Short Run Responses And Long Term Strategies

The purpose of this reflective paper is to show my understanding along with what I have learned about HRM (human resources management) and the different way HRM impacts the success behind every business, along with the rules and regulations that go with it. Over the last five weeks I have learned quite a bit about HRM and will reflect on that throughout this paper. “Human resource management is the managing of human skills and talents to make sure they are used effectively and in alignment with an organizations goals.” (Youssef, 2012). I will be including the things I learned throughout the last five weeks in this

The role of a Human Resource department is ever changing in today’s volatile business environment. Over the years HR have become strong strategic partners within an organization by providing functions such as recruitment,

Human Resources Management (HRM) has many applications in the business world. This paper will identify three key lessons learned about HRM. It will also outline how these concepts can be applied in the real world to enhance professional effectiveness. This paper will then tie together how these lessons relate to effective HRM concepts, practices and systems. Lastly, this paper will outline specific thinking and behavior changes as well as actions that will lead to successful implementation of these key lessons learned into daily management practices.

Today 's fast-paced, competitive business environment has resulted in "rediscovery" of the human resource management function as a group that may be able to enhance firm competitiveness and performance by being "strategic" (Dyer & Kochan, 1995; Ulrich, 1997). Strategic Human Resource Management is a term describing an integrated approach to the development of Human Resource Strategy that will enable the organization to achieve its goals (Armstrong, 2005). Whiles strategy is an action that managers take to attain one or more of the organization’s goals. Strategy presents a general direction set for the company and its various components to achieve a desired state in the future. This results from the detailed

Wright and McMahan (1994) define strategic HRM as “the pattern of planned Human Resource deployments and activities intended to enable the organisation to achieve its goals.” A HR function should impact the success of an organisation; a policy must remain current and suitable to both the internal and external environment. Ulrich and Lake (1990) affirm, ‘HRM systems can be the source of organisational capabilities that allow organisations to learn and capitalise on new opportunities.’

In an era of increasing competitiveness, globalization, economic rationalization, deregulation, technological revolution and changing workforce there is an ever-increasing need for human resource management to be able to capitalize on the special challenges that this changing environment brings. For a company to be able to successfully keep ahead of the competition, human resource management is seen to be a significant contributor.

Abstract: Human Resource Management is fast gaining popularity and its importance is becoming unavoidable, this is due to the fact that Human Resource Management plays a huge role in the growth of any company irrespective of its size. Unfortunately it is yet to achieve global standards or strategy of operation; this can be attributed to the various differences between environmental factors, employment attitudes, cultural

Prior to the elaboration of the Thesis topic, it is necessary to explain the Human Resources Management is. There is no common definition by scholars, therefore we are not providing one single definition, but we will rely on the book of Torrington et al. on his explanation of the term Human Resources Management. According to them, this divergence is due to the fact that HR is commonly used in two ways. On the one hand HR is used to describe the body of management activities covered in books such as this. In this way HRM is really no more than a more modern and supposedly imposing name for what was long labelled ‘personnel management. (Torrington et al. 2011). On the other hand the term denotes a particular approach to the management of people which is clearly distinct from ‘personnel management’. Used in this way HRM signifies more than an updating of the label; it also suggests a distinctive

In the fact of the intensely transitional business in the globe today, one of the challenges faced by the managers to maintain the competitive advantage is human resources. In others words, the globalisation, technology, and the economic integration of developed as well as emerging markets raise particular convenience and problems relating to human resources. To be more specific, on the one hand, the practice that the work force, the most valuable asset of any organisations (Cascio, Wayne F, 1991; Flamholtz, Eric, 1991), nowadays seem to be increasingly educated helps the employers make their best recruitment and guarantee the “sustainable cogwheel” (Glen Hashmi, Z., and Katrin Muff, 2014). However, in others hand, the well-informed and multinational human resources relating to the employees’ differing needs and expectations, compensation treatment, working environment, or corporate culture are also critical issues that required to be under control. This essay aims to define and analyse respectively three current and potential substantial challenges that HR managers cope with in meeting the miscellaneous requirements of the contemporary workforce including (key words) strategic partners, administrative experts, and employee champion.

In some firms, due to their size, a human resource department may not even exist leading to significant issues both from a business and employee development standpoint. The following paper will explore and discuss human resource issues within the United Kingdom along with what has been done to rectify the problems.

In this changing world, our global business theories and literature have implications toward the future. The future of this growth and success depends largely on the key component which is Human Resource Management. So, we as researchers hope to enlighten and inform you as employers the significance of an effective solution that both understands your employees and is beneficial to your company. That is why we offer our recommendations in the end of this article based on our findings.

Guest (1987) and Storey (1992) in their definitions of soft and hard models of HRM view the key distinction as being whether the emphasis is placed on the human or the resource. Soft HRM is associated with the human relations movement, the utilization of individual talents, and McGregor's (1960) Theory Y perspective on individuals (developmental humanism). This has been equated with the concept of a 'high commitment work system' (Walton 1985b), 'which is aimed at eliciting a commitment so that behaviour is primarily self-regulated rather than controlled by sanctions and pressures external to the individual and relations within the organization are based on high levels of trust' (Wood 1996: 41). Soft HRM is also associated with the goals of flexibility and adaptability (which themselves are problematic concepts, as we shall see in more detail later), and implies that communication plays a central role in management (Storey and Sisson 1993).

Human Resource Management has been changing for several years. The move from "personnel" to "human resources," for example, was part of the movement to acknowledge the value of employees as an organizational resource, and was an attempt to remove some of the stigma that was coming to be associated with slow, bureaucratic personnel departments” (May, 1998, para. 2). With this change, HR took on a strategic role by providing business decisions that would bring employees to the forefront. Strategic HR focuses on both the internal and external relationships versus just the employee relationships found under the traditional function. This allows for them to have an understanding of the factors that affect employees, allowing analyzing of personnel rather than solely the relationships providing a systematic approach at all levels rather than just at the lowest (Rao, 2012).

As the world is turning out to be more aggressive and unstable than any other time in recent memory, producing based enterprises are looking to increase upper hand at all cost and are swinging to more inventive sources through HRM practices (Sparrow, Schuler, & Jackson, 1994). HR practices has been defined by (Smallbusiness.chron.com, 2016) as “the means through which your human resources personnel can develop the leadership of your staff.”

Within this essay an in depth analysis will be conducted on the difference between Human Resource Management and Strategic Human Resource Management using contemporary perspectives. Human Resource Management (HRM) is the process of managing human resources in a systematic way. It is a practice devised to maximise the performance of employees and is concerned with the application of management principles to manage organisational personnel while paying attention to the policies and systems of the entity (Delaney & Huselid, 1996). Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) is a function of management which entails development of policies, programmes and practices related to human resources, which are aligned with business strategy so as to achieve the strategic objectives of the organisation (Patrick M. Wright, 1992). Its primary purpose is to improve the performance of the business and maintain a culture that encourages innovation and works continuously to gain competitive advantage. In this essay the Resource-Based View, High Performance Management and High Commitment Management perspectives of Strategic Human Resource Management and Traditional and Collaborative