Shifting Health Care Case Study

An employee can help reduce the cost of health cost by doing several things. There has been an outcry from organizations due to the rising number of competitors with high expenses catering for health benefits during employment periods and on retiring. The employee can be of great help by being participative in the programs set by their employers to benefit more from other advantages far from health costs (Kerzner, 2013). Some of the choices an employee may consider to help control health costs are by boosting consumerism, use technology to manage benefits, and indulge in fitness and health programs.

Healthcare system are employee sponsored insurance is not portable, overworked interns, residents, and nurses causing fatigue and burn out, and cost. Once an employee is no longer employed at an establishment he or she loses all health care benefits. This is such a disservice since the employee has paid into benefits and no longer has coverage (Goodman, 2016). Once the employee finds employee there is a period in which they are uninsured until benefits kick in. If anything happens during this time it is an out of pocket expense. Many healthcare workers are overworked causing fatigue and burn out. More staff could help relieve this problem. Lastly, the cost of healthcare is very expensive. In fact in the U.S. we pay more for healthcare than any other modern society. If we do not find solutions spiraling cost will bankrupt companies and force individuals to drop coverage, destroy long term viability of Medicare and Medicaid (Goodman,

The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) agrees that the cost of health insurance is a high ranking concern for business owners. Every year, they conduct a study to see what the top general concerns facing small business owners. From the beginning of the fiscal year of 1986 to the present, every year has concluded that the cost of health insurance is the top burden facing small business owners in America. (Wade, Holly Pg 24, table 5). Another important factor to consider are lost capacity due to employee illnesses or unemployment. Brad Plumer of the Washington post recently did an interesting study to determine the amount of money lost due to inactivity at the workplace. Including businesses in both the public and private sectors, Plumer estimates that over $1.8 trillion dollars per year in lost productivity at the workplace. While the Post acknowledged the idea of lost productivity is not a clear science and can be overvalued this is nonetheless a huge amount of money wasted each year.

Rising health insurance premiums have made healthcare unaffordable in the United States. Health insurance premiums in this country have undergone a steady rise over the past few years while incomes have remained the same. More than 50% of individuals with low incomes holding private insurance in the United States are unable to afford their healthcare costs (Collins, Gunja, Doty & Buetel, 2015). In addition, costs related to healthcare are equally unaffordable to 25% of working-age individuals who hold private health insurance policies (Collins et al., 2015). According to the Kaiser Family Foundation/Health Research and Educational Trust (Kaiser/HRET) survey on employer health benefits, employer-sponsored health insurance plans have also had moderate rises in premiums in 2013 for both individuals and family coverage (Claxton et al., 2013). While

There have been many studies performed focusing on the rising costs of health care and some of the findings state that the rising cost of healthcare premiums is a worldwide problem. However, I believe they are higher in the U.S. In 2015, U.S. health care costs were $3.2 trillion. That makes healthcare one of the largest U.S. industries, equaling 17.8 % of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in comparison to the late 1960s; where healthcare costs were only $27 billion, or 5% of the GDP, which averaged $9,990 per person each year. The main reason for the rising cost of healthcare is a combination of government policies and lifestyles changes. Examples included lack of coverage or costly coverage, lack of available coverage for

What’s next? Some experts say that if the consumer-directed approach doesn’t succeed, em wash their hands of health care altogether. A recent study by the Employee Benefit Researc showed that the proportion of U.S. residents covered by employment-based health benefits d percent in 2000 to 60 percent in 2004. Decades from now, observers may conclude that a counter- revolution in employer coverage began in these early years of the 21st century. —Terence F. Shea

The cost of health insurance has changed drastically over the years as it has become more expensive. Depending on personal characteristic, the cost of health insurance may vary. For instance, as individuals grow older the more expensive it becomes. In this case, health insurance is more costly because “older individuals require more health care” therefore “the cost of providing health care is rising” (Madura &Atlantic, 2012). Not only does this affect the high cost of health insurance, but the number of individuals uninsured. As stated by Madura and Atlantic (2012), “about one in every five workers is uninsured” and has increased since then because health insurance has become unaffordable. As a result, individuals tend to seek health care elsewhere as they can no longer

In 1954, Congress passed legislation allowing employers to provide health insurance benefits to employees on a tax-free basis (Sih and Singh 99). This legal provision marked the beginning of the rapidly expanding health care costs still apparent today due to the major incentives provided by the government to obtain employer-based health coverage. The overwhelming popularity of employer-based health insurance has led to a serious market inefficiency resulting from the system of third-party payment. As individuals rely on their insurance companies to pay for their medical expenses, this provides

Decrease in funding is another economic challenge in health care. The amount of finances coming from various sources not just the

One of the biggest problems small employers face today is the steadily rising costs of health coverage for its employees. This paper covers how health care premiums have risen in double digits for the past five consecutive years, how many small businesses are forced to drop health care coverage for their employees because of the out of control costs, and what small businesses are doing to control the costs and still offer health care coverage to their employees.

The probable impact of the Cadillac tax is causing employers to reassess the health care plans they offer their employees and reconsider their role in providing health care benefits to their employees in the future. Currently, this excise tax is proving to be a catalyst for change. However, regional differences in the cost of healthcare and unrelenting medical inflation is going to make the ability for employers to continually reduce benefit costs in an attempt to avoid the tax extremely

The expenses for managers will keep on rising, the quantity of uninsured individuals will likewise keep on increasing with an augmenting gap between what can be afforded and what is accessible. The rate of the uninsured will reach out into the present working class. These disappointed people, and their managers, may vote in favor of an adjustment in the health care

Many employees must designate a health plan through their employer. These days, as HMOs (health maintenance organizations) and managed care plans continue to proliferate, that means a choice between bad and worse. As employees line up in the lunch-room for a process called open enrollment, they may be surprised to learn that managed care rates have gone up — again. The mirage that managed care is cheaper care is finally fading. And, for the first time in years, employees may also have the promise of free choice in medicine in the form of a new method of financing health care. Consumers are already aware of horror stories involving HMOs, but cheap rates persuaded many that managed care is less expensive. Recent

America has a bleak outlook towards the costs associated with employee turnover, productivity decline, and increased employee healthcare costs due to chronic health care conditions. The cost of healthcare is increasing, and employers typically bear the brunt of these costs. Employers also face financial loss in regards to productivity decline and retention. In a Rand report, commissioned by the U.S. Government and compiled, by Matke and others, showed that the cumulative losses of all three domains associated with chronic

Changes in organization can make conflicts to emerge. However, in occasions changes are necessary to produce better outcomes within the organization. Depending on the changes the organization makes, HR directors and Union managers must be aware that their decision can make several employees to no agree with them. This paper will discuss the satisfiers and disatisfiers present during the process of changing the health insurance. Moreover, it will determine what influenced the manager decision. Furthermore, it will discuss whether striking is a viable option to have a better decision on the health insurance issue or if there is another job action that the organization can take. Lastly, the author will give an opinion and determining the best option to make an organizational change.