Sherry Turkle

rather than, actually enjoying it. We find ourselves so engrossed with our phones that we tend

The Documented Life is an article wrote by Sherry Turkle on December 15, 2013 and published in The New York Times. In the article, she talks about how modern technology has caused us to put our lives on hold. Turkle states that people do not feel like themselves if they are not sharing their thoughts and views. The article states that technology has changed us by putting our interpersonal communications on pause. Turkle says we no longer see interruptions as a kind of disruption anymore. She adds that the most frequently heard phrase is, “wait, what?” as people fall back into missed conversions has become the new norm. Turkle also states that when people are alone or bored, they reach for a device. It has become so natural that they forget there is a time and place not to use their gadgets. Turkle suggests that there might be hope for the younger generation as they witness the price being paid by preoccupied, device carrying adults. Youngsters have come to value the device-free zones set up by parents for family conversion time.

In Turkle’s book Alone Together, she discusses how new technologies are generally damaging the teenagers. She thinks new technologies are letting teenagers lose interest and attention in many ways like over-excessive texting rather than talking on the phone or even face to face talking, being more alone in reality but talkative with Facebook friends by showing a lot of anecdotage, and talking in her keen psychoanalytically-trained psychologist’s tone. But this does not mean Sherry Turkle is absolutely right. Just like that you can’t say the viewpoints of an argument essay must be right, if there is a mount of examples. In recent years, teenagers were born and being raised in an environment of cellphones, televisions and computers. I have a

Fuller Buckminster once said “Humanity is acquiring all the right technology for all the wrong reasons.” Due to the inventions in computers and the internet, people have lost the ability to interact with one another face-to-face. In the article, “Authenticating,” Brain Christian emphasizes on how advancement in code programming has created a chat stimulated program called “Chatbots” which mimics human behavior. However, one’s attachment to these robotic humans have taken away the opportunity one has in order to have a real life conversation. Similarly, Francis Fukuyama in his article “Human Dignity,” mentions how he is concerned with what it means to be a human. He talks about Factor X which are inner traits such an emotions, and thoughts that distinguishes one person from another. Even though, technology is essential in everyday life, the misuse of it, such as constantly engaging in a conversation with a chatbot, can lead to abandoning the Factor X of humanity.

The relationship between people has been changed because of the widely using of new technology. People can easily communicate with other people by using different kinds of methods. Because of the use of those methods, people have more space with others and frequently hide part of themselves on the Internet in order to show the best of them. In the essay “Small Change: Why he Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted”, Malcolm Gladwell states that the relationship between people can be categorized by strong ties and weak ties. For example, in the past, people communicated by the method of interpersonal hierarchies, which are considered as strong ties. However, with the development of technology, social network, such as Twitter, Facebook, and Skype, which have become very popular in the world, are regarded as weak ties. Moreover, in the essay “Alone Together”, Sherry Turkle claims that people are distant with others and get lost in the virtual world through the new technology. She points out that now people communicate with others through technology instead of directing talking to real people. Furthermore, some people suppose that sociable robots as substitutes for people. Both Gladwell and Turkle agree with the idea that technology plays an important role on people’s connection. Technology only creates inauthentic relationship because it hides identity of many disorganized people.

In her essay “No Need to Call,” Sherry Turkle makes the claim that smart phones, texting in particular, are having a negative effect on the way humans interact and communicate with each other. The issue of how smart phones are changing our social behaviors is important because it can potentially impact the future of the human race. With smart phones, computers and tablets, our society is entering into uncharted territory and we cannot be certain of how the outcome will change our social interactions. Figuring out whether or not these changes are negative or positive is a pertinent topic for all people because everyone is affected by these new technologies in their everyday lives, whether they have them or not. Turkle believes that the way we are communicating through these devices is starting to develop us into humans who are too reliant on impersonal forms of communication to the point that it is changing how we interact with others.

Love can be an amazing thing and it is often said that nothing compares to the bond between a mother and her child, yet before a study called “The nature of love” which is discussed in the book “Forty studies that changed psychology: Explorations into the history psychological research,” our society had a very different understand about what caused this bond (Hock, 2013). In the book the author Roger Hock explores many different influential studies but in the section called “Discovering Love,” he takes a closer look into this study and discusses its importance (Hock, 2013). The influence of this study can be found in many different types of literature such as contemporary articles like “Building your own family,” which was published in Scientific American Mind (2014). This article implicitly provides further understand of the “The nature of love” study results and shows active efforts to continue building on the original theoretical ideas in order to change our views about human development (Jacobson, 2014). Even in modern text books like Psychology: Eighth Edition, can we find traces of the importance of this study. Thus this study not only provided a tremendous contribution to the field of Psychology but also changed society by altering its views on child rearing all together.

The advancement in technology have changed how people interact with one another. The era of technology is taking away social life since people prefer to have a phone in their hands than to communicate with another person face to face. However, the smartphone helps people to interact with other people who are far away from their countries. In “ No Need to Call.” by Sherry Turkle, she is a teacher for the program in saience technology, and society at MIT initiative on technology and self.

Many people view the internet as an ultimate resource for anything they desire. The people who say that the internet is a brilliant invention for the best have reasons backing up their idea. For example, Sherry Turkle writes about such ideas explaining how the internet is an excellent tool for the better in her essay, “Can You Hear Me Now?” Turkle believes strongly that the invention of the internet is an innovation for the better and emphasizes to her readers how important it is in everyone’s lives nowadays. On the other hand, some believe exactly the opposite of Turkle’s invalid inquisition that the internet is a tool that is most definitely not for the greater good. The internet is a

The “connectivity” of the world today seems like it is straying further and further from what was once thought as “connectivity.” In Sherry Turkle’s essay Alone together, she discusses how technology is becoming more and more powerful and tries to dispute the fact that if humans are still linked with each other on the same level we once were. Turkle discusses this point rather well when she states, “our networked life allows us to hide from each other,” (263). Also, Turkle discusses in her essay how robots are becoming more and more integrated in the world we live in; and, these robots are essentially taking the place of humans in some situations making us less connected with each other. While in “In the Forest of Gombe,” the author Jane

People now prefer to text one another than to call or meet. The reason for this is that technology allows us to fulfill our desire for communication with one another much faster, easier and with fewer consequences. This is why, with the further advancement of technology, connections with inanimate objects that acquired human traits are becoming more popular. This can be seen in Turkle’s essay when she first introduced ELIZA, the program that engages in dialogue. she says “ People used the program as a projective screen on which to express themselves. Yes, I thought, they engaged in a personal conversation with ELIZA, but in a spirit of ‘as if’” (458). It is easier for people to have conversations that they are able to control and achieve desired outcomes without dealing with real human emotions that can be daunting. People can experience the little moments of “positivity resonance” through artificial intelligence much easier, faster and at their

In fact, she mentioned,it’s leaving us less human. Turkle has spent years researching the ways technology changes people, and has written a book entitled ‘’Alone Together,’’ in which she describes the disturbing trends.Technology appeals to us where we are most vulnerable.People are lonely but afraid of intimacy. And so from social networks to social robots, people are designing technologies that will give the illusion of companionship without demand of friendship.According to the a psychiatrist-Carl Jung, The founder of Analytical psychology,’’loneliness do not comes from having no people about one, but from being unable to communicate the things that seemed important to

Love is a complex emotion. It has various interpretations depending on individuals. Some might see love as a virtue that brings people together while others might see love as a notion that is more mystical and unworldly. While Hannah Ardent’s interpretation of love is of a passion without any reason, I want to look at love as a passion with a reason. Due to passion, there are times when love makes the use of enhancement technologies attractive or merely just acceptable. However, sometimes justifying the use of enhancement technologies might just pollute love by making it inauthentic, selfish and a form of sloth.

In our society today a person can often look around a room of people and see nothing but the top of their heads, along with their eyes staring down at lit up screen filled with tremendous possibilities. One thing you doubtfully will view is everyone surrounding talking to each other making kinship with in their proximity. Instead, making connections through their phones. In the article written by Nancy Jo Sales “Tinder and the Dawn of the“Dating Apocalypse””, Sales speaks of the dating culture of the current twenty-first century and her views on how online dating has affected thus creating a sort of “Dating Apocalypse”. In the culture of intimacy may it be consciously or subconsciously people are seeking love and security in their lives through hookups and technological dating cites such as Tinder.

Fall in love and meet the love of your life, discuss thirty-six questions with a stranger and experience true love. Scientists, psychologists, and researchers continue searching for ways to provide answers to love. Helen Fisher, Alexandra Redcay, and Mandy Catron each attempt to dissect love, however, at the end of each seminar, they leave us with the same unanswered questions. How is love conceived, why do people fall in love, what makes people fall in love, why do we choose to fall in love with one person over another, why do we endure heartache, and what makes one relationship last over others? None of the speakers is able to communicate answers to the quest for love, instead, they depart to us the magic and possibilities that exists but cannot be defined.