“Real SEX” step in beyond or correcting a mistake?
The story of Unstimulated sexual scene on film history
Javaad Tare
L4 Film production
History and Culture
2500 word
January 2017
Abstract
Those are probably the questions or wonderings that surrounds almost ever teen 's day life, and also at least 90% people outside the Movie Business and Industry who just watch Movies.(not pornography) So How are sex scenes in movies shot? As an actor/actress, how is the experience?
When the sexual scene added to the films?
What the propose of using adult nature on films?
Those question and the ideology so-called unsimulated sex scene tickled my curiosity to having a look on using sexual intercourse in films in terms of making a cinema as
…show more content…
Do you think depictions of sex and nudity are important in cinematic storytelling? How have depictions of sex and nudity changed the way we make films? that would be the question I will chasing for find out in this essay.
Sexual scene in cinema history
In the first day of cinema just after the film-making stated to developing as an industry, moralists faced with to the amount of nudity, sexuality portrayed in movies in contradiction of Censorship dominated the authority to help conservative community, once moving pictures became widespread and available to big amount of viewers.
In very first day of cinema on Edison studio, lip-on-lip action “The Kiss (1896)” may was a first sex scene of a kind. How times have changed! What led the director and to broke barriers, challenged the ratings, and consequence them to further developments. I will have look on some of milestones in the depiction of sex on the big screen.
Figure 1 The Kiss(1896)
Ecstasy (1933): in The first non-pornographic movie to show the sex act Gustav Machaty’s tells a romantic drama about a really young (19-year-old Hedy Lamarr) and her impotent, wealthy elderly husband, and finds love and lust in the arms of a virile engineer. Censored for a nude bathing swim, a naked forest romp, and a love scene that depicts the
The censorship conflicts in the 1900s were extremely intriguing and intense. Around the end of the 1920s, individuals possessed immense moral shifts powered by religious groups during the Great Depression, which resulted in decisions that created a new revolution that dealt particularly with the regulation of content of films. Consequently, in 1934, at the same time that the “Golden Age of Hollywood” began, the Hollywood Production code was formally implemented. The film
Movie theaters continuously began sprouting in many towns and cities across the entire country. Hollywood in many ways was contributing to the change in gender norms that were taking place during this time. Both Women and men began to challenge these norms by the way they dressed on and off camera. Hollywood’s depiction of new styles for men and women showed ways in how to develop new styles in womanhood and manhood. Hollywood was transforming leisure during this time, but they were not the only ones to do so.
The article takes many examples from primary sources, mostly from films of the pre-Code and post-Code era. He utilizes these films to exemplify the difference in the portrayal of sexuality due to the Production Code. Secondary sources, including a book called Pre-Code Hollywood by film historian Thomas Doherty, are used to analyze pre-Code films, which did not follow political or moral patterns of the time.
This source focuses on the rise of changing sexual morals and women being a symbol of sexual activity in the new workplace, on screens (in films). One of the biggest areas of change and controversy was sexual morals. Sex outside of marriage became more common, and contraceptive advice was openly available for the first time. A big gap was developing between the attitudes of young people and their people or traditional women and flappers. The much freer sex of the 1920s horrified many older Americans. They blamed cinema for its blatant use of sex symbols such as Clara Bow.
The documentary This Film is Not Yet Rated, provides an account about the MPAA and their rating system. The film contends three main arguments against the MPAA rating's prejudice between; sex and violent content, homosexual sex and heterosexual sex, and bloody and non-bloody violence, by their use of side-by-side comparisons. A main argument in the film is how the MPAA differs in its treatment of sexual content versus violent content. The documentary contends that main difference between NC-17 and R is that R would only show missionary position sex; while other type of sexual behaviors is NC-17. Side-by-side examinations of The Cooler and Scary Movie, is used as evidence for this argument.
Ever since Thomas Edison invented the Kinetiscope in 1894, films have been reaching its way to the heart of American culture. Since the roaring twenties, where the United States began to see the first movie theaters to the 1960’s, where films are officially a source of leisure and escape from reality. Films influenced American culture between the 1920’s through 1960’s by becoming an increasingly popular form of leisure for years to come while causing scandals, riots, and movements about films or about the idea of films in general by displaying issues in society such as racism, forming a need for censorship laws. Films have also provided a fantasy world for their audiences by showing a film about someone in their perfect life using ethical
With reference to relevant cultural theories analyse the representation of sexuality in a film/television text of your choice.
So, now the question of how they could entertain without offending anyone come into play. Films from this period have been named the "Cinema of attractions" by film scholar Tom Gunning, in part, because they treat show over narrative. The popularity of film in its first decade was for some, a cause for concern. It faced challenges to produce longer pictures, which not only would advance their profitability, but also needed to be narrative, which in turn allowed films to carry ethical and good messages.
Early cinema is often referred to as a progression to narrative cinema, Tom Gunning would argue that it was not a progression but had its own purpose and coined the term The Cinema of Attractions in his essay ‘Now you see it, Now you don’t’. This is the concept that a large quantity of the first film makers produced films that were more about the spectacle, most of the films leading up to 1900 reflected the fascination with technology and how things happened rather than why. Gunning noted that there were three assumptions of film; the general ideas that people had about the timeline of film and where it would end up. There is the cinematic assumption, the idea that film was ‘restricted to the technological reproduction of theatre’ (Gunning T.1993) early cinema was primitive and only a practice for what was to come. The narrative assumption is that film is ‘only important as it is a predecessor to a more engaging and effective form of film,’ (Gunning T. 1993) this suggests that narrative cinema is the natural form of film. The final assumption is the idea that ‘cinema only truly appeared when it discovered its mission of telling stories.’ (Metz C. 1974) These assumptions all encompass the idea that narrative is the end form of film. In this essay I am going to discuss Tom Gunning’s theory of The Cinema of Attractions and the differences between them and narratively driven films.
This paper was prepared for Introduction to Film History, Module 1 Homework Assignment, taught by Professor Stephanie Sandifer.
When silent movies were beginning to be replaced by movies with sound, or ‘Talkies’, controversy began to surround Hollywood and it stars. Between Fatty Arbuckle hitting an actress at a party
The modern film industry was born around the beginning of the twentieth century. On April 23rd 1896 Thomas Edition showed the first publicly-projected motion picture at Koster and Bial's Music Hall in New York City. From there the film industry had an explosive growth rate. In fact,
The art of film made it’s way into the penetration stage around the turn of the century and remained there until
(No Intro Yet) Due to the Great Depression that started in 1929, the film going audience had considerably diminished. In order to attract individuals back into movie theatres, studios produced films with themes and subjects that had great shock-value such as; violence, prostitution, and especially homosexuality. These subjects clashed with the preaching’s of the Production Code, as well as various local and national censor boards, and are known today as “pre-code” films. Although homosexuality was still a very taboo subject for society at the time, many studios were able to get past the laissez-faire individuals in the Hays Office, and display LGBT content and characters through onscreen insinuation or suggestion (Source). One of the first and central “pre-code” movies during Hollywood’s Golden Age to feature homosexuality is Josef von Sternberg’s hit film Morocco (1930), which stars Marlene Dietrich as a sexually independent woman. Dietrich created a sensation in the film during a scene where she’s clad in a suit and kisses a woman on the lips after a nightclub performance (Source). The juxtaposition of Dietrich’s femininity and the masculine imagery typically associated with a men’s suit can be seen to sexually magnetize both genders watching the scene. John Francis Dillon’s Call Her Savage (1932) is another “pre-code” film that implicitly displays homosexuality. In the film, two characters go to a nightclub where a duo of flamboyant waiters skip around the establishment
It was not until the mid-1910’s did the film industry shift “towards a model that prized business legitimacy. This shift ultimately marginalized the woman filmmaker” (Mahar 133).