Rebuttals
1: - Self-Sovereignty and Association:
My opponent says
"At the root of self-sovereignty is the natural right of self-determination."
"every person has the right to associate with whomever they choose."
This is a nice sentiment, however not a truth empirically evident or plausible applicable in society. Consider, I was born in the United States; I did not choose to be born here. The Constitution, or in other words "social contract," that I am bound to, I did not sign. I did not negotiate the terms by which I am governed. I also am without the means to leave the society in which I was born. So here I am, trapped in a society I did not choose, subject to a contract I did not negotiate. I am seemingly powerless to change my circumstance
…show more content…
If the larger nation becomes despotic or ignorant of the needs of an area in particular, then that area has a duty to throw off the chains of that larger government which bind them so as to provide the area with a more respectable government for its people."
These words reflect the ideas of the Declaration of Independence. Again, this would seem ideal, and the United States did exercise self-determination to a degree at this time. However almost one Hundred years later when the South Seceded from the Union, they were denied the so called "right" to secede. The very nation that perhaps would serve as empirical evidence of the benefits of self-determination, no longer seems to trumpet that right. It does not seem plausible to believe that larger nations would willingly allow groups to become independent from them as empirical evidence has shown otherwise.
I would also point out that the U.S. was largely successful due to outside help from France. I am not currently aware of a case where the "oppressed" have been able to "throw off the chains" without outside
…show more content…
the countries of the world would gradually become more internally peaceful through tolerance of belief or through unity in belief. In a Global system of self-determination, countries would be wary in neglecting people of other countries, because an equal reaction would likely reach them in return."
These words reflect the idea of Reciprocity, which is defined as a "mutual exchange."(1)
Reciprocity is in fact a principle of international relations. This is evident as theories like, Mutually assured destruction (M.A.D.) have become prevalent. However it is also evident that the fear of reciprocal actions, do not consistently deter States actions. Take the current condition of Russia, the Ukraine, and the West collectively. Sanctions have been the reciprocal reaction to Russia"s involvement in Crimea, and yet Russia has not backed down. Likewise in this Utopia Pro has created; reciprocity, while a vital part on IR, is not consistently effective on its own and many nations would not be deterred by the threat of retaliation or trade
Many people throughout the world have wondered what makes us us. Due to this they ask themselves questions and think about the situation. All of this relates to what is personal identity? Personal identity is the characteristics of what a human being is. Personal identity deals with philosophical questions about ourselves, for example Who am I? How do I look? When did I begin? What happens to me when I die? The argument that I will make in my paper will be that personal identity consists of three parts: body, memory, and soul. The premises for this topic are the following: the body is what we see and others see which let's us know who the person is by their body characteristics, thanks to the memories from the past it makes us have an
It merely addressed the problems within “underdeveloped” countries, without taking into account the effects that colonialism, war, and natural disasters may have had on the ‘development’ of certain nations. The idea that, “the ‘laws of development’ are supposedly the same for all , and ‘win their way through with iron necessity’,” and the emphasis on self-ambition, and self-generated consequences also demonstrate the North American interest. These concepts are very similar, if not identical, to the American idea of equal opportunity. Furthermore, they sought to define these countries by their actions and the individual mentalities of their populations rather than account for outside forces. Such carefully crafted diction, removed the United States from fault, while simultaneously justifying its hand in international
The two positions of personal identity over-time consider whether we are ‘tracking persons’ or ‘human beings’. Through analysing Locke’s account of personal identity and his definition of a ‘person’, the first side of this argument will be explained. However in opposition to Locke’s theory, the second position that considers us as ‘human beings’ will also be assessed, as advocated by animalists such as Olson. In response to this examples of cases such as amnesia will also be taken into consideration and how Parfait’s psychological continuity theory resolves prior objections to Locke’s argument made by Butler and Reid. The conclusion reached will show support towards this new Lockean theory of personal identity due to psychological
To understand Locke’s concept of personal identity it is necessary to understand what he means by identity and what he means specifically by personal identity. Locke states there are three substances that we have ideas of and that have identities. He defines idea in Essay concerning Human Understanding as “whatsoever is the object of the understanding when a man thinks” (Essay, chapter 1, section 8). That is to say that an idea, to Locke, is the basic unit of human thought. Identity is based off of comparison of these ideas in different times and places.
My identity and values have been shaped for the better by my best friend. She has shown me many things about life that have changed the way I think about the world and what I believe in. I have always believed in kindness, love, and seeing things from other people’s perspectives but she helped to bring out those qualities in me and bought out those values to their fullest.
I would describe my identity as a very unique one. For instance it was developed over years of hard-work and misfortune. Growing up in low income family I’ve learned to appreciate what comes to me when it comes to me, this has taught me to be patient and to live within my means. Growing up in a very violent and troubled part of the city meant I could not grow up normally, I was sheltered (continuously). I could not play outside or visit friends, it wasn’t until my mother became a realtor and my father gained a promotion which led to us moving away from what is now more of a slum than what it was. At the age of eight my parents divorced and as a result of this I learned to be independent and self-sufficient. I was primarily raised by very strong
I chose to interview my nephew, Jeremy for this paper. Jeremy and I are members of the same family; but, have different racial, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds. My family is a very large family and consists of; six brothers, sister in- laws, and fifteen nieces and nephews. My brother, Joe, married an African-American women (Sandra) and had two sons; but, they look nothing alike. Surprisingly, Jeremy’s appearance is African-American and Anthony looks Caucasian.
From a young age, I was taught to respect people no matter their station in life. My parents and others I was around frequently, simply did not allow for disrespect, often I was corrected swiftly but fairly. The parenting I received is a large part of the parent I am, as well as, the person I am. I maintain a happy go lucky demeanor, I suppose the nation I was raised in, and along with the fact that I have never really known violence on a day to day basis as too many others in the world are subject to allows me to seek perspective without fear of persecution or bodily harm. I have many friends from various walks of life. I have crashed on their couches and they mine, and security I find in those relationships has helped me through tough times and allowed me to feel good when I help in turn. Being an overall good person without religion being the guiding force in my life is a big part of my identity. There is no fear of “hell” or a bad scenario in the hereafter, so my attitude on life is not forced or faked. One final influence on my identity is my early adoption of technology, I have always enjoyed gadgets and computers and feel it has made me useful and I will maintain that feeling into old age as I understand tech more than most my age I’d speculate. All of this combined makes my identity, I do my best to avoid negative influences, and sometimes positive ones, in order to make up my own mind about each new scenario I am placed into.
The process of identity formation is a life-long process that will continue as an individual ages. Many aspects contribute to the formation process. Often, individuals ask themselves the question who they are. Subsequently, they tend to spend their life trying to figure that question out. Some are able to do so with such ease, others tend to take a lot more time to answer that question. The sense of identity has the purpose to aid the individual in their social-cultural environment (Kapplan & Flum, 2009).
Everybody has an identity, it makes them individual and unique, and it defines who you are as a person. This project about my identity showed me what makes me unique. I would have never known how much my friends mean to me or how my identities connect with each other. I have three identities that make me who I am, cultural, personal, and social. A specific quality that covers my cultural identity is being Czechoslovakian. Both sides of my family have at least a part of Czech in them. My great-grandparents are from Czech Republic and my grandpa was the first generation in America, he was born in Ohio. This is very important because I have always identified as Czech and it is a big part of me, as I am so interested in ancestry. For my personal identity, the biggest part is my personality, being loud and outgoing, has always been important to me. The reason being, it is how people view me. A lot of people know me as the loud person or the person who talks a lot. That is meaningful to me considering I like people to view me in a certain way The last identity, social, is one of the most important to me because it involves my friends, and through this project, I learned how vital they really are to my social identity. I realized that I have a good amount of friends in this project. It is nice to have people as a support system and to relate with. These qualities show that I value being loud and outgoing. It also says that I value my family and they are a big part of life. The last one, social, ties in with the first one because it shows I am outgoing and friendly.
There are numerous factors that either make up or restrain the self-identity of a person or an individual. Culture, in addition to family traditions, is one of the factors that affect the self-identity of an individual. When growing up, the environment around affect the personality, values, as well as, beliefs of an individual. The environment includes friends, family members, and the people that affect the life of an individual. So, if the environment is negative, then an individual will have low self esteem.
The influences that give power to people are all different. They depend on many factors
Understanding an individual’s way of life as it relates to their culture, beliefs and ethnicity. One’s personal identity is the main characteristics that make them a whole. Personal identity is the concept you develop about yourself that evolves over the course of your life. This may include aspects of your life that you have no control over, such as where you grew up or the color of your skin, as well as the choices you make in life, such as how you spend your time and what you believe. In psychology a theory of human behavior, emphasizing the drive to overcome feelings of inferiority by compensation and the need to achieve personal goals that have value for society,(Psychology,2011).
Firstly, this essay will explain what the theories of international relations are and then proceeds to give you the overview of what theoretical perspective provides the best account in international relations
Every individual has his or her own identity. People’s beliefs are shaped by the environment they grew up in, the way they were raised, and the way they were treated. In this paper I am going to discuss about my belief in regards to gender, gender roles, race, sexuality, and social class. I will also discuss about the different experiences I had encountered in life that has determined my beliefs and my values.