Service Animal Law Essay

Is it ethical for animals to have the same rights as humans? During this paper I will present the views of both sides. I will try my best to give the reader a chance to come to there own unbiased conclusion. I will talk about the key areas of animal ethics. I will present the facts and reasoning behind the arguments over Animal cruelty, testing, hunting, and improper housing. My conclusion will hopefully bring us closer to answering many of the question surrounding “Animal Rights and Ethics”.

In the article “No, I Do Not Want to Pet Your dog,” by Farhad Manjoo, the author deeply expresses his negative opinion towards dogs and their oblivious owners who believe that everyone's a dog lover. The overall theme of the essay illustrates the lack of responsibility for dog owners have for their pets as they run ramped through dog free zones. Manjoo deeply expresses his opinion, although lacks some key supporting points and formulates mostly upon personal bias. With that in mind, I strongly disagree with the author and believe that his main points does not accurately portray the issue related to dogs. ………..

The law now holds both the owner and landlords accountable for just the one specific breed of dog creating complications for many families and many animal shelters. Families are being torn apart under this new law causing them to have to make

With groups splintering and wanting different goals. Harrington in her article explains the ambiguity of the original law, which caused the change in definition of a service animal. The change was that service animals are now specifically working dogs that serve a specific function to its handler. Huss states that with the previous version of the law it allowed people to train horses and other animals to be service animals and to take them into public places. Thus, came the opposition that restaurant owners did not just want animals in their establishment.

In today’s evolving society, there is more mobility that ever for people with disabilities. One of the things that allows this to happen is the use of service animals. Problems however arise when people try to cheat the system. Attempts to pass off pets as service animals, improperly trained animals, and businesses with lack of knowledge on laws all contribute to ongoing frustrations. The need for a centralized training standard as well as government registration and regulation of service animals is clear and immediate. If standards can be established within breeding clubs for “Good Citizen” training, then it can be done for service dogs. Then, once

I support laws that protect people from harm and dogs which is what the BSL law is supposed to do, but the problem what the BSL is that there are no restrictions on how law enforcement is supposed deal with retrieve the animal, it targets a specific breed, it targets a specific breed and there are no restrictions on how to return a dog.

“Veterans report that service dogs help break their isolation. People will often avert their eyes when they see a wounded veteran. But when the veteran has a dog, the same people will come up and say, 'Hi' to pet the dog and then strike up a conversation.” This quote from United States Senator Al Franken is a shining example of the power that a service animal can have to improve the quality of life for those with special needs who have a service animal. Imagine!

First off, dogs and mini horses should not be the only service animals in public, because they don’t have hands. According to Monkey Helpers Tamra Orr states

Now in days anyone can buy a service vest and call there dog a service dog. Many dog owners are now discovering the option of bringing their dogs into public places without even worrying about whether their dog is welcome. This type of thing is seen all the time especially with women and small dogs being carried around in their purses. In many places such as Restaurants, hospitals, hair salons, and schools it has been noted that over the years the number of “service” dogs coming and going through there doors has increasingly gone up. Legally, there are consequences for trying to pass off a family pet as a service dog, but the legal community has found it difficult to prove which dog is a service do and which is not, due to the lack of legal registration, people are rarely being prosecuted for their offense.

The Different Kinds of Service Animals Some people think that only dogs can be service animals. “A common misperception is that only dogs can be trained to help people with a disability – and those dogs must be Golden Retrievers or a similar breed” (Turnbull). Research shows that a lot of other animals can be trained to be service animals. It is a normal conception that dogs are the only animal eligible to be a service animal but research shows other animals are capable of this.

Would you think that only dogs and miniature horses should be the only service animals allowed in public when there are tons of other service animals people can have? I don’t. I think that dogs and miniature horses should not be the only service animals allowed in public. In this article, you will find out why I think this.

The question asked is could a social contract theorist be an advocate for animal rights? According to the view of the social contrast theorist, the answer would be no. Their belief system is that animals have no rights because they can’t understand nor take part in a contract. Unfortunately, because they cannot comprehend a contract, they cannot uphold it, thus, they don’t have any moral rights. This also hold true for young children and the mentally challenged. Personally, most humans still hold a basic moral code and have a level of compassion in which they, on some level want to protect those that can’t speak for themselves. I understand the concept that the social contract theorist believe in and can understand and even agree with their

Animal rights are an important topic to discuss and review. The trouble is the vast diversity of how people see humans and animals and how they are different and yet the same. Animals are in every aspect of our lives in how they are utilized to make our lives easier, to sustain us, or as a pet. Unfortunately, the line of animals and humans blurs as the widely known belief that we are a derivation of an animal and we should treat them as we would ourselves. This viewpoint, however, can be taken to an extreme as we see pets that can be pampered quite a bit. Relating back to the four authors in our text, there is considerable controversy on how animals should be treated. While some interesting positions arise with the various authors, to

third world. Singer feels that since the people of the third world are so far

Non-human animals are given rights only because of their interactions with human beings. Without involvement with humans, animals do not deserve rights. It is through this interaction with humans that animals are even given moral consideration. We do not give rights to a rock simply because it is a creation of Mother Nature, similarly non-human animals do not have rights unless it is in regards to humans. As pointed out by Jan Narveson "morality is a sort of agreement among rational, independent, self-interested persons who have something to gain from entering into such an agreement" (192). In order to have the ability to obtain rights one must be consciously able to enter into an agreement, non-human animals are