preview

Serial Killers: Nature Or Nurture?

Decent Essays
Open Document

Nature versus nurture is an ongoing debate on whether people are born with a wickedness that causes them to commit crimes, or if the surrounding environment of their early life causes them to become evil. People are born with an unrighteousness that is the root of their iniquity, this natural evil comes from their genetics. Psychologists that have studied serial killers find that they often times have no vendetta, and are simply committing these acts because they have some outlandish desire to hurt others. These killers are not like a normal murderers, “serial killers are driven by the instinct from within and their desire to kill” (Fox 102). Serial killers do not commit the crimes because of the natural desire that comes from a natural flaw in the person’s genetics and chemical imbalances in the brain. The killers act solely on a natural complication within the killer’s own mind. …show more content…

Hickock’s major conflict within himself came from his desire for a physical relationship with underaged girls, a thing that Hickock knew could get him into trouble if he acted on his impulse. Hickock’s naturally occurring problems also got him into trouble when he started fraudulent checks, which landed him in prison the first time. Then, his impulse eventually lead him to take part in the murders of the Clutter family. Hickock grew up in Kansas and in school he was “an outstanding athlete” who was also a “pretty good student, too, with A marks in several subjects” according to his father (Capote 166). Hickock had a supportive family and he made the culpable decision that resulted in him going to prison and eventually his death. The natural problems that Hickock had led to his criminal offenses. Hickock had problems in his brain that could have stemmed from genetics, or just mixed up brain chemistry that would cause his criminal

Get Access