Securitization Benefits

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is the US federal agency that holds the primary mandate to enforce federal securities laws and regulations to control the securities industry and the country’s stock exchange and regulation of all activities and organizations including the US electronic securities market. The SEC is committed to promoting a market environment that yields public trust characterized by integrity to attain its mission of protecting investors through maintenance of fair and efficient markets through facilitation of capital information (Basagne, 2010). The SEC financing is a major area of focus since there has been major concern regarding the SEC agency financing and whether they utilize the

It’s a risk that these investors took where in the end, they were financially hurt by it due to the part of the subprime lenders acting unethically. Not only the subprime lenders, but also the investors because they started to loose their standards once the subprime mortgages were booming and becoming more profitable. The investors were blinded by the profit and not paying attention to the qualities of business and the loans. Once the investors started to loose their standards, that’s when the subprime mortgages were being overlooked in which they were hurt by it.

“There must be a strict supervision of all banking and credits and investments; there must be an end to people’s speculation with other money (pg 92).” The SEC was designed to keep security on Wall Street.

The beginning of the crisis is rooted in banks giving out subprime loans to people who would have not otherwise been given these loans. The banks assumed that these loans could be bundled and the numbers proved that they were safe investments, because enough people would pay their loans back.

In the lead up to the current recession, when the real estate market began to fall, there were so many investors shorting stocks and securitized mortgage packages that were already falling, that the market simply fell further. There were no buyers at the bottom, and the professional investors made millions off of the losses of others. Beyond this, there was no real federal regulation for securitized mortgages, since there was no real way to gauge the mathematical risk of any given package. This allowed the investors to take advantage of the system and to short loans on real people’s homes. Once these securities were worthless, many of the homebuyer’s defaulted on their mortgages and were left penniless. No matter from which angle this crisis is looked at, the blame rests squarely with the managers who began the entire cycle, the ones who pursued the securitization of mortgages. Their incompetence not only led to the losses of Americans who have never invested in the stock market, but to losses for their shareholders.

In 2008, when the financial crisis occurred, millions of Americans were left without jobs and trillions of dollars of wealth was lost wealth. To make sure the Great Recession would not happen again, President Barrack Obama put into effect the Dodd- Frank Act. With the help of this law, banks will not be able to take irresponsible risks that had negative effects on the American people. Furthermore, with the Volcker Rule embedded into the act, it will ensure that banks are no longer allowed to own, invest, or sponsor hedge funds, private equity funds, or proprietary trading operations for their own profit, unrelated to serving their

However, the social security administration is highly efficient in what they do, and the total administrative costs for the social security administration are only 0.7% of their revenue. On the other hand, the average American pays 1% in fees on a 401(k), and while a difference of 0.3% does not seem like a significant amount, this easily grows to tens of thousands of dollars when compounded over the course of an individual’s career. In addition to higher fees, the possibility of losing money to fraud is significantly higher in financial markets. It is estimated that over $2.6 billion in retirement savings is lost annually to fraud, and this number would certainly rise of more people were holding their retirement savings in financial markets. Looking beyond the fees associated with the programs, it cannot reasonably be inferred that a privatized system would have less government oversight.

The problem for banks is that they now can’t use that small percentage of low yielding assets to turn a profit on, and this makes them very sad. You see, bank CEOs don’t really care if their banks fail and millions of American are left in a lurch due to a lack of this protection. They simply want to make as much profit as possible and let the potential carnage to the markets be damned – that’s because the executives of a bank can walk away with all their money, while leaving a decimated stock market behind.

Along with the greater profitability restrictions imposed on banks from the Dodd Frank comes the banks will for greater cost management, meaning job cuts. Already the Banks have begun laying employees off from burdening restrictions leading to this brutal method of retaining necessary capital needed for operations ("Wall Street Journal"). The bigger the bank, the greater resentment they have over this act. Their financial statements will have to retain a greater amount of compliance and transparency as well. Because of the large prominence of “shadow banking” and the concealed balance sheet elements that came along with this practice, the banks now are imposed with greater regulation to prevent these stealthy tactics of borrowing and investing. These restrictions, in my belief, will provide greater protection to the consumer but will also provoke institutions to begin innovating financial instruments to get around barriers, just as they did in the past with interstate banking and early consolidated services even before Glass-Steagalls act. The bankers oppose the act due to their cut in profits. Reduced outlets in revenue from specific revenue generating activities have been capped and larger expenses in order to comply with the new rules have also greatly cut profitability. The same notion is held with brokers. Because of the greater compliance costs served

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is an agency created by the federal government to protect the investors and regulate the securities markets, as well as monitoring the corporate takeovers in the United States (Jones, 112). The SEC oversees security transactions, mutual fund trading, and activities of financial professionals to international deception and prevents fraud. With certain exceptions, the Commission has the authority to regulate trading and issuance of law securities that are offered to the public, it also requires the issuers to provide the investors with sufficient information in order to make informed

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is an important factor to the principal federal regulatory agency. it is an agency that regulates the securities industry. The main goal of the Securities and Exchange Commission is to protect investors and maintain the integrity of the securities markets. Numerous individuals rely on upon the SEC for regulating government securities laws that ensure speculators. The SEC additionally guarantees that securities markets are reasonable and fair and, if fundamental, authorizes securities laws through the proper approvals. Essentially, the SEC directs the exercises of all members in the securities markets—including freely held enterprises, open utilities, venture organizations and consultants, and securities

Demand became so aggressive that too many securitizers and lenders believed they were able to create and sell mortgage backed securities so quickly that they never put their shareholders’ capital at risk and hence did not have the incentive to evaluate the credit quality of what they were selling. Pressures on lenders to supply more “paper” collapsed subprime underwriting standards from 2005 forward. Uncritical acceptance of credit ratings by purchasers of these toxic assets has led to huge losses. It was the failure to properly price such risky assets that precipitated the crisis. In recent decades, a vast risk management and pricing system has evolved, combining the best insights of mathematicians and finance experts supported by major advances in computer and communications technology. A Nobel Prize was awarded for the discovery of the pricing model that underpins much of the advance in derivates markets. This modern risk management paradigm held sway for decades. The whole intellectual edifice, however, collapsed in the summer of last year because the data inputted into the risk management models generally covered only the past two decades, a period of euphoria. Had instead the models been fitted more appropriately to historic periods of

Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) refers to a kind of innovative derivative securities product which simply bundling mortgage debt, bonds, loans and other assets together and then rearranging these assets into different tranches with different credit ratings, interest rate payments, risks, and priority of repayment to meet the needs of different investors. As borrowers began to default, investors in the inferior tranche of the CDOs took the first hit, so the owner of this tranche of CDOs may be riskier. In order to compensate for the higher risk, the subordinate tranche receives higher rate of return while the superior tranche receives lower rate but still nice return. To make the top even safer, the banks ensured it small fee called the credit default swap (CDS). The banks do all of the works so that creating rating agencies will stamp the top tranche since as a safe, triple A rated

In the shadow banking system there is an highly important part in the process which is the securitisation process. The securitisation process is a method where illiquid assets are transformed into liquid tradable instruments. In more detail the securitisation process is a method which gives the banks the opportunity to removes the loans from the asset side of their balance sheet meaning that they evenly spread the associated risks to the other financial units. This could be due to the fact that shadow banks are largely unregulated. However during the financial crisis the shadow banking system also helped magnify the risks in the banks balance sheets since after the financial crisis there was an increase in the regulation in the shadowing banking system.

Although the Paulson Plan held off a major financial crisis and attempted to address many of the issues that were the cause of the crisis, improvements could have been made that would have a more lasting positive effect on the American financial system. According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, the plan needed to achieve at three objectives. It needed to prevent a deep and prolonged recession, achieve that first objective at the lowest possible costs to the U.S. taxpayer, and it should not bail out the existing investors. As stated in the article, “the Treasury plan addresses only the first objective, and only indirectly.” While the article gave many suggestions for improving the plan, perhaps the most useful was the recommendation to require all regulated financial institutions to raise 2% of their assets in additional capital to preserve the stability of the financial system. This mandate should ensure that no individual bank sends an adverse signal to the market, which should cause investors to not lose confidence in the banks.