Short Story Of Dome Gaetano

Both of these endings work well in their respective mediums. There is no written law that says a producer or director has to strictly reinforce all the themes of the novel that are being adapted to the screen. If this were true that would make for an entirely dull piece of work, which brings me to the Michael Winner version.

Though it was unfortunate to have such an intelligent man like Morrie to pass away due to a deadly disease in the end, I still think the ending was appropriate and satisfying. Morrie was glad to spend his hardest time with the author and we can see the author was changing bit by bit afterwards. He finds the true meaning of life and learns to love, cherish and appreciate. ‘Love wins. Love always wins.’ as quoted by Morrie. Morrie changes the author's perception of life, as well as the

At the beginning, the book made me sad because of the time of when this took place. It was very hard times for the people

I disliked the ending because I don’t think it was right to end the story with the village about to stone Tessie to death. Instead, the story should’ve ended with Tessie being stoned to death, but then the village finally realized the damage and chaos the “lottery” has done and then have decided to stoned Mr. Summers to death for starting this monstrosity. If the story would’ve ended the way I wanted it to, this would’ve been a great example that the world can use when it comes to blindly following traditions without actually thinking if the tradition made sense or not and then realizing the truth of the traditions in the world we have now. I believe this would have made a bigger impact to the story and no more people have to end their lives

With that in mind no matter how I look at it I wish the book would have started in a more interesting manner. It was very hard to start the book simply because it sounded like a regular high school life. Maybe that makes it a more interesting read to put in the realism, and yes I do understand that the book needs to start somewhere; to me it was just a bad start and could have been executed better. Now some people will probably say that it was a better start then how some books start and I definitely agree on that. To me I just wish that the book would have distinguished itself a bit

The only downside to this novel is that I wasn’t particularly into the exposition. The first couple pages didn’t interest me to the point where I would not want to stop reading the book. However, the climax did change the

This ending also reinforces the message by making it something that you remember and can’t stop thinking about. Another perk of using it is that it closes things off but isn't unbelievable. In order to understand why the author chose this ending, it may help to look at what other endings there could have been and why he didn't choose them. This ending sends a much darker message than it would have without it. If the book ended with a happy ending I feel it would feel depressing.

I found this novel to be was just as enjoyable, if not more, than the first. Even though things began to become too convenient near the end, this

There is one word to describe this final passage; closure. This passage sums up the entire book, wraps it in pretty paper and places it under our Christmas trees, or dishes it out on our birthdays for our nonreligious folks. The fact that this excerpt is not the final lines of KING OF ITHAKA is the ribbon on to of our perfectly packages parcels. All to many times have I read books for school, claiming to be phenomenal pieces of literature and been disappointed upon reading the ending. Although you find a gem like this ending at times, nearly every book that I have been required to read ended in a rushed, unpolished ending that I was dissatisfied with because it provided no crumb of closure. Whenever I read a novel, I see it as a serious commitment. Therefore, when I start a novel,with a horrible ending, like I do so often, I feel cheated. I applaud Tracy Barrett for the ending of her book. The ending to King OF Ithaka is

In the novel “After The First Death” the ending is tragic and unfair.There are three things i would change about the ending.Artkin could have stayed alive and kate could have died. Inner delta catches artkin and miro and tortures them both till they give information about their terrorist group.inner delta invades the camp where they grew up.The book says that kate doesn't die until miro kills her and that is his first kill i would make it so miro does not get the chance to kill anyone.

No, the ending of the book Hush, was not satisfying to me. I think this because how they ended the book was awful. What happened was, the main character Evie went to the hospital to see her father who had almost killed himself. The father and daughter were once again, starting to love each other. Then, Evie asks her father if she could tell him the story of how he became a cop. Then he starts off on how he met Officer Denis and Officer Randall. I thought this ending was very bad because, I feel the author could of ended the book better. Now, how I would change the ending of my book is I would have Evie tell her family that she is on the track team and her going to a Track championship and winning it. Then having the family go back to their

I have finally finished my book, and I have to say, I really did like it. Was it my favorite book ever? No, but I thought the plot was well thought out and the book was well-written as a whole. I have to say, I was happier with the novel when I wrote the first blog post because my main complaint is the ending. It is not only really sad, but it also doesn’t seem to connect with the other parts of the story. I thought one of the morals was to learn to tough out hardships and conflicts, yet the main two characters decide to escape the world they live in altogether and choose to just bounce around with nothing to fear. Also, after the first half, the perspective began to shift. It used to be third person omniscient and mainly followed Ender,

The ending of the book was a bit surprising, but in almost all the books I end up reading someone dies at the end of it. I liked how the author connected the end of the book with the beging with the symbolism of flight. The ending was a little abrupt with not a lot of closure, but I like book like that if they are written correctly and this one was.

In the distance, a ferry boat honks its half hearted fog horns. The horn sounds are mostly covered by the loud hustle and commotion of La Rive Gauche. Harper Timothy Wells has finally arrived. La Rive Gauche, roughly translated to The Left Bank, is bustling through and through with highly respected intellectuals and the creatives. Harper frantically scans the french style villa grounds, only thinking about his mother’s words before he left London: “ My boy, please arrive safely and look out for your mentor, he should help you find work and a good home, be cautious.” The number on his crumpled manilla envelope is smudged by palm sweat. This three digit number, written in black bleeding ink, is his ticket to his future. Harper sees the correct house just a short distance away. The only thing in his way; the swarms of people lined up for the breakfast cafes that line the streets. Cafes such as Cafe le Dome, la Closerie des Lilas, la Rontonde, le Select, and La Couple are some of the hot spots in the early morning. Here many people take a quick break to have a warm cup of espresso and indulge in the scent of a freshly baked croissant or deep fried beignet while listening to the French and Latin language flow about them. It is in these cafes, that Harper imagines himself bantering back and forth with his executives.

I thought the ending was trying to portray how things were going to be turned around and that the family was going to work together. Having said this, I think the ending that the director said he was going to leave