Self Assessments Analysis

People are created uniquely and different one to another, which results in character and personality differences. The needs of socialising and workplace purposes, such as career development and organisation effectiveness have ‘forced’ people to be more aware and understand their potentials through self-analysis. It requires people to assess themselves as an object in particular event or experience, which enables people to gain self-awareness (De Janasz, Wood, Gottschalk, Dowd, and Schneider, 2007, p.8). Self-awareness is the ability of an individual in assessing others’ evaluations of self and incorporate those evaluations in one self-evaluation, which then would help determine his

The Myers-Briggs Indicator defines me as an “ISTJ,” which stands for “introverted, sensing, thinking, and judging.” It states that I have a “distinct preference for introversion over extroversion.” The introverted character trait is the most plausible, because issues regarding social interaction and outwardly conveying my feelings and emotions have always been a challenge for me. Around the time that I was in elementary school, I was diagnosed with social anxiety. Before, psychiatrists pondered the possibility of me falling on the high-functioning end of the autism scale and nearly diagnosed me with Asperger Syndrome. My social communication skills are lacking. Because of this, I consider making friends and talking to other people my age to be taxing activities.

I discovered that I am an INTJ with a strong preference of introversion over extraversion. The rest of my results are moderate, and I have always known that I am introverted, but I didn’t think it was at such an extreme level. The typology test gave me a staggering one hundred percent preference of introversion over extraversion. According to an INTJ type description, I am a perfectionist who is willing to work at anything until I grasp it. I don’t understand social rituals like, flirting and small talk, and I have a disregard for authority, especially if it limits my work or creativity. However, I am a reliable person who can read and likely understand the mean behind a person's certain tone of voice or facial expression. I agree with quite

The purpose of this paper is to complete an initial self-assessment to determine both educational and academic background. I will also recognize strengths and potential weakness recognized in components of management and leadership roles that I have worked in over the course of my nursing career. Descriptions of the characteristics indicated from the Jung typology test by Humanmetrics, Inc. will be included in the analysis.

This self-assessment will demonstrate the importance of developing a set of responsibilities to become a productive employee for the organization. In this assignment the individual current objectives, and future developing objectives will be discussed. Recommendation on the performance will be made, motivational theories will be analyzed. Solutions to work based problems will be given and the performance of communication in variety styles will be considered .Time management strategies of the individual will be introduced.

I believe if there is a need, there must be a way to fix it. I enjoy testing different thoughts e.g. reverse the working time at night in summer to benefit from cooler environment (evaluate the net benefit of working at nights). The process of creation is strict as follow: Whenever I feel there is any needs retrieved from my personal issues, I would try to figure out whether it can be generalized into public shared issues. If so, I will come up with one or several initial option(s) that could possibly solve issues and then evaluate it/them based on my knowledge.

Conducting a self-assessment has proven beneficial in my search for jobs as well as my overall quest to grow as a person. Much like the previous set of assessments, the six new assessments allowed me to further understand how I interact with people as well as my outlook on ethics. When grouped together, the assessments provided and overview of my probable interactions with others. Results indicated that people view me as a trustworthy person, who is very attentive and dependable. In terms of engaging in conflict, I am more likely to try to solve the problem in a way that brings out collaborative and accommodating comprises; however, I am also a person to avoid conflict altogether. I feel as though these skills are very important given the ability

As an older individual who has had several jobs in my twenty-five years of working, I have done several self-assessments. I have always felt they were fairly accurate in describing my personality. I have tried over the years to use these to help myself improve and was successful at my last job as a supervisor and using those skills to improve as a better manager. I have also learned that you cannot change who you are, as I once had a manager tell me I needed to go to school to change myself to be more like her so I could be successful. My relationship with this manager never worked, as I can’t change myself and she never learned how to deal with others who weren’t like her.

It was only after I understood the interdisciplinary and cooperative nature of the College of Human Ecology during my visit to Cornell this past summer that I fully realized the school was the perfect fit for me. While the college’s mission, “To improve lives,” is a simple one, the steps taken to achieve such an objective cuts across multiple disciplines. The information session reinforced my understanding that science, math, economics, human psychology and an understanding of cultural diversity all play a strong role when formulating public policy. As a high school debater, I examined every side of a given resolution, researched existing governmental policies and used compelling evidence in order to prove assertions. Amongst the various

I believe that self-assessments are important for a person to partake in because it helps one to make an informed career decision. It helps you know what your values, interest and personality are. It also lists your jobs, skills and training which can serve as a clue as to what job will be a perfect

The self-assessment test, on page 22, of our textbook, was to help us to better understand our thoughts and beliefs regarding ethics and social responsibility. I scored a 37 and according to our text, I “tend to put ethics and social responsibility before profit” (Phillips/Gully, pg. 22)

In the personal assessment it asked a series of questions that directed my explanatory style to being very or typically pessimistic as well as optimistic. The interpretation that the personal assessment described about me was that I tend to have an average level of pessimism about negative events and optimism about positive events.

I do agree with the results of the Meyers Briggs Type indicator. Extravert over Introvert,. According to Don Hellriegel author of Organizational Behavior, 13th edition, extraverts are comfortable talking with others, speaking up in group, and are assertive (80). These are qualities that I have always possessed since childhood. It is important to me to stay focused on the world around me rater than the world within me.

According to “Where does your energy come from” test, the Myers Briggs dimensions showed I was an ISTJ; this mean I related more towards being Introverted, Sensing, Thinking and Judging (2002). I agree with all four of these dimensions as they match up to what my dimensions have been in the past. First, according to Robbins and Judge, an extroverted individual is one that is “outgoing, sociable and assertive” (2016 p68). I agree with this wholeheartedly; I don’t

I was able to take three assessments that were able to tell me about my interests, skills, possible jobs and education degrees that I could potentially pursue. The names of the three assessments are the: Strong Interest Inventory, Myers- Briggs Type Indicator and StrenghtsQuest. I’m going to take a look at my results for each assessment and compare the similarities as well as the contrast.