Sexual Education Is Important Today

Sexual education is a great tool that should be used within classes more often than not for many reasons. There are a shocking amount of young ones who are unaware of the harmful consequences

An alarming rate of Sexually Transmitted Infections and Pregnancy among teenagers has been an ongoing concern and could be linked to the lack of sex education in schools. Statistics show that 3 in 10 teenagers are becoming pregnant every year, and 1 in four teenagers are contracting sexually transmitted infections. There are numerous opposing views towards the teaching of comprehensive sex education in school districts. Many people are opposed to this because they believe that it encourages premarital sexual promiscuity in young adults, is destructive to religious belief, and is inappropriate and harmful. “Comprehensive Sex Education Is Inappropriate and Harmful” is and article that provides concrete evidence, for example, it states in the article that “Teens enrolled in these classes are given false information about how pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases can be avoided and may actually be encouraged to engage in activities that could lead to sexual intercourse” which is quite the contrary. My personal view is that as a nation we should be teaching students comprehensive sex education also known as abstinence plus, because it will better educate students and save money. Comprehensive sex education stresses the importance of abstinence, but also provides important information for the prevention of STI’s and unplanned pregnancies. I believe this needs to be taught in schools because I come from a school that taught abstinence only and nothing more, and the number of

What would you do if you or someone you knew found out they were pregnant or had a sexually transmitted disease because of unprotected sex? Would you only care once it’s too late? Wouldn’t you wish you could have prevented what you thought you were incapable of ever dealing with? Surprisingly to many, unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases can be preventable with the proper education. Sexual Education classes should be mandatorily taught in public schools to benefit the adolescents who are more susceptible to sexually transmitted diseases, who are sexually active, and who lack positive decision making skills.

Sexual Education suggests to deliver the knowledge, standards and procedures that allow the implementation of human rights, the satisfactory enactment in our personal lives, inspire a thoughtful change in civic values, ethical attitudes, and active oppositions which arouse the personal development and social combination of pre-teenagers and teenagers, and subsequently prevent the transmission of HIV, undesirable pregnancies, and sexual violence. In general it must breakdown all the ties between stereotypes and mythologies about sexuality.

Students can now access any site on the internet that contains adult content or pornographic materials. That is why sex education should be implemented in schools. It is better for children to be informed earlier because they will still know about it when they grow up as they will be more exposed to it through their peers and the media (Cooper, n.d.). Through sex education, young people are able to communicate, listen, negotiate with others, ask for and identify sources of help and advice when it comes to sexual relationships. Through communication teenagers more confident and know better about the consequences of having sex before marriage.

The link between his earliest, work and his latest, work is his focus on methods of mass data gathering, classification of that data, and the knowledge that classification can generate. Some advocate the perpetuation of our ignorance because they fear that science will undermine the mystical concepts that they have substituted for reality. There appear to be more persons who believe that an extension of our knowledge may contribute to the establishment of better marriages (Kinsey, Pomery and Martin). Failure to recognize these differences in the needs of the two sexes for a regular sexual outlet may be the source of a considerable amount of difficulty in marriage (Brady). Many papers included complimentary copy, ranging from interviews with ‘common people’ about their attitudes toward ‘the new sex book’ to sermons that eluded to the fact that Kinsey was the equivalent of the devil himself. Some papers argued for the merits of Kinsey on the grounds of freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Speculations on his reasoning include boredom, a desire for wider fame and renown,

The controversy surrounding sex education in schools has been talked about for many years. In this day and age, sex education in schools is not as helpful or informative due to the maturation of adolescents. Rather than scaring teenagers with sexually transmitted disease(STD) slideshow presentations, school systems should be teaching teens how to protect themselves from STDs. Health programs all around the country deprive teens of fundamental knowledge when it comes to intercourse. According to Advocates For Youth, “Just as it is important to enhance a child's physical, emotional, and cognitive growth, so it is important to lay foundations for a child's sexual growth”(Advocates For Youth). Adults who teach safe sex education have an important role in helping teens and preteens discover themselves, therefore improving these programs will be improving their growth.

Let 's talk about sex. Stances on comprehensive sexual education vary, whether it be from religious beliefs or past experiences, different views are held throughout. "It is in the interests of society in general... for every secondary school pupil to be in receipt of sexual education” (Cumper 16). The phrase ‘it’s better to be safe than sorry’ applies heavily on the topic of sex education, the idea of a pregnant and STD ridden 15 year old tends to frighten a million times more than the thought of proper contraception use and safe sexual encounters. Although the likeliness of a parent wanting their teen to engage in sex remains extremely low, most would prefer the latter. Comprehensive sexual education should be implemented in all schools

In Europe, educators contemplated bringing sex education to the classrooms as early as the late 19th century. In America, schools first began to implement sex education in the mid 1920s. In a book that talks about the social, political, and local goals of schooling, the author states, “Originally sex education was promoted in 1926 by the National Education Association’s committee on Character Education as a means of combatting the decline of the family and regulating sexual impulses for the good of society” (Moral Values and Sex Education). In other words, schools wanted to teach students how to control their sex drive, but almost increase in making families. In my opinion, I don’t think that makes much sense. Sex education is just as controversial in other countries as it is in the United States. Fascists in Italy and Germany thought Marxists were the ones that thought of this type of education. Several parents told their children they came from Santa Clause, the gooseberry tree, and even fished out of the river. Although a lot of open-minded, progressive countries thought sex was too contentious of a subject to be taught in schools, many of the citizens did not want to be the ones that had to teach their children about the birds and the bees. Joseph Zimmerman who wrote about the global history of sex education stated, “It was left to the schools and teachers to help dispel any cultural myths surrounding sex” (Zimmerman). In America, when teachers

Louisiana has one the highest rate of curable sexually transmitted diseases (STIs) such as chlamydia and gonorrhea in the US (CDC, 2017 September). STIs are the most direct determinant of PID which can lead can cause vaginal pain, ectopic pregnancy and infertility. Other effects of STIs are possible reproductive health problems, fetal problems and cancer. The cost of treating STD is about $16 billion dollars annually (Owusu-Edusei K, 2008). You, the lawmakers of Louisiana, must consider policies you may adopt to lessen theses rates. A basic solution would be to mandate a comprehensive sex education program in public schools and to allow the distribution of condoms in schools. Comprehensive sex education does not only teach about STI, pregnancy and anatomy, but also teaches about communication skills that help students understand their goals, values and options.

For many decades, sex education has remained an important class that many students across around the world are required to take. Since sex education classes were first introduced into secondary schools in the early 1900s, the government has taken steps to alter how the topic is taught. While many parents feel that teaching sex education in a classroom setting is appropriate, a large portion of America believes that parents are responsible for educating their child on the subject. The country seems to be deeply divided into two groups: those who support school-led sex education, and those who believe sex education is the responsibility of the parents. The article “Obviously, Sex Education Should Not Be Taught In Schools” by Cullen Herout presents the opinions of one parent who is against government-sanctioned sex education courses. Herout provides ample support and reason to back up his thesis, but his argument is poorly written due to its strong personal bias, unreasonable language, and lack of credible sources. *comment *another comment

Sex education also known as high quality teaching and/or learning about various sex topics relating to sex and sexual activities should be taught by schools. Schools teaching adolescents not only allow them to have a more depth understand of the topic, but allow adolescents to explore different values, aspects, and beliefs about the topic. Schools teaching sexual education allow children to learn, while gaining specific skills that are manage their own sexual health, relationships and life style. Intercourse is a natural part of life, with or with out sexual education in school individuals may engage in it. Even if an adolescent isn’t engaging in sexual behaviors, contraceptives, anatomy, and sexual topics should be discussed. Instead of children not having any knowledge of the topic and explore on their own, the school system should be responsible in making sure adolescents have a understanding of these topics. Despite sexual education being taught in our school systems, although 47% of high school students have engaged in sexual intercourse rates of sexual behavior have been slightly declining since 1991 (Dolgin, 2001). Schools teach sexual education in various ways through comprehensive which explores various topics including safe sex and contraceptives (Dolgin, 2001). Also rather than encouraging adolescents to engage in sexual behaviors schools teach abstinence which deter teens from having sex Dolgin, 2001).

There are a lot of issues when it comes to Sex Education in our education system. I thought that I was one of few that thought there was actually an issue until we had a discussion post about it earlier in the semester. Through that assignment I learned that it is definitely more controversial than I could have ever imagined, and I also learned that more people think that there is a problem than just me. After that discussion post I felt really passionately about this topic and what we are doing wrong to teach such a delicate subject to our children. I thought I was going to have trouble finding really good research and articles about the problems in sex education but I was yet again very wrong. If you think there is not a problem with sex

When hearing the term “sex education,” most will immediately think of “the talk” that parents have with children. “The talk,” a phrase widely used through everyday life, movies, television, etc. is intended by parents to inform their children of the consequences of unsafe sex and to explain how babies are made. Despite being a necessary conversation at home, this “talk” is generally vague and uninformative in comparison to classes on the subject. However, this topic causes chaos when dealing with courses in middle and high schools on it. Surprisingly, a substantial amount of adults would argue that the more you say to younger people in regards to sex, the greater the risk of them having unsafe sex at a much younger age than desired, despite proof that states otherwise. That type of mindset is primarily why a vast amount of schools in the United States rely solely on having abstinence-only sex education courses for students. I strongly believe that needs to be modified immediately. In this paper, I will argue why students in the United States need a more comprehensive sex education class in their curriculums in school for the following reasons: higher rates of pregnancy in teenagers, higher rates of contracting sexually transmitted diseases, and the negative aspects of the aftermath of teenage childbirth.

Countless avenues shape our knowledge of sex; whether its teachers, parents, media, or other sources. At some point most individuals receive an account of sex education. These lessons, connections, and knowledge we acquire impact our ideas about sex. The subject of my interview, whom we’ll refer to as Jessica, was no exception. Jessica is a 21-year-old, who grew up in a small, conservative North Carolina town. The public schools she attended taught sex education from an abstinence perspective and used scare tactics to deter the students from having sex. However, Jessica expresses that her mother had the largest impact on what she was taught about sex, she describes having a very close relationship with her mother. Jessica’s mother became a teenage mother at the age of 18, and in part she believes this influenced her mother’s teachings the most. Now a Certified Nursing Assistant for Novant Healthcare, she believes that the education received through her job further builds her knowledge of sex education and clarifies any discrepancies she once had.