Animal Testing Research Paper

“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated” (Mahatma Gandhi). Scientists have been using animals for biomedical research for centuries. They provide a source to get information scientists can not get without harming humans. A lot of debate is spread about whether it is good or bad. Animal experimentation is a controversial topic because it is helpful to humans, but it is also cruel and inhumane.

The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel and inhumane but also often ineffective. Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. There have been past occasions where drugs passed on animals weren’t even safe. There is no excuse for animal testing in today’s techy world, there are now many alternatives for animal testing that would put an end to the pain and suffering endured by these innocent animals during human testing.

People often use animals for a lot of experiments even though most people think that is it wrong. People make up countless excuses to why it’s okay to do this. But it is not okay. Animal researchers and such agree with my opinion that using animals for tests that we as humans would never want to do, is bad and very hypocritical, yet unfortunately there are just as many scientists who say that it is completely fine and that there isn’t really much harm brought to the animals. Mind you, these scientists have apparently never owned a beloved pet close to their heart. The two essays, "Animal Rights, Human Wrongs" by Tom Regan and "Proud to be Speciesist" by Stephen Rose, talk about the issue of animal rights, but are written on completely opposing

How could one not feel guilty when looking into a test animal’s eyes and seeing all of the pain and suffering that they have endured? Over 75-100 million animals are used for scientific and medical research per year. (Baumans) Animals should not be used for scientific and medical research because it is unethical, humans and animals are not genetically identical resulting in failed tests, and there are other techniques to conduct research.

Before jumping into the whole justification of animal experimentation, it’s important to examine the rights and guidelines that protect the animal itself. Although there may be different guidelines for different animals, the following were created by the American Psychological Association (APA). According to the APA, the first guideline goes to explain that research should be “undertaken with a clear specific purpose.” The research must come to a reasonable expectation such as increasing the understanding of the animals under study, or providing outcomes that will have an impact on “the health,” or well-being of individuals or other creatures. The drive of this study ought to “ensure a significance to prove the use of nonhuman animals.” Whoever the

Just in the United States, “there are about 26 million different species, from dogs to birds, being used every year for medical and science related testing” (“Animals in Science / Research”). Throughout the process of testing, “monkeys are addicted to drugs, cats are deafened and have holes drilled into their skulls, sheep and pigs have their skin burned off, and rats have their spinal cords crushed” (“Animals in Medical Experiments”). As a result, animals face cruel conditions and have no way of fighting back. Although medical testings on animals may cure the deadliest diseases such as cancer and tuberculosis, the abuse and mistreatment these animals face while testing medicines should be deemed inhumane, and such practices should be banned in the United States.

On Earth, humans must coexist with the many types of animals and respect them as equals on their shared territory. Animals are not treated as equals and therefore the animals are suffering from the harm that humans are inflicting on them through animal testing experimentation. These acts of animal experimentation have caused a decrease in the number of some species of animals, while others have broken several rights that animals have and are protected under The Animal Welfare Act. Animal experimentation is wrong because people use animals for beauty product testing, cloning, and medical research which violates animal rights. Animal experimentation is occurring through several different selfish acts by humans. We as humans use animals for our own benefits and do not take the animals into consideration.

Animal research has led to numerous improvements for the quality of life in humans and other animals. The humane treatment of animals requires that if there is an alternative way of getting the same results, without using animals, then that should be done. Reducing the number of animals used for research would result in an increase in humans being used for research; therefore, it is not reasonable to decrease the number of test animals. Humans cannot justify an objection to killing an animal involved in a biomedical investigation if they are willing to eat animals. The killing of an animal to meet the needs of human beings is judged as reasonable by most people. The enormous amount of benefits to human beings has made biomedical experimentation on animals justifiable. Non-human animals have non-negligible moral worth. Causing and animal to go through excruciating pain to bring a tinge of pleasure to a human is wrong. Believing there is a moral difference between evil we do and evil we do not prevent must be rejected to make the researchers’ calculations implausible. It is believed that perpetrating and evil is worse than permitting an

Animal testing is morally wrong. Tests are done on monkeys, guinea pigs, mice, rabbits, cats, dogs, and many other animals. These animals are exposed to chemicals and are sometimes purposefully injured to observe recovery (if there is any). “9 out of 10 candidates that appear safe and effective in animal studies fail when given to humans”(About Animal Testing). These animals are put through terrible tests and awful living conditions, and despite the efforts, some are inaccurate. Scientists still conduct experiments partially because they get better pay that way (Starer). Using animals lives for human benefit and profit is cruel and cold-hearted.

There are alternative methods of testing that do not involve inflicting pain upon a living creature, testing on animals is inhumane, and in addition animals are often very different from human beings. One example of this is thalidomide which was a sleeping pill released in the 1950’s. This drug caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities. It was tested on animals prior to its commercial release. Tests were done on pregnant mice, guinea pigs, hamsters, and cats and all did not result in birth defects unless given in high doses. The cellular, metabolic, and anatomic differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings(ProCon). The anticipated outcome for how the drug will work on humans is based off of animal testing. Thalidomide is just one example of how this does not always happen, and how dangerous this can be.With all of the advances in society there are absolutely ways of testing that do not harm animals. Artificial Human Skin and Microfluidic chips are alternative methods that more accurately portray the human body and have no effect on animals as they are both grown in test tubes(ProCon). In addition it is my opinion that animal testing is cruel. If you look at intelligence rates in animals it is astounding how much they understand and feel. Humans feel completely superior and this is what allows us to harm other living things for our benefit(Shanks). The truth of the matter is that torturing a living thing for another benefit can not be validated just because the living thing does not look like you, or communicate like

When it comes to the topic of animal testing, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this agreement ends, however, is on the question of whether it helps ensure the safety of drugs for human consumption. Where some are convinced that these drugs tested saves many human lives. Others maintain that these tests serve no purpose in the end because the drugs used fall short to heal human disease. My own view is that testing animals with these drugs is not the most efficient way since animals and humans are not exactly similar, making the results unreliable.

Most people agree that animals acquire at least some moral status as people have pets and speak out against crimes against animals, an example being animal shelters using euthanasia. Animals should be given the same level of respectful treatment as a human test subject would. We do not have the right to force animals to further benefit discoveries and our own goals, putting them into dangerous conditions that could alter their health. Peter Singer writes, “...whenever experimenters claim that their experiments are important enough to justify the use of animals, we should ask them whether they would be prepared to use a brain-damaged human being at a similar mental level to the animals they are planning to use” (Animal Liberation). Just because ‘we are human’ is not an adequate excuse for us to degrade animals and other living creatures to a lower moral

Animal experimentation has been used for centuries for biomedical research. One of the earliest examples is Greek physicians such as Aristotle and Galen who conducted tests on animals to get a better understanding of humans and make advances in the field of science. This method of experimenting on animals is out of date in today’s advanced technological society. This discussion of using animal for experimentation has dominated societal conversations for many years now due to many reasons. This includes the fact that there are alternatives, it proves ineffective, and it violates federal law.

Millions of animals are being tested and half of them died each day because of these tests. The animal should not be treated thing way because how would you feel if people were taking body parts out or put in. Many of these animals are going extinct because of the tests.According to reporters”Animal testing has never really worked. In fact, 90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in tests on humans(By KELLY OVERTON).One might think that testing these animals

When it comes to the topic of animal testing, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this agreement ends, however, is on the question of whether it helps ensure the safety of drugs for human consumption. Where some are convinced that these drugs tested saves many human lives. Others maintain that these tests serve no purpose in the end because the drugs used fall short to heal human disease. My own view is that testing animals with these drugs is not the most efficient way for animals and humans and because of that we are not exactly similar, making the results unreliable.