Sexual and Relationship Needs between the Two Genders

Contemporary understandings of sexuality are not the same as back in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Understandings and terminology in the past hold multiple differences and similarities than our current contemporary understandings.

Human sexuality is a common phrase for all, and anything, pertaining to the feelings and behaviors of sex for the human race. Sexuality has been a topic that has been discussed and studied for as far back as 1000 years B.C. and is still being studied today. As the discussion of sexuality has progressed through history, theories have been created based on research and experiments that scholars have implemented, based on their own perceptions of human behavior. Out of the many theories that pose to explain sexual behavior, Sexuality Now explained ten that are seemed to be the most overlapped, and built off of theories. Of these theories, two that were discussed in the text were the behavioral and sociological theory. These two theories cover some of the basic ideas of what could possibly influence a person’s sexuality.

In modern society as the idea of sex and relationships becomes more liberal the purpose of sex and relationships comes under further analysis. In what is really a matter of just under a century sex before marriage has transformed from a concept that was once expected to one which is rarely practiced and as the attitude towards single mothers takes a similar U-turn we are forced to analyse the purpose of such concepts. Nowadays by many, sex is seen more and more as a leisurely activity which is in stark contrast to the idea previously held where the purpose of sex was seen as purely for reproductory purposes. It therefore raises the question of whether we should have the

The excerpt from Leslie Bell’s “Hard to Get: Twenty-Something Women and the Paradox of Sexual Freedom” explains the reality of how the expectation of sexual exploration for women in their twenties plays a reverse role on their behaviors and actually limits them. Bell thus groups female attitudes and behaviors in regards to their interaction with sexuality and relationships. She categorizes women into one of three: the sexual woman, the relational woman, and the desiring woman. Although this could result in a possible loss of individualism by grouping women and their experiences into three groups, and Bell acknowledges this, but insists that it provides an opportunity to study how women can share the same behaviors in a sexually confusing era.

Tran, Thanh. "Extended Essay: Gender Roles, Sexual Desires." Winter Term Assignment. Portland State University, 15 Jan. 2010. Web. 2 Dec. 2015.

In today’s modern society, where we may think that women no longer feel restricted towards their love life, sexuality, and relationships, it often comes as quite surprising that twenty-something, highly educated, and carefree women find themselves constrained among the rules of their sexual and relational desires. Leslie Bell’s Hard to Get: Twenty- Something Women and the Paradox of Sexual Freedom focuses on such young women who despite being taught to seek out a compassionate relationship of equals, are at the same time, being taught the discrepancy in the evolutionary psychology between men and women. This eventually leads women to “split” her desires and having to consider not only how to get what they want, but what they really want.

What motivates people to make the choices that they do make every day? Could it be religion, fear of the unknown, sickness, or do other people around them have the power to influence their decisions? This paper is about the reason why young people participate in an activity that most people in the world do, or will one day in their future possibly do. It’s the activity that has the power to bring new bundles of joy into our world every single day, Sex. Some would argue and say the action of sex is easy but the thought that goes behind the choice of doing this activity is complicated.

In 1998, David L.Weis conducted an assessment on 39 theoretical frameworks of sexuality research, including the social script that referred to Simon and Gagnon's account. Base on his findings, he presents the conceivable explanatory model of social scripts.

I totally agree with your idea while I was reading this study. I thought that the study does a tremendous job in examining the effects on self-demand/partner-withdrawal and partner-demand/self-withdrawal but I agree with what you have said that there was a large proportion of differences in the numbers of females and males in the sample size, which was 63% female and 37% male. I believed that the over sample size of female participants plays a role in skewing the results of the study. By relating to John Gottman book, "Why Marriages Succeed", the key defining statement for differences in gender are that men's and women's bodies respond differently when negative emotions become intense. For me, I think that this statement is highly reliable of representing the majority of couples because his book involves formally studying 760 number of couples as well as involving other journal articles in his book as well. Therefore, I totally agree with you that

Psychotherapist Leslie Bell’s Hard to Get: Twenty-Something Women and the Paradox of Sexual Freedom argues that young women in their twenties engage in “splitting”, a defensive process in which people dissociate their ideas into separate parts that are unequally valued (28-29). This predicament leads them to choose between two different “strategies of desire:” the “Sexual Woman” and the “Relational Woman” (29). While the Sexual Woman enjoys being promiscuous and unrestricted, the Relational Woman expresses desire for deeper emotional commitment and intimacy (30). However, young women are hindered by certain social factors that exist in today’s society. Religious and ethnic traditions, sexual

(2002) findings, Carpenter (2012) conducted a meta-analysis that included previous studies to measure a mean effect of romantic jealousy between sexes. Additionally, Carpenter (2012) wanted to examine if the effect differed across cultures. Communication and Mass Media Complete and PsychINFO was used to locate the articles in this mate-analysis. To narrow the results, Carpenter (2012) used the search word “infidelity”. In total, 172 effect sizes were coded by forced-choice measures, continues measures, student sample (students or not), region (U.S. or international), sexual orientation (gay and lesbian or heterosexual), and sample size. Studies were also coded by whether or not they used the forced-choice measures. Several statistical analysis were conducted between scenario and mediators to calculate effect sizes. Results for this meta-analysis contradicted previous findings, as they indicated that emotional infidelity is more distressful for most of the samples that responded to the force-choice questions. Whereas, samples that responded to continues questions indicated that sexual infidelity was more distressing. Furthermore, sexual infidelity was most distressing to student men in U.S, while emotional infidelity was reported to be more distressful to men in other counties. In other words, there is no significant different between men and women jealousy between sexual and emotional infidelity unless they are forced to choose one. And therefore,

Open marriages are a form of relationship first brought into the public eye by Alfred Kinsey in the 1960s. Since then, the idea of approved extra-martial affairs have become even more popular, despite the uneducated critics hollering about it being an insult to the institution of marriage, or a way to justify cheating on one’s significant other. As open marriages start to become a more feasible option for couples looking to explore their sexuality, a common question always seems to come up; this inquiry, in fact, will be the purpose of the following text. To begin, I use examples from the 2004 biographical film Kinsey, directed by Bill Condon and produced by Gail Mutrux. While integrating discussion from Tristan Taormino and her book Opening Up: A Guide to Sustaining Open Relationships, I introduce the concept of sociosexuality with the help of Lars Penke’s Sociosexual Orientation Inventory. In creating discussion with the above names, I aim to demonstrate just what does make for a successful open relationship.

The scholarly article: “Sexual Conflict in Human Mating” is an informative study on the current directions in psychological science. David M. Buss is the authors and coordinator of this study. Buss works within the Department of Psychology at the University of Texas. Buss is a credible author and psychologist that has published numerous psychology studies which have a large audience. The article was published on August 9th, 2017. The main purpose of this article is to address the psychological conflict, similarities, and characteristics of the human mind for mating or reproducing. Also, to reproduce successfully it takes cooperation from the male and female not only physically, but psychologically, despite the individual's personal sexual fate (Buss 1). There are many forms of sexual conflict ranging from sexual assault, relationships, and deception. These are sexual conflicts that we are consciously aware of. This article goes into depth providing the audience with information about sexual conflict at a psychological and biological level. Reproduction is a cooperative act because animal and human minds are wired to natural selection; the desire to pass down shared genes for the offspring’s success. Cooperation between mates can lead to conflict and decrease reproductive success.

Before analyzing the circumstances at play during the observations, it is necessary to describe how I characterized the sexuality and sexual identity of the observed couples. The sexuality of those engaging in public displays of affection was based off traits that constitute the sexual identity of the lovers. To

Throughout history there has been speculation about what influences sexuality in men and woman. Is sexual orientation biological or cultural in nature? There is a common misconception that sexual identity operate in parallel with gender roles( Sell, 2005 as cited in Wilkinson & Roys, 2005, p.65). Scholars have not came to an agreement regarding what actually comprise a person’s sexual orientation, however a sexual orientation has been deemed a cumulative experience and interaction of emotional and sexual feelings towards one or both genders (Wilkinson & Roys, 2005, p.65). The paper provides provides some clues as to what factors influence sexual orientation in men and woman.