Should America Use The Metric System

The United States has to reconfigure the measurement of goods due to not using the metric system.

The metric system is used across the world, all except for the United States of America and two other countries. The United States of America currently uses the Imperial system instead of the metric system despite the rest of the world using it. Why would The United States of America not use the metric system even though there are so many benefits to it? Switching to metric can mean more business opportunities for America from other countries. The metric system can be the link for fashion designers to have more opportunities in other countries, or scientists as well. Because of the loss of jobs due to not using the metric system in America, the country won’t advance. The biggest argument against changing is the people, a strong source that

The U.S. has been suggesting to go metric since 1866 (Unmacht). We have not been completely avoiding the other system the nation wanted to convert for a very long time. The president of the U.S. Metric system says “people are moving more metric then they think” (Unmacht). In the current time, the nation has been going more metric in advertisements, class lecture, and in everyday products. Some U.S. industries and companies have gone Metric (Unmacht). It is helpful for some companies to switch so the business would not have any trouble conversing. The United States is only fully industrialised country and does not use the metric system and it is a paramount system.

An interesting fact is that only 3 countries don’t use the metric system. Another interesting fact is that at one point Canada did not use metric. The Metric system Is a system of measurement that is as said earlier is used in most countries.The Us is one of the few that doesn't use metric. The reason this is because most countries deemed it suitable, but the U.S still uses Imperial measurement. In short the United States should convert to the metric system because conversion from standard to metric is difficult, the metric system is more precise, and people already use metric in the US anyway.

Although the founding fathers decided to leave the idea of establishing a national language out of the Constitution, there have been several movements to establish English as the national language since then. Even though none of these movements could garnish enough support to make this into a reality, they have been influential in that English is the official language in 31 states. In recent years, five additional states have considered legislation that would mandate English as well (Schwarz 2014). Since many individual states have sided on the issue, it poses the question of if the national government should follow the trend as well. A strong argument can be made that the United States should make English as the official language because it would promote unity and patriotism among Americans, be economically beneficial for the nation while rightfully placing the responsibility to learn English on the non-English speaking immigrants.

American students going into science and math fields have to learn both systems of measurements. The U.S. spends so much time educating its kids in customary conversions, when it could use that time to teach improved curriculum and better prepare future generations (“The United States and the Metric System”). Also, conversion errors have once cost NASA $125 million dollars. A 1999 Mars orbiter crashed due to some of the engineers using customary measurements, while the rest of the crew used metric (Rigsby). Instead of losing precious time and money trying to convert between two systems, America needs to convert to

Some successful unit measure that is related to the Medieval Flemishy and SI system are Flemish ellis. The ell is a unit of measurement that was used back in around the sixteenth century. This measurement was mostly used by weaver's. The SI units are "base units defined in an absolute way without referring to any other units" (The Measurers, Measuring cloth). National Goverment adopted and adapted to the International unit systems in the late nineteen hundredths. The first president to look into approving the SI metric system is Thomas Jefferson. The Competitiveness Act and the Omnibus trade were passed around the late nineteen hundredths by the congress. In the United States the metric system of measurement is also known as "Soft Metric". Scientists prefer to use only one system of measurements so that they wouldn't get confused when measuring something. Also if they get measurements from lets say another scientist that is one the other side of the United States in order for the scientists to get the same results they would need the same

The debate on whether or not the United States should go to the metric system has been ongoing for years and still to this day the United States uses the English System of Measurements. It includes the inch, foot, yard and mile, along with many other units of measurement. The United States is one of three countries that still use other systems of measurement instead of going metric. The other two countries that have not adopted to using the metric system are Liberia and Burma, also known as Myanmar.

The teacher then pulls up a metric conversion problem on the smart board. The class reads it together and determines the action that needs to be taken to solve the problem. For example, what is the given unit of measurement and what measurement is required to solve the problem?

Some believe that the government is too small, and should expand. I believe that the government should not expand, but should shrink slightly. Of course, America needs a uniform currency and a single armed forces, but local and state control over matters which relate to them can result in a streamlined government process, leaving the matters of national importance to the national government. Overall, whether a national government is stronger or weaker, America still has the greatest governmental structure in the world. It may have flaws, but it has and will continue to persevere through

There is an ongoing debate about whether America should switch to the metric system or remain with the standard system. Both sides have very convincing arguments and are usually very unwilling to change their view on the matter. I belong to side the of the argument that believes that we should switch over to the metric system.

Unit conversions are important because, the U.S. does not use the metric system. It is important to understand how to convert to the metric system for science, like exercise physiology. For instance, we measure weight in pounds, but in hospitals they convert pounds to kilograms. Medicine dosages are measured using the metric system, so you have to convert the weight to metric weight.

Having one curriculum would hopefully allow the United States to compete with other nations. The United States is outperformed on international assessments by countries that have high standards (“The Facts on Common Core State Standards”). Dan Domeneon, from the American Association of School Administration, stated “It is going to be very difficult for us to be globally competitive if we continue to have 50 sets of standards when we go off against countries that have only one” (Boulard). This makes perfect sense; how is the United States expected to compete against nations that have one curriculum when the U.S. has 50 different curriculums? But, people have been questioning if changing the curriculum to one national curriculum will improve the United States overall education ranking in the

countries of the world. National standards in math, science, and history have all been published, and have influenced many different states, and their schools, to change and somewhat conform curriculum. These standards are designed to promote the improvement of school standards, make school districts more equal, and make it easier to see where we are as a country in regards to education of young people. Some, however, feel that these national standards, though voluntary, may bring schools which are already thriving down to the minimum level suggested. They also fear that these standards will allow local governments to become lazy in funding and in concern for the schools. Regardless

In Standardization the aggregation of demand information can help them to better forecast the need of the continent instead of the need of a country within that continent. Standardization will reduce required parts inventory due to risk pooling and reduce parts cost due to economies of scales.