Self Reflexivity In Oral History

When preparing for an interview, a great deal of thought and consideration needs to be completed before the interview even begins. The person conducting the interview needs to think about where the interview is going to take place, the time of which it will occur at, and what kind of technology will be used. They need to review the file and consider who is being interviewed, what the person has experienced, and how they may be affected. Interviewing someone is a crucial part of policing, and ultimately helps police solve crimes. When it is done properly, it can be very successful, but if it is not done properly, it could ultimately end an investigation. Therefore, an interview can either be successful or not, and here are some points displaying the success and improvements that can be done in interviews.

how the questions are answered. Your goal in choosing an interviewee is to simulate the interaction

According to Jeff Lipschultz, “Don’t Be A Victim of Interview Bias”, he shares many circumstances about Interview Bias and how to deal with them. A bias is an opinion about whether a person or idea is outstanding or inferior, that influence decisions. The article mentions eight biases which are can direct toward interviewees. Some biases can help candidates makes a good impression on the interviewer, such as The Halo Effect Bias, Stereotyping and Generalization Bias; Also, some others can be detrimental to the candidates, such as The Contrast Bias and The Gut Feeling Bias. However, a bias can generate by candidates; for example, Nonverbal Bias. Interviewer base biases on cognitive biases that cause them to evaluate the quality of the candidate

Oral history has been a vital source of historical and important information since the beginning of human interaction. Recordings and one on one interviews with someone who lived through a certain time period or particular event can often provide a substantial amount of information and evidences on a subject that one may be researching. Unfortunately oral history does has its flaws, and it does not always provide the best source of information. Often information from direct interviews and other forms of oral history can be misinterpreted and inaccurate.

A major part of the significance of an interview lies in its ability to enable employers in using interpersonal conversations for determination of the capability and relevance of an individual candidate. A profound knowledge of the required skills and experience before the interview process prepares the recruiter to assess the candidate for relevant skills. During an interview, employers not only collect information about a potential employee but also develop an image of the candidate away from the resume. Additional information gained through the interview can effectively facilitate an employer’s selection choice. A good interview is therefore

Since I was a child, I’ve had quite the knack for rushing. I was one who could never stop, just keep going. I knew I had so much to achieve yet so little time as well as someone with a goal. However, until now I never realized how much sorrow the loss of a goal can cause. It just slips through fingers as if it was clear water. After pushing and struggling for so long, the prize was just beyond my reach. Alas, I would never reach out and grab it. The little change made such a big impact. To others the change that I’m reciting is not a very important feat, in fact it is a change many would laugh at. However, only I can see its importance, as it is I who has lost it. This all starts with a small video game that I know now made me the ambitious

How does a personal narrative affect the public’s memory of a historical event? Blackburn states a personal account of history is easier to believe, allowing a link with the public to its past (Blackburn, 39). The Dust Bowl and Marrying Out documentaries, along with McHugh’s and Frisch’s articles show the importance that sights, sounds, and personal histories play in setting the mood of a documentary or exhibit, along with why oral histories are vital in public history. In Thomas’ article, along with Gulag: Many Days, Many Lives illustrates the importance that oral histories and exhibits have in the public’s memory in a museum setting. Blackburn demonstrations how oral histories influence society to interpret a particular view of history. The overall theme presented is how oral history and its use in media can shape how the public views history. With this theme, the historian must understand how the author or director uses oral history to capture the mood of to influence emotionally their audience, how the use of oral histories can influence the public’s view, and how oral histories can be used

Oral History has gone through a complex evolution in the professionalization of history. Green and Troup articulate that from the 1960’s on, oral history became known as “unreliable and tainted by personal subjectivity.” However, at the same time, oral history saw a revival with the arrival of New History. Green and Troup articulate, “history from bellow embraced oral history as a means for rewriting history from the perspective of the marginalized or oppressed.” This opens up the discussion of individual agency. Which is more important in terms of oral histories, the agency of the subject or the interviewer?

When preparing for an interview, a great deal of thought and consideration needs to be completed before the interview even begins. The person conducting the interview needs to think about where the interview is going to take place, the time of which it will occur at, and what kind of technology will be used. They need to review the file and consider who is being interviewed, what the person has experienced, and how they may be affected. Interviewing someone is a crucial part of policing, and ultimately helps police solve crimes. When it is done properly, it can be very successful, but if it is not done properly, it could ultimately end an investigation. Therefore, an interview can either be successful or not, and here are some points displaying the success and improvements that can be done in interviews.

In her essay Katherine Borland recounts her grandmother's remembrances forty-two years after a day at the harness races that was shared with Borland in a narrative that was, according to Borland, "highly structured" and "thoroughly entertaining" (Borland, 1998, p. 320).

One of the Events/ Memory I chose was one from my Childhood. The memory I chose was when I was younger. I chose this memory because Elementary School used to be fun to me and I used to enjoy playing games with my friends. The song I chose was Party Rock Anthem. I chose this song because whenever I think of Elementary School that was the songs the kids I hung out with listened to and we all used to dance to this and stuff like that.

My first piece of advice is to stay calm and make sure you directly answer questions that you are asked. In a couple of my jobs, I have been able to be part of the interviewing side. One of the most common errors I have seen is an applicant going on tangents about topics that have nothing to do with the question.

The interviews that were successful knew what they were talking about and were not afraid to talk about their project. The students that did well you could tell they really did their project or spent a lot of time at their work. They

By interviewing someone on their personal experiences, it gives the person listening a chance to see something through another's eyes. In all reality, there is the possibility that the person might remember something wrong and after that, others may learn history wrong. Even with this, just listening to someone recollect on their past is an outstanding feeling. In a handful of documentaries, it includes people being interviewed and half of newcasts these days are the same way. I think interviews have become a major way people collect information today and has become an important part of making and reviewing

The entire interview hinges on the understanding of the world view of the individual from his own standpoint and not how he understands the world in relation to the other people in the region where he resides. This