preview

Sendjaya And Sarros Summary

Decent Essays

In the article Sendjaya and Sarros examines the foundation of servant leadership by reviewing the concepts from Greenleaf and represented by figures as Jesus Christ. The distinctive feature identified is the primary intent and self-concept of servant leadership.
The authors went on to state that research has been very limited on servant leadership until recently, for it is difficult to think of a servant who leads and a leader who serves, but it’s a theory with great future promise.
According to Greenleaf in the article, people’s needs, aspirations and interest are placed above the leaders own; for serving others is by first choice, then to lead. Their main purpose is for their followers to be transformed as healthier, wiser and autonomous …show more content…

As noted by Jesus, the term ‘servant,’ an alternative for greatness, is measured by complete commitment to serve, as demonstrated by Jesus of the washing of feet; exemplifying him as not weak, but with a strong self-image.
Sendjaya and Sarros also mentioned that even though servant leadership and charismatic leadership may share common biblical roots, there remain colossal gaps between the concepts.
As charismatic leadership has been methodically studied and developed into a tested theory, servant leadership remains a movement and an untested theory. Today, many organizational leaders see themselves as servant leaders, who lead with a servant's heart, a role model, willing to take risk, serve and promote others.
Critique
The article stated that since Greenleaf, servant leadership has been evaluated, debated, and written about as a theoretical basis of leadership, but little empirical evidence to demonstrate that it belongs among the ranks of more researched theories. It is a sustainable and relevant theory of leadership, for much of the research documented is based on emotional arguments, case studies, and

Get Access