preview

Separation Of Church And State In The Scarlet Letter By Nathaniel Hawthorne

Decent Essays

Throughout The Scarlet Letter the lack of separation of church and state, and the problems it created, really bugged me. Because the Government and church are essentially the synonymous, there is no unbiased, third party looking at the situation to assess weather there was a crime or a sin is committed, and there is a difference between the two. A crime is an action that breaks the law of the state. A sin is an act considered to be violation of divine law. A sin a crime against God, not against the people of the colony, which is a crime. It is not a crime to want the iPhone 6s, but it is sin. It becomes a crime when I try and steal my friends iPhone 6s. The problem with no separation of church and state is a sin and a crime become the same thing, with the same punishments. When the founders combine Church they think they are creating a “Utopia” (41), but they are really creating an oppressed population. The citizens of the colony are forced to wear “Sad-colored garments and grey steeple-crowned hats,” (41) and abide by the “Puritanic Code of law, which…. Administer[s] in its final and closet application to the offender” (45). The fact that civil and religious law were one and the same is the reason Hester is shamed, outcast, and deprived of love, but it also contributes to the lack of progress in the colony.
There is no …show more content…

The young children do not know how to accept because they have never been exposed to differences. The kids “had got a vague idea of something outlandish, unearthly, or at variance with ordinary fashions” (78), but they do not accept anything “outlandish” (78). They are used to their gray, drab, uniform life, and are never exposed to anything different or outside their routine. Routine is good, but people who push the boundaries push society forward. Hester pushes the society not only forward, but also horizontally – to broaden their

Get Access