Shakespeare's Day Analysis

It’s obvious that Shakespeare's play isn’t from our time period, especially the way they act. When we read stories we want to be able to the relate the character

In the Elizabethan era, many of the issues Shakespeare included in his plays were socially accepted by the audience. In contrast these issues are in large not accepted in today's modern society.

Many Elizabethan bedsides were haunted from “the terrors of the night”. Back then their ghosts were nothing like the pasty blobs we call ghosts now. Theirs were quite gruesome. Ghostly visitations were claimed to have been very unpleasant. Not only this, but they claimed it cast them into a state of spiritual confusion.

Shakespeare is so old-school. That is what most people think, but many do not know how some versions of Shakespeare's work can become more relevant to the audience. Each version may have their own unique way to show it can be relevant. That is great because some people may be more interested in only one version. Some people find comedy more amusing than others, while some would rather just see the original with the time period it should take place in.

While many high school students believe Shakespeare is not relevant today, I believe Shakespeare and his writings are relevant because they are a good influence and they bring people and countries closer together while expanding the reader’s vocabulary.

The article titled "Actors in Shakespeare's Day" by Stephanie Chidester says, "actors lived lives of danger and instability". Because of their career, actors didn't have good status in the past. In fact, laws were actually passed to keep people from being actors. Actors had to perform and be approved by the court to legally perform. This is very different from today. Today actors are role models, and are very famous. Actors such as Chris Evans and Robert Downey Jr. are very popular and famous. Today actors get paid very well and don't have to fight the law just to perform

As you can see, Shakespeare's world was very different from ours, but it also had some simalarities. Such as the love for entertainment. We may not be the same, but it is very important to know how it was different, whether it be to get a basic idea on what it was like back then, or if it's for an educational purpose. But, whatever you're using this information for, it is still something to give special consideration

Shakespeare's time was different then the 21st centurey in 3 ways. In there time they had a lot of laws and regulations. Such laws include the clothing laws, the poor laws, theatre laws, and social laws. We are very different in the way we treat the women in our Country then back then. They had very little time and different ways they would run the theatre then we do. Shakespeare's time is very different then the 21st sentery.

Shakespeare in the 1600's was writing for two political figures, Queen Elizabeth I and King James I. The plays for Queen Elizabeth, like A Midsummer Night's Dream, are often seen to have a happy and optimistic mood. However, those he wrote during James's reign, such as Macbeth and Hamlet, are darker and more cynical. These plays were often written to please the Monarchs and give the public a comedic relief of the circumstance around them. In the play Macbeth, the plot continuously moved along because of the main character, Macbeth, who was overzealous, paranoid, overconfident.

In forty minutes.” What does that mean? The main reason for there to be a separation from Shakespeare and our schooling systems. Shakespeare's plays are an outdated concept that most students don’t understand the language most of the time. There is no doubt that Shakespeare’s work is very important to the development to modern literature. But to make our educations better we must stop teaching the outdated concepts of shakespeare's plays. Shakespeare is the only relic from the Elizabethan era that is still in use to teach children 400 years in the future.

When examining the plays written by Shakespeare there are many instances where the common theme of marriage is shows. In the times of the 1600’s the ceremony of marriage was very common and done in a very orderly and strict fashion. In those time there was no aspects of a genuine love and heart felt marriage but instead they were seen as an agreement between the two parties. In many of the works of Shakespeare many characters deal with the issue of marriage and you begin to see the toll if had on many women involved in these types of marriages. In many different reviews, Journals and other scholarly works shows that there is proof of how the idea of women played a major role in the lives of women and how they were to be treated.

Some people take interest in learning about the past, the history and evolution of human beings. What I mean by that is, people want to see how life was before them, how did people survive without all these cool gadgets? How did people do this and that? Well, Shakespeare has got the answers. Since Shakespeare existed between the years of 1582 and 1616, it’s pretty amusing that just by reading his plays, you can kind of picture how people led their lives.

From his tragic story of Hamlet to the romantic comedy The Tempest, William Shakespeare has been capturing his audience since he started writing in the late 1500's. When Shakespeare first started writing in 1590, he began writing plays, both tragedies and comedies, then he wrote poetry called sonnets. It is said that he last thing he wrote was finished in 1613, because as people suggest, that was when he lost his sight. He died three years later in 1616. He is known around the globe for his writing style and unique plots. His plays are studied in high schools and colleges around the world. Shakespeare has made history with his literature. During the Renaissance, Shakespeare wrote in three different genres, comedy, tragedy, and poetry.

One common argument is that William Shakespeare was not a noble in his time, but rather a commoner. As a result, many “anti-Stratfordians base their argument on the impossibility of “the man from Stratford” writing the plays due to his lack of education, his anonymity and his supposed limited knowledge of the law, the battlefield, and the court” (Wheeler). The knowledge of the life of Shakespeare displayed in many of his biographies are sparse and poorly documented. Simply put, Shakespeare was simply not “important” to his immediate history, so little remains (“Shakespeare 101: A Summary of the Doubts”). As a result, many of the theorized authors of the plays were, in fact, written by well-educated and wealthy

There he began his training as “hireling”, working odds and ends jobs and taking small roles. It was as a hireling, though, that Shakespeare received his true education. He arrived in London during the reign of Elizabeth I, who had just firmly established her rule as queen by destroying the Spanish Armada. For the first time in decades the people of England felt safe and sure of their monarch, who also happened to be a lover of the arts. The London theatre scene experienced an event similar to the Golden Age of film after the end of the Great War. Instead of the rise of the silver screen, we see the beginnings of true English playwrights. Shakespeare’s arrival in London could not have been more perfectly timed. Acting troupes were frequently among the Queen’s court mingling among nobles, scholars, and poets. These interactions are evident throughout Shakespeare’s works. There is hardly one of his plays that does not revolve around court life, including The Tempest. Elizabeth even took a troupe under her own patronage (Halliday). Among these men was Robert Greene a well-bred, well-educated writer, who a young Will Shakespeare gave a run for his money. An early play of the Bard’s was brought to Greene’s attention, and he was so threatened by the blank-verse drama he said Shakespeare was “in his own conceit the only Shake-scene in a country”. Shakespeare had obviously observed and absorbed enough knowledge to challenge the university educated Greene