Sharp

LIKELY IMPACT 2 With a formal reprimand from management Rossi might get the message more clearly from management that he has to straighten up or he will lose his job. Rossi could properly receive the help he needs without affecting the work of the company and their employees. My coworkers’ morale would be boosted since they would not have to be stretched thin trying accomplishing additional work to cover for Rossi and they wouldn’t feel like Rossi was getting special treatment. All this could happen without putting myself in harm’s way and leaving the decisions in the proper hands - managements.

Given all circumstances I believe that contacting the proper authorities is the best course of action. With SFC Sharp on his way out of the unit an investigation needs to be started right away before his PCS.

You must use your professional judgement to decide whether to share or not, and what information is appropriate to share. Base your information sharing decisions considering the safety and well-being of others who may be affected by their actions. If you decide to share an information then record what you have shared, with whom and for what purpose. If you not sure of how to deal with the situation then seek advice from your supervisor or from a professional body.

If this was a social work colleague, my ethical responsibility would to be consider both parties and approach the colleague to gather information and get a better understanding of the situation. Also, it would be a good idea to check the agencies work policies just to make sure this is a violation. If it is it might be a good idea to let the supervisor of the agency know what has been happening so the supervisor is not completely

Once we determined that the data breach did not occur on our network we worked with the

The author of Proverbs confirms to "Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and do not lean on your own understanding, in all your ways acknowledge Him and He will make your paths straight" (Proverbs 3:5-6, ESV). Employee ethical concerns are to be dealt with according to internal process and procedure, such as employee and contractor agreements. First, I would find an ethics hotline for the company. These hotlines are meant to allow employees and contractors to report possible wrong business practices and discrimination. Next, I would inform my direct management of the findings. After this discussion, I would consult the appropriate legal counsel about next steps understanding that the CIO may retaliate but morally, I have to report the issue. Employees must be trained on the ethical and legal implication of falsifying information and proper way to respond to differing opinions (Kaupins & Park, 2011). As seen in Proverbs 21:6 " The getting of treasures by a lying tongue is a fleeting vapor and a snare of death" (ESV). My trust is in the Lord and He will glad my decision and protect me. A job is temporal but my faith is eternal. God will provide employment is I lose my job for reporting the issue. Additionally, he will be by my side to guide me through the legal ramification of reporting the tampering of business data and

Issue 4: Information Security officials failed to effectively trigger appropriate notifications and begin an investigation of the stolen data. The information security official’s incident report contained omissions and significant errors. This resulted in missed opportunity to re-create the contents of the laptop and external drive and to recognize the severity of the potential loss of data. The cybersecurity operations officials failed to ensure a timely investigation and notifications were made regarding the severity of the lost data (Opfer, 2006).

In this scenario, as a psychologist I face several ethical issues. According to the American Psychological Association, Ethical Principles of Psychologist and Code of Conduct there are at least six standards I have to

It is important to report issues to others as you can then ensure that you have taken the correct course of action. This person will also be able to offer support and if there was to be an investigation the other person will be able to confirm what actions you took and why.

Everyday individuals are faced with issues associated with ethical dilemmas. Ethical dilemmas involve an individual’s behavior toward a moral standard, which may have been established from previous generations and passed along. In upholding the standards taught individual may be forced to take a particular action involving a decision when a behavior is considered non-ethical is when an ethical dilemma occurs. It can become difficult at times in making the correct decisions or solutions to the situation, which is why a code of ethics is established in the workplace. The code of ethics in the

I am now reviewing the ACA Code of Ethics to find out whether I can use these guidelines to find a solution to the problem. Reading the Code of Ethics (ACA, 2005) I find the following aspects that are part of this dilemma:

The property words in the sentences “That knife is very sharp.” and “That sharp knife will likely cut that tough steak.” is ‘sharp’. Sharp plays two roles as property words. The first sentence is using the word sharp as to give context to a specific knife. As in the second sentence sharp is only acting as an assertion about the knife, an object that has already been identified. These words perform two different pragmatic tasks that all depend on the context of which they are said.

I have experienced this in the workplace and define this to be an ethical dilemma and will evaluate such situation by applying the Potter Box and Rest Four Components Model to analyze this case and contextualize how to navigate the problem if I were to re-encounter this situation again in the future.

In this paper, the topic being analyzed is the Panama Papers. The Panama Papers are being described as the biggest collection of documents ever to be leaked. This paper will discover, present, and judge the facts of what had happened and then through the Ethical

I would also report both Bob and Catherine’s practices to their supervisors because the Code of Ethics for Engineers says that I should. Section II, article 1 part of the Code of Ethics for Engineers states: “Engineers shall not aid or abet the unlawful practice of engineering by a person or firm.” And part of states that “Engineers having knowledge of any alleged violation of this code shall report thereon to appropriate professional bodies and, when relevant, also to public authorities.” Section III, article 3 states that “engineers shall avoid all conduct or practice that deceives the public,” and Part a of