in the marketplace of ideas theory. This theory stated that all ideas should be allowed to be dispersed into the public marketplace. After that, these ideas would be weighed individually and then the best ideas would be debated and the outcome would be the truth. This would allow for the public to be able to be involved and decide what ideas would best work for the people at that time. This marketplace of ideas theory was all about the people having a say in what they thought was right for them. In 1644, John Milton spoke about these most compelling arguments on the freedom of press in his book “Areopagitica.”

In the article “Creating a Criminal”, Michael Kingston targets California voters to argue that the new law, Section 598b of the California Penal Code, is simply a law that discriminates a minority group. In his article, Kingston manifests that the new law simply penalizes Vietnamese-American for their culture of raising dogs or pets for food although there had always been practices in American culture that abuse these same pets; such as, the practice of euthanasia on pets whose owners no longer want them, or even the use of pets for scientific experiences. Indeed, Kingston was successful in arguing that the Section 598b in a racially discriminatory law by appealing to logos, ethos and pathos.

Initiatives like any other issues have two sides to it; we must assess both sides to get a better scope of the issue. Contrary to the believe, propositions gave some benefits to the people of California as well as the legislature. In 1911 the California legislature passed the initiative process and was later approved through an election by Californians. By doing so Californians were given the right to directly vote on constitutional amendments and statues. In California, the legislature is prohibited from repealing or amending any statutory initiatives. The first initiative that had a beneficial effect on the legislature is Proposition 1A, which professionalized the California legislature by increasing their salary from $6,000 to $16,000 per

Do ionic compounds conduct electricity as (3 points) Solids No Liquids Yes Aqueous solutions (when the ionic compounds are dissolved in water) Yes Do covalent compounds conduct electricity as (3 points) Solids no Liquids No Aqueous solutions (when the covalent compounds are dissolved in water) No Part I Lab Insert completed data tables for each part of the lab. Be sure that the data tables are organized and include units when necessary. Melting Point (4 points) Conductivity (4 points) Part II Conclusion Answer the following questions in your own words, using complete sentences. Based on your observations in the lab, categorize each unidentified compound as ionic or covalent. Explain in one or two sentences why you categorized the

Larson, John Lauritz. The Market Revolution in America: Liberty Ambition, and the Eclipse of the Common Good. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

The preferred method by many inmates is to file under 42 United States code 1983 or 42 USC 1983. “Section 1983,” as inmates call it, states that if a government official, such as a correctional officer, denies an inmate protection under the constitution, the injured party (inmates) can sue for liability and monetary damages. Inmates have preferred to file Section 1983 suits in federal courts than to file torts in state courts, where the scope of relief is less broad. Also, the federal courts through the hands on era to now have shown more sympathy at time to inmates’ claims. A 1992 study by the National Center for State courts (NCSC) with assistance from the bureau of Justice Statistics studied Section 1983 cases disposed of in the United State.

This paper will discuss John Stuart Mill’s argument about the freedom of expression of opinion, and how Mill justified that freedom. I will also discuss how strong his argument was and whether or not I agree with it. John Stuart Mill was a political economist, civil servant, and most importantly an English philosopher from the nineteenth century. Throughout his writing, John Stuart Mill touched on the issues of liberty, freedom and other human rights. In his philosophical work, On Liberty, he discussed the relationship between authority and liberty, as well as the importance of individuality in society. In chapter two of On Liberty, Mill examined the freedom of expression in more detail, examining arguments for and against his own.

The philosophy of John Stuart Mill has influenced mankind and classical liberalism throughout history. John Stuart Mill, a

In On Liberty (1859), John Stuart Mill was a strong believer of freedom of speech. He identifies the Harm principle to protect the freedom of thought and expression. He argues that people should not be silenced for expressing their opinion or how they feel based on their beliefs. He declares four vaguely arguments and makes several examples as to why freedom of speech is a very important aspect to society. In this paper, I argue that Mill is correct in declaring that we have the right to express our opinions as long as it does not bring harm to others. First, I will define how Mill uses the harm principle to declare his argument and the four distinct reasons for freedom of opinion and the expression of opinion. Secondly, I will declare my viewpoint based on why I agree with the harm principle as well as Mill’s argument following that we have a right to freedom of expression.

Society is a structured hierarchical system of classes. The higher class you hold, the higher power often associated to you. With this construction of society one-group claims dominance over another doing so with “power over” (Bishop, 2015). Power over others can be visible through physical strength, wealth, resources, and access to opportunities, etc. These dominate groups not only spread ideas, but often are in charge of the creation of ideas, their importance, and the norms and roles for society and classes labeling groups different than their own as inferior.

G. Indemnification of Attorney Fees and out-of-pocket costs. Should any party materially breach this agreement (including representations and warranties made to the other side), the non-breaching party shall be indemnified by the breaching party for its reasonable attorney fees and out-of-pocket costs which in any way relate to, or were precipitated by, the breach of this contract (including the breach of representations or warranties). This provision shall not limit in any way the

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceable to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” (Amendment I, The Constitution of the United States of America)

The criticism of a majority opinion is the value of free speech, in order to have a valid opinion you must accept and listen to the criticism of that opinion John Stuart Mill argues that anyone should be able to exercise their freedom of speech as long as it does not negatively affect or harm others. To specify, Mill states that there is no justification in silencing someone’s opinion, no matter if this opinion is right or wrong, or even popular or unpopular. The ability to criticize an opinion is a freedom that we deserve to have, John Stuart Mill goes into