Self Reflection: What Kind Of Soylent Factory?

The goal of persuasive essays are to utilize certain rhetorical strategies and techniques in order to make the audience adopt their specific viewpoint over different ones. Some examples of these strategies include anecdotes, statistics, analogies, metaphors, similes, allusion, and repetition. The proper use of these techniques will make an essay easier to follow for the audience, thus making the argument more effective. Writers should also include the Aristotelian triangle of appeals, which are logos, pathos, and ethos, and use them effectively in order to persuade the audience to agree with the argument being made. Two persuasive essays that can be compared are “Terror’s Purse Strings”, by Dana Thomas, and “Sweatshop Oppression”, by Rajeev Ravisankar. These essays both address similar topics, but there are differences in how the authors approach their arguments.

This essay is a persuasive opinion essay the word choice the author uses is all to make the reader agree with him. Some examples of where word choice has a particular effect in the essay can be found throughout the essay. The first example can be found in the first paragraph in the first sentence,

When trying to fight a point the author has to be persuasive and state facts, they can’t just go off of how they feel. In Colleen Wenke’s persuasive essay, “ Too Much Pressure” she explains why cheating is a huge problem in the United States because children don’t see it as a problem. Colleen Wenke effectively displays the three main parts of a persuasive essay, which are claims, evidence, and assumptions.

The next topic the author offered for an argument is, setting your goals of what you want to gain from your audience. The first and most simple step is to change the audiences mood. If you are able to change their mood, you make them more vulnerable to your argument and more willing to listen to you. The second step winning an argument is, changing the audiences mind and opinion. An example of this from the text is, convincing the light bulb that a replacement is the best way to get some light in the room. You want to promote yourself to them instead of coming off with the impression of a rival. The last and most difficult step to winning an argument is, getting to audience to take action. In order to get the audience to do this, you must be on a more emotional and personal level. As quoted from the text, you not only need to use desire to motivate but you need to convince them that taking this action is not a big deal; something they shouldn’t sweat about. Overall, chapter was very descriptive and informing in distinguishing the difference between an argument and a fight, and how to go about winning these

The first chapter introduced the reader to the art of rhetoric. He describes how rhetoric works through real life examples. He demonstrates ways that rhetoric persuades us like, argument from strength, and seduction. He tells the reader that the sole purpose of arguing is to persuade the audience. He showed that the chief purpose of arguing is to also achieve consensus, a shared faith in a choice.

Finding an introductory paragraph that hooks the reader can be troublesome, but throughout the course, I have spent considerable time developing that technique. The body of my arguments each exhibit strong support for the thesis. In addition, my conclusions summarize the papers without restating unnecessary information. Overall, my comprehension of the basic format of an argument has proved to be a valuable asset.

The novel Thank You For Arguing written by Jay Heinrichs teaches us the persuasive tactics behind an effective argument. Heinrichs emphasizes the importance of rhetoric by adapting persuasive tools to modern day situations. A former journalist and now an advocate for rhetoric, Jay Heinrichs has aimed to restore the art of persuasion by teaching it to his audience.

An argument is a claim supported by reasons and pieces of evidence. Arguments have five primary attributes. Firstly, argumentation is a social process which involves two or more parties responding to one another’s proposal or claim. For the case of a written argument, the writer responds to the content of the essay through a critique process. The responses should not only involve restating the same claims and reasons but rather providing supportive pieces of evidence to the positions taken accordingly. Secondly, the aim of an argument is to make the audience adhere to the written critique. The objective is to influence the audience with the aim of gaining support to

Through the use of ethos, pathos, and/or logos; style, word choice, and tone; and the author's purpose are magnified through the authors use of language. As an author, the goal is not to change the reader's mind, but to help he or she see a new point of view using ethos, pathos, and/or logos; style, word choice, and tone. Through many persuasive techniques, writers bring credibility to their arguments. The beginning remarks

In this article titled “Analyzing Arguments: Those You Read and Those You Write” goes over multiple strategies and examples to help you analyze the meaning and purpose of a specific argument and how to strengthen your own.

The second thing I will be talking about today is that, do corporations have a legal right to track your car? If you think that is a purely academic question, think again. Vigilants website notes that, “DRN fuels a nation network of more than 550 affiliates,” and it also “captures data over 50 million vehicles each month.” For example, the article gives some phrases like when Crump says, “This is the same argument that the NSA made in the face of public.” Now this is a prime example of an essay that I’m writing because the language appeals to negativity in this article. Beyond just rhetorical appeals, another style choice of the author is the use of questions they had put us to thought. Well following that, in a lawsuit against the state of Utah, Digital Recognition Network and Viligant solutions are arguing that a recent Utah law banning them from using automated cameras to collect images and locations which is a violation of their own free speech rights. By using words like "one could argue" and "this is a complicated area", the author is attempting to make the reader think harder of what the critics could argue to this point in time. This language is powerful to a certain because if you guys are critics to this argumentized essay then you would agree, if not, you would think about words like one could argue. Overall, this article

H10: A student analyses and synthesises information and ideas into sustained and logical argument for a range of purposes, audiences and contexts.

Thesis Statement: Naughton’s overall goal in this article was for the audience to consider both sides of the argument and create their own belief upon the matter by using rhetorical choices such as appealing to expert opinions, statistics used in a poll, the tone and advanced diction.

Read the following short essay, and then write a 3-5 page response (12-point font, double-spaced, normal margins, no cover page, no binders). Your response should do the following three things: (1) state what the main conclusion of the essay is; (2) state what the most important premises (including sub-conclusions) are—i.e., state which premises are most important if the argument is to rationally convince its audience; (3) evaluate the quality of the argument, giving detailed reasons to justify your evaluation. For purposes of evaluation, assume that the speaker is a contemporary Canadian philosopher and the audience is a group of students in Introduction to Philosophy.

“Your assignment is to write a persuasive essay and present it to the class in a week. You will be graded based on how convincing it is. Today we will be choosing topics,” announced Mr. Bowerbank, my 7th grade English teacher and ruler of classroom 110. My class simultaneously groaned at the prospect of work. I simply lifted my head with intrigue as it was already May and about time we had our first essay. He then proceeded to give examples of topics we could choose and gave us some time to think before we had to tell him our topic. My classmates were already rushing to tell the teacher their idea lest someone else steal it. That meant the usual abortion, death penalty, or drug use topics were out. I really couldn't think of anything and the teacher was slowly making his way through the remaining students like an executioner beheading criminals in a line. I have always thought that he would make a marvelous supervillain if he had a curly mustache, a tophat, and a cape. Eventually my name was called. I slowly dragged myself over to his desk. Even sitting down, he still seemed to tower over me. “What is your topic Cindy?” As usual in such desperate times, my mind turned to food. “Waffles are better than pancakes.” I figured that a waffle was just a differently shaped pancake with a nicer texture. “Hmm. Excellent topic. I look forward to your essay!” I survived to live yet another day.