At the end of the 19th Century, the U.S. made legal history when the world's first juvenile court opened in Chicago(Horwitz-Prisco). The court was founded on two basic principles. First, juveniles lacked the maturity to take responsibility for their actions the way adults could. Second, because their character was not yet fully developed, they could be rehabilitated more successfully than adult criminals. More than a century later, these principles remain the benchmarks of juvenile justice in the United States(Horowitz-Prisco).In recent years, however, a growing number of juvenile criminals are being tried as adults. In part this stems from public outrage against children who are committing violent crimes. Many young children in America are
Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults? Violent crimes are committed in the United States everyday. Almost one-half of them are committed by teenagers ages 13 through 17 ("End of Line" 484). After the crimes have been committed and the lives of these children have been radically changed, society often demands that those who commit violent crimes be tried as adults, rather than as adolescents. Juveniles should be given light sentences and a second chance to return to the streets. Trying these teens as adults unjust and unfair, there other alternatives that our society can turn to, to help make our communities better places to live. We need to realize that children are our future, and we
Many young children in United States are imperiled by abuse, domestic and community violence, and poverty. Without help, these children suffer, struggle, and fall into despair and hopelessness. Usually minors cannot manage emotional, social, and psychological challenges of adolescence and eventually engage in destructive and violent behavior. Today, juveniles are lucky enough that death penalty was abolished and said to be and cruel and unusual punishment by the Supreme Court. However, juveniles who commit murder can be put in a prison for life without a possibility of a parole.
Juveniles should be tried as adults no matter the crime. Should juveniles be tried as adults is a question asked by most people, Being a juvenile is referring to someone who is young. Juveniles should be tried as adults because they want to act like they know everything, juveniles should be able to know what is right and what is wrong, juveniles should be able to make wise decisions and juveniles should not be tried as adults because they have a whole child hood ahead of them.
In the light of extreme juvenile cases, the juvenile system has conceded age exceptions, by allowing juveniles that commit heinous crimes to be divided into a system where they aren’t tried as an adult based on the fact that they’re only kids. If the belief that they are only kids, shouldn’t they learn that when their kids, the actions they commit have consequences. Although it’s understandable if the juvenile system argues, that for many kids, their parents play a huge part on their developments, but in the case that there is parental neglect, and they don’t know the consequences of their actions, then they shouldn’t be tried as an adult, largely based on the fact that they don’t have parents to teach them values, and the result is that their brains are incapable of knowing the capacities of their actions. If this is the result, then the reasons to not tried them as an adult, is correct, but the reasons to
killer. Some people may agree with her, but the truth is that the teenage brain is too complex for anyone to understand. The teen years are difficult to get through, which explains all these suicides we hear about in the news. If the kid who killed Jenkins’ family members would have gotten the proper help, her family members might have still be alive and the kid would been free from prison.
Should Juveniles Age 16 be tried for murder as an adult? In the United States it is popular for many juveniles, mostly around the age of 16 to be tried as an adult for murder. Two assumptions that make this easier for juvenile to be tried as adults, are because they will receive sentences in the adult criminal system. This will make their punishment for crime much harsher and more "proportional" to the crime committed.
Kids should be subjected to the measures of punishment that our judicial system is giving to them. Kids who show lots of enmity should be tried as adults. It is the only way to protect the innocent children. These kids know right from wrong, but they choose to do the wrong things and violence is wrong. As the laws have gotten stricter on discipline the kids have gotten wilder. When we let society tell us how to discipline our children then violent children is the result.
Criminals under the age of eighteen are committing heinous crimes. Charging them as a minor because of their age does not ensure that they won’t commit the crime again. If they are tried as adults, because they should know better, the crime rates will be reduced. Juveniles should be tried as adults for serious crimes because it enforces discipline, prevents crime, and emotionally helps the victims families.
Just imagine if your child was charged as an adult and sent to prison or jail for 40 years over accidently giving a friend a small paper cut. How would you feel? Wouldn’t you want justice in your child’s safe? Well...
You did the crime, now you have to do the time. Children all over the world ranging from ages 12-17 who have committed a crime, are all being discussed in the court of law. Should they be tried as adults, or should the court give them leniency and let them serve a shorter sentence with less punishment. Minors should not be tried as adults because of their unstable emotions and their lack of ability to comprehend the difference between right and wrong.
Crimes are most associated with adults. Murder is especially most associated with adults. When a teenager commits such a crime such as murder they must be tried, and they should not be treated with leniency and coddling, but with the full force of the law as an adult.
As more minors are committing violent crimes, the question of whether they should be tried as adults has arisen. Children as young as 13 or 14 are committing violent crimes such as murder, rape, and armed robbery. Some of these children are being tried as adults while others are being tried as juveniles and receiving milder punishments. A juvenile offender may receive a few years in a juvenile detention facility and possibly probation following his release at age eighteen. An adult committing the same violent crime will receive a much harsher penalty, often years in jail, possibly a life sentence, with little or no chance of parole. The only difference between the two offenders is the age at which they committed the crime. Juveniles over
Heinous crimes are committed every day in the United States. Each year thousands of juveniles under the age of 18 are arrested. The debate of “should a juvenile be tried as an adult” is one of the ages. Many would like to argue against the idea as they believe firmly in rehabilitation. But what happens when the crimes are so violent the family is unable to recognize the victim, or when the juvenile shows no remorse and then goes on to harm others. At what age should one be held accountable for their actions? At what age is a person taught right from wrong? A juvenile is someone in many states age 18 and under, but here in the state of Texas a juvenile is consider 17 & under. The people who agree that juveniles should be sentenced or tried as adults are the families of the victims, and the majority who acknowledge an adolescent should know right from wrong. Juveniles who commit violent crimes should be tried as adults as they are old enough to know the difference between right and wrong.