Sexual Assault Case Study Essay

evidence has been gathered, … then make a determination as to whether or not she is telling the truth. In most crimes, that's what cops do.” This provides his deeper, unfiltered thoughts on sexual violence and allow for the book to be unrefined, and in turn, more persuasive due to the emotion behind the statements. Furthermore, the excerpt provides insight on the lack of faith that individuals have when dealing with victims of sexual abuse, and on the officers reliable and trusting character. Lastly, this theme of a deeper insight is also seen on page 276, where a victim of alleged sexal violence was testifying in court; her testimony detailed how she had given her attacker sufficient signals that what he was doing was non-consensual. This testimony shows her explicit thoughts about what occurred, rather than just what the author could have interpreted; this produces an accurate account of what occurred from her perspective, and through her own words, the audience is better able to gauge her

On 07/16/15 at approximately 0438 hours, Kirkland Officers were dispatched to an Assault near Anthony’s Homeport in the 100 block of Lake Street South, Kirkland Washington. Dispatch related the female victim, KMW, DOB 08/25/74, called 911 and reported that a Hispanic male approximately 18 years of age had kicked her in the head. Officer DeAguiar arrived on scene and informed radio that the victim had been sexually assaulted by an unknown male that fled on foot. K9 Officer Hopkins responded to the scene to assist with a K9 track.

Attorneys are to represent their clients as members of a legal profession. As long as there has been an attorney-client case, there has been disputes regarding the attorney 's loyalty to their clients. Ethically, the adverse action implicates important professional values which include the obligations of legal professionals to provide services to those that need them, to become fully informed regarding legal matters to ensure competence, and to hold confidential clients ' communication. The attorney should always be truthful as well as trustworthy. According to Banks, “trust is an aspect of professionalism, and the encouragement of trust has become a fundamental characteristic in a professional relationship

Before I begin, allow me to preface this post: I'm not trying to be a hot take, nor am I trying to profit off of a sensitive topic. We don't make money off of page views and my identity is not rooted in viewership statistics. However, I feel pressed to faithfully steward this platform God gave Mitchell and I in writing, and want to share my thoughts with you in hopes to extend grace and compassion to those in need.

Sexual assault is a serious occurring situation that has been happening throughout the years. Sexual assault occurs more depending where you live. Sexual assault can lead to both physical and psychological trauma. Many of the cases end up in court but, some of the victims decide to stay quiet as well. This can lead to many different things. Sexual assault is when a person is forced to do something without willingly saying “yes” to the situation. Sexual assault is committed by a perpetrator that feels the need to be in control or feel powerful by forcing someone else to do something they don’t want to. With this paper I hope to inform the reader of the causes, effects, symptoms and the ways to help prevent this situation from happening to anyone.

An expert witness is a person who is qualified with special skills or knowledge. The role of the expert witness is to help the jury understand the evidence (Olson, 2011.) The testimony of an expert witness is important in understanding the evidence in a clearer manner, even the opinions offered by expert witnesses should be based off special knowledge, skills, experience, training, or education (Buckles, 2007.) The knowledge of an expert witness should exceed that of the average person, however he/she may offer testimony on matters outside of their field of experience, but should make it clear that the information is outside their wheelhouse (Forensic Healthcare, 2015.) Expert forensic witnesses should provide independent objective unbiased

“Acting in the best interest of the client, keeping the client properly informed, act in accordance with the client’s wishes and instructions, carrying out instructions with diligence and competence. Act impartially and offer frank, independent advice and maintaining confidentiality”. Bateman, N. (1995)

It is applied in order to inform legal specialists and the legal courts to make informed decision about matters of human behaviour. The psychologist as a specialist and expert is sometimes at odds with the exact nature and specific legalistic procedures of the courts as human behaviour is hardly an exact science and often requires the specialist skills of observation and assessment and interpretation of a human sciences specialist. In the ordinary context most psychologist acts

Taking everything into account, it can be seen, that the role of the modern expert witness has been changing rapidly over recent years with a depth of understanding and appreciation required of its legal duties. In addition, the expert can have several different roles to play during the case. These roles will often overlap in time and may

Last month I was at Penn State College for a work training. I have never been up there before and as I was taking in the scenery I was very aware of my surroundings. Especially as a young woman in an unknown area. I was calm but alert. One of the days that I was at the training was 4/20, which also happened to be a Thursday. Most of you may know that 4/20 is national pot day and Thursdays in college areas are known as “Thirsty Thursdays” where students go out and drink. As my co-worker and I went out for dinner that evening, I could not help but watch as there were college girls barely dressed and already drunk lined up for clubs and young men stood beside them in suits. I conversed with my co-worker, wondering how many unreported sexual assaults must take place at Penn State and as well as what the school’s policy might be on sexual assault. Authors

When one is allocated the title of an expert, it is essential to acknowledge what principles constitute when given such prestige. I

In the recent government announcement, there are some changes in the best interest duty. In the ‘safe harbour’ last steps, which is ‘take any other steps in the client’s best interests’. Also, there is a removal of the ‘catch-all’ provision (section 961B(2)(g)). Therefore, a responsibility on the advice provider is

As previously stated, an investigator should possess effective interpersonal skills. In particular, when interviewing a witness or a victim, it is important that investigators create a safe and comfortable environment in which the interviewee feels at liberty to share important information (Sargeant, 2016). As recent research has shown, when an investigator who lacks effective interpersonal skills interviews a witness, the witness may feel compelled to provide valuable information. This may result from the fact that the investigator may be using an antagonistic approach (Sargeant, 2016). Although such an approach might be useful when interrogating a suspect, this method of questioning is ineffective when it used to interview a witness, as it could cause the witness to become unresponsive.

He can think of many ways to get the informations that he wants to solve the cases and problems. Also, he can always guess the cause and effect of the cases after he listens to the clients immediately.

Detectives should receive special training to investigate cases because victims will not easily get away with lying. One reason to prevent victims from lying of rape is charging them, "Those who make false accusations can be charged with perverting the course of justice and wasting police time" (Weld). One country that has a great success in charging false accusers is the United Kingdom, "U.K. is the most aggressive country when it comes to prosecuting women who make false rape" (Weld). The United States should take in consideration of the way the United Kingdom prosecutes women when they make false accusations because there will be fewer who will accuse of someone they did not do. These women will know the consequences and most likely will not take the chance of